Membranes posttreatments

Roughness parameters obtained from AFM can also be used for the comparison of different membrane surfaces. The membrane posttreatment alters the surface roughness. By etching the surface, roughness increases, and by heating, the roughness decreases. 

Figure 10.15 shows the main screen that opens when the program is initiated. This screen does not have any actual inputs other than the "Go" or run program icon at the top center of the screen (see call out number "8" in Figure 10.1). The screen shows a process flow diagram including the RO membranes and feed pump, chemical feed pretreatment (if needed), and posttreatment degasification and chemical treatment (if needed). The program returns to this screen after each of the other input screens are completed.

However, the methods applied to obtain membranes with hydrophUic and chemically modifiable surfaces via physical or chemical posttreatment of hydrophobic membranes often result in unwanted and irreproducible inhomogeneities [95]. Thus the main limitation for supports in affinity separation presently encountered lies in the availabiUty of membranes with functional groups suitable for ligand coupling. This imposes an increased need for the development of hydrophilic microfiltration membranes with suitable fimctionalizable groups. 

Today the majority of polymeric porous flat membranes used in microfiltration, ultrafiltration, and dialysis are prepared from a homogenous polymer solution by the wet-phase inversion method [59-66]. This method involves casting of a polymer solution onto an inert support followed by immersion of the support with the cast film into a bath filled with a non-solvent for the polymer. The contact between the solvent and the non-solvent causes the solution to be phase separated. This process involves the use of organic solvents that must be expensively removed from the membrane with posttreatments, since residual solvents can cause potential problems for use in biomedical apphcations (i.e., dialysis). Moreover, long formation times and a limited versatihty (reduced possibUity to modulate cell size and membrane stmcture) characterize this process. 

SC CO2 can dry the polymer membrane rapidly and totally without the collapse of the stmcmre due to the absence of a liquid-vapor interface. The membrane can be obtained without additional posttreatments because there are no solvent residues. 

Posttreatment processes have been used to improve the quahty of the resulting membranes, such as ion exchange (to provide catalytic properties or change them between hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces), liquid or vapor sililation, coke deposition, CVD (chemical vapor deposition), and ALCVD (atomic layer chemical vapor deposition). These techniques are used to reduce the intercrystalline gaps and the pore-mouth size, modify the acid properties of the modified membranes, and remove amorphous material. Some of these modifications have demonstrated very high separation selectivities for the resulting membranes however, in many cases, they are of limited practical application due to the relatively low fluxes obtained. 

The unique feature of these results is that the hydrogen flux increased and the methane flux decreased when the 1,5 ND-6F homogeneous membranes were heat treated. Here is a case where posttreatment of the membrane has given increased flux for hydrogen with improved Hj/CH selectivity at the same time. With most membranes, one gets increased flux only at the expense of lower selectivity. More conventional membranes also tend to lose considerable flux on annealing. Membranes of 1,5 ND-6F are thermodynamically stable after heat treatment. 

Membrane processes have a potential application within many areas of industrial enzymatic hydrolysis of proteins. Table 1 shows how membrane processes can be applied in the different types of enzymatic modification of protein. Thus membrane processes may be used for pre-treatment of proteins, for the reaction step and as an essential part of the purification or posttreatment step. 

ADME studies. Twelve cows were administered two doses of " C-pirlimycin at a dose rate of 200 mg/quarter into all 4 quarters at a 24-hour interval. This dose rate was selected as the highest potential dose rate before the final efficacious dose of 50 mg/quarter had been firmly established. This treatment rate thus resulted in a 4-fold overdose. Blood, milk, urine and feces were collected at various times following the first dose. Combustion analysis of whole blood produced the time course of total residue, as illustrated in Figure 3 for three of the cows. There was a slow absorption of pirlimycin across the udder membrane/blood barrier with maximum concentrations occurring in the 6- to 12-hour posttreatment period. The terminal depletion of the... 

Typical data for asymmetric fibers for reverse osmosis applications are reported in Table 20.5-1. The ranges of these variables for as-spun and post reared cellulose acetate and polysulfone membranes currently used in gas separation are proprietary. Nevertheless, the surfnee porosity for such membranes is undoubtedly lower than for those described in Table 20,5-1, since, as indicated in Table 20,1-2, in their posttreated forms such membranes have seleclivities approaching the values or dense films. Porosities as high as those shown in Table 20.5-1 weuld produce unacceptably low seleclivities as a result of nondiscrirafimat pore flow,... 

An industrial reverse osmosis plant usually will consist of three separate sections which are shown in Figure 4.2. The first section is the pretreatment section in which the feedwater is treated to meet the requirements of reverse osmosis element manufacturers and the dictates of good engineering practice. Following pretreatment, the feedwater is introduced into the reverse osmosis section where the feedwater is pressurized and routed to the reverse osmosis elements which are in pressure vessels. The feedwater flows across the membrane surface where product water permeates through the membrane and a predetermined amount remains behind as reject. The reject is discharged to waste while the product water is routed to the posttreatment section. The third or posttreatment section treats the product water to remove carbon dioxide and adds chemicals as required for industrial use of the product water. 

Dry Fractionation—is the simplest fractionation technique because no additives or posttreatment of the end product is involved. Fractionation is basically a two-stage process. First the oil is crystallized by cooling the oil in a controlled manner to the required temperature in a crystallizer. The oil is then filtered to separate the liquid from the solid fraction by means of a vacuum filter or membrane filter press. Recent developments of new and more efficient crystallizers and reliable high-pressure membrane filters moved dry fractionation from a third choice to a good alternative for solvent fractionation in many cases. 

Patel et al (1994) employed a combined process of coagulation and MF to avoid a disinfection posttreatment. The coagulation step was used to eliminate phosphorus, arsenic, and viruses, to avoid fouling, decrease particle accumulation on the membrane surface, and improve backflush characteristics. MF pilot plant studies in constant permeate flux mode showed that turbidity, particles, and faecal coliforms could be removed, but TOC removal was unreliable. Crossflow MF showed no difference to dead-end filtration, and both methods were similar to or better than sand filtration. Results with coagulation and MF improved phosphorous and turbidity removal, but the process was not optimised. The treatment lead to a reduction of chlorine demand in the product water. 

Clair D.H., Adams P.V., Shreve S. (1997), Microfiltralion of a high-turbidity surface water with posttreatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis, Proc. AWWA Membrane Technology Conference, New Orleans, Feb. 97, 23.3-268. 

Kasper D.R. (1993), Pre- and posttreatment processes for membrane water treatment systems, Proc. of the AWWA Membrane Technology Conference, Aug 93, Baltimore, 105-137. 

Another process of membrane fabrication is posttreatment. Posttreatment is the process after membrane formation via in-situ inter dal polycondensation. Various types of posttreatment such as heat treatment, chemical treatment and so on were investigated to change chemical and physical characters of membranes. 

Improvement of Membrane Selectivity (UTC-70R) Tb improve membrane selectivity, polyamide chains in the membrane are prefened to be packed tightly. We found that a certain posttreatment aimed to cleavage hydrogen bond of polyamide and reorder polymer chains effectively improved membrane selectivity of UTC-70 (Figure 8). This type of membrane are commercialized as "UTC-70R", and membrane performance is shown Figure 7. 

Tang, W., Jia, S., Jia, Y., Yang, H. The influence of fermentation conditions and posttreatment methods on porosity of bacterial cellulose membrane. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26(1), 125-131 (2010)... 

Over the past decade, many attempts have been reported to enhance separation performances of ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes through variation of different parameters involved during the membrane preparation process such as dope formulation, casting/spinning conditions, and posttreatment [1-5]. Of the parameters studied, it is found that the utilization of advanced materials in preparing membrane of improved properties stiU remains top priority among the community of membrane scientists worldwide. 

---