Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interaction types

Type of Adsorbate-Adsorbent Interaction Type of Adsorbent ... [Pg.572]

Here we shall assume that the temperature shift is due to the thermal expansion effect of proteins on the inter chromophore distances among P, Bl, and Bm- For simplicity we shall assume that the temperature dependence of interchromophore interactions are of the dipole-dipole interaction type. In this case, notice that the excitonic energy splitting of P is AE = Ep+ — Ep-,... [Pg.15]

The ionic enhancement effects are illustrated in Table 3.19 by the allyl anion 7 and cation 8 for interaction types (3.102c) and (3.102d), respectively. In both cases... [Pg.191]

An implementation uses collaborations to define interactions types to define interfaces and roles between objects and classes to define the implementation of individual objects. [Pg.231]

Type II and IV AIs are characteristic of polymolecular adsorption in nonporous (macroporous) (II) and mesoporous (IV) PS. The steep part of such AIs close to the origin corresponds to relatively strong G/H interaction. Type III and V AIs are characteristic of G/G > G/H. [Pg.274]

The first three terms, stretch, bend and torsion, are common to most force fields although their explicit form may vary. The nonbonded terms may be further divided into contributions from Van der Waals (VdW), electrostatic and hydrogen-bond interactions. Most force fields include potential functions for the first two interaction types (Lennard-Jones type or Buckingham type functions for VdW interactions and charge-charge or dipole-dipole terms for the electrostatic interactions). Explicit hydrogen-bond functions are less common and such interactions are often modeled by the VdW expression with special parameters for the atoms which participate in the hydrogen bond (see below). [Pg.3]

Figure 6.1. The two main types of A-minor interactions, type I and type n, according to reference, or sngar-sugar tram and sngar-sngar cis according to reference. ... Figure 6.1. The two main types of A-minor interactions, type I and type n, according to reference, or sngar-sugar tram and sngar-sngar cis according to reference. ...
ANTIBODY-HAPTEN INTERACTIONS TYPE 1, 2, 3 COPPER BINDING SITES Type I dehydrogenase,... [Pg.786]

Type I and 2 mononuclear copper centers in enzymes and proteins are distinguished by theit different EPR spectra for Cu(ll). Type 1 and 2 spectra exhibit comparatively narrowly and widely spaced hyperfine lines, respectively, for the electton-nuclear spin interaction. The more narrow the spacing, the weaker is the interaction. Type 1 cupric centers generally have an intensely blue color, whereas type 2 centets are virtually colotless. [Pg.315]

The parameterization of an interaction is dependent not only on the atoms involved but also on their environment. With the exception of generic force fields, each chemically unique interaction type has to be parameterized independently. For both generic and conventional force fields, the atom types need to be specified in the input file. [Pg.41]

It is important to note that the lattice image in Fig. 18a does not depend on the interaction type and even on the aperture size provided the lattices are perfect and the k/1 ratio is an integer number. If there are defects in the real space structure and the distance between them is comparable with the contact radius, the phase relation between the lattices can be distorted and the regular structure will vanish (Fig. 18b). This will also occur when the ratio between periodicities of the tip and surface is irrational. In both cases, a small aperture is required to maintain a reasonable level of the measured signal. [Pg.101]

Figure 7.42 Types of gas sorption isotherm - microporous solids are characterised by a type I isotherm. Type II corresponds to macroporous materials with point B being the point at which monolayer coverage is complete. Type III is similar to type II but with adsorbate-adsorbate interactions playing an important role. Type IV corresponds to mesoporous industrial materials with the hysteresis arising from capillary condensation. The limiting adsorption at high P/P0 is a characteristic feature. Type V is uncommon. It is related to type III with weak adsorbent-adsorbate interactions. Type VI represents multilayer adsorption onto a uniform, non-porous surface with each step size representing the layer capacity (reproduced by permission of IUPAC). Figure 7.42 Types of gas sorption isotherm - microporous solids are characterised by a type I isotherm. Type II corresponds to macroporous materials with point B being the point at which monolayer coverage is complete. Type III is similar to type II but with adsorbate-adsorbate interactions playing an important role. Type IV corresponds to mesoporous industrial materials with the hysteresis arising from capillary condensation. The limiting adsorption at high P/P0 is a characteristic feature. Type V is uncommon. It is related to type III with weak adsorbent-adsorbate interactions. Type VI represents multilayer adsorption onto a uniform, non-porous surface with each step size representing the layer capacity (reproduced by permission of IUPAC).
For weak interactions as they occur in host-guest-binding it is important to realize a conceptual difference between the experimental value that is based on the weighted average ensemble of species and the merging of this ensemble into one more or less representative structure that is then commonly used in the delineation of interaction types between the binding partners. [Pg.292]

DISCO considers three-dimensional conformations of compounds not as coordinates but as sets of interpoint distances, an approach similar to a distance geometry conformational search. Points are calculated between the coordinates of heavy atoms labeled with interaction functions such as HBD, HBA or hydrophobes. One atom can carry more than one label. The atom types are considered as far as they determine which interaction type the respective atom would be engaged in. The points of the hypothetical locations of the interaction counterparts in the receptor macromolecule also participate in the distance matrix. These are calculated from the idealized projections of the lone pairs of participating heavy atoms or H-bond forming hydrogens. The hydrophobic points are handled in a way that the hydrophobic matches are limited to, e.g., only one atom in a hydrophobic chain and there is a differentiation between aliphatic and aromatic hydrophobes. A minimum constraint on pharmacophore point of a certain type can be set, e.g. if a certain feature is known to be required for activity [53, 54]. [Pg.26]

The water dimer has been examined in detail with the accent on density functional (Chapter 7) methods [107], and the use of ab initio as well as DFT in counterpoise calculations on it [108]. Using large basis sets and high correlation levels to get high-quality atomization energies (which are of course not of the weak interaction type, and which the counterpoise correction is said to worsen [105b]) is explained in the book by Foresman and Frisch [le]. Energy calculations are discussed further in Section 5.5.2. [Pg.280]

The next basic aspect in the studies of dehydrogenation mechanism is the determination of the H202 interaction type with hydrocarbons. Under high-temperature oxidation conditions this interaction produces unsaturated compounds. Is this reaction the chain of a simple bimolecular type If the process is chain, variations of experimental conditions (presence of inert diluters, small additives, treatment of the reactor surface by various salts, the effect of the surfaceireaction zone volume ratio—the so-called SIV factor, etc.) must significantly change the initiation and chain termination rates. [Pg.103]


See other pages where Interaction types is mentioned: [Pg.242]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.808]    [Pg.809]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.23]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.181 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.73 ]




SEARCH



Agostic interactions types

Chemical Interactions to the Adhesion Between Evaporated Metals and Functional Croups of Different Types at Polymer Surfaces

Closure-drug interactions, types

Cluster-support interactions, types

Coulomb-type interactions

Crown ether-type interactions with ions

Dispersion-type interaction

Drug interactions types

Flagpole type interaction

Forster-type coulombic interactions

Heisenberg-type interaction

Hoogsteen type interactions

Host-guest type interactions

Inter-Reaction Interactions Types

Interaction dispersive-type

Interaction site type models

Intermolecular interactions electrostatic type

Intermolecular interactions hydrophobic type

Intermolecular interactions types

Keesom-type interaction energy

Lewis-type acid-base interactions

London-type interaction

Molecular crystals, magnetism magnetic interactions, type

Noncovalent interactions types

Ordered surfactant interactions, types

Receptor-drug interactions bond types

Relaxation mechanism interaction, types

S-P type interaction

Supramolecular interactions types

The Types of Molecular Interactions

The three types of Van der Waals interaction

Thole-type interactions

Tissue interaction analysis types

Types of Analyte Interactions with the Stationary Phase

Types of Interactions

Types of Molecular Interactions

Types of Neutron Interactions

Types of Resonance Interactions

Types of donor-acceptor interactions

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator interactions

Van der Waals-type interaction

Van der Waals-type interaction carbons

Water-Rock Interactions and the Types of Rocks Passed

© 2024 chempedia.info