Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Impurity determination relative

The quantity and volume of samples required for impurity determination by CZE are very small probably less than 5 uL of volume is required for a well-designed injector, and only a few nanoliters (i.e., a few nanograms) are actually injected. However, it is experimentally simpler if that sample is present in a relatively concentrated solution, 0.05-2 mg/mL, when UV detection is being used. Our focus was not to achieve ultra-low detection limits such as might be required for trace level contaminants or for quantitation of trace levels of natural products. For those applications, the most common approach has been the use of a laser-based detector, preferably combined with a fluorescent label on the analyte. With this combination, extremely low limits of detection can be achieved (9, 22-25). [Pg.45]

Although the participation of the phosphoryl group in the tautomeric equilibria of certain esters has been alluded to already (Section II), early determination (by B. A. Arbuzov and co-workers, and reviewed by Mastryukova and Kabachnik ) of the enol content of tautomeric mixtures by bromine titration or by UV spectroscopy, indicated, at most, only low percentages (0-10%) of enol content for many compounds and it was felt that such low figures could easily represent the presence of unsaturated compounds as impurities. A relatively high pX value, e.g. 11.89 for triethyl phosphonoacetate, is now recognized as characteristic of a compound as a CH acid, and an indication of lack of enolization equally, a relatively low is associated with an OH acid to be found as the... [Pg.556]

The HPLC technique has certain advantages that allow partition coefficients to be determined relatively rapidly in comparison to the conventional shaking-flask method. The elution process also makes it feasible to run mixture of solutes and yield results relatively free of solute-solute or solute-impurity interactions with a column giving good separation. Basically, the precision of the method depends on whether the value of yw/7o solute in the octanol-water system [Eq. (5)] can be effectively simulated by the column composition. It is therefore important that efforts be expanded to ensure that the properties of the column environment accurately reflect the bulk solvent-water (e.g., octanol-water) characteristics. If the solute can truly be equilibrated between mobile and stationary phases during elution, its retention time is determined by the ratio of the activity coefficients (i.e., partition constant) in the mobile and stationary phases. When octanol and... [Pg.127]

Smith analysed bis (trimethylsilyl) acetamide on a column of unsilinazed Chromosorb W coated with 5% potassium hydroxide from methanol solution, (solvent was evaporated at 60°C in air). The support was heated at 500°C overnight, then coated with 20% of liquid paraffin from toluene. By using this column, commercial samples of bis (trimethylsilyl) acetamide were found to be 90 to 97% pure, the main impurities being hexamethyldisiloxane and trimethylsilylaceta-mide. Molar response data for these compounds were determined relative to nonane as an internal standard. [Pg.232]

Impurity determination IPCs are used to monitor the removal of critical impurities from the product-rich solution layer or by solvent extractions or cake washes. The IPC criteria are usually expressed as RAP of the impurities relative to product in the product-rich solution layer and concentration of the impurity in extracted solution or mother liquor. The use of an impurity profile IPC was... [Pg.409]

Injection repeatability Injection precision is measured by multiple injections, a minimiun of =6 is typically recommended, of the reference standard or sample solution at the 100% level and indicates the performance of the HPLC instrument using the chromatographic conditions on one particular day and in one laboratory. The relative standard deviation, RSD (%), as specified here, will determine the lowest variation limit of the analytical results. Repeatability for impurities determination is often assessed by making repeat injections typically = 6 of an impurity mixture and a statistical evaluation maybe performed using area response. [Pg.448]

Accuracy For macro-major samples, relative errors of 0.1-0.2% are routinely achieved. The principal limitations are solubility losses, impurities in the precipitate, and the loss of precipitate during handling. When it is difficult to obtain a precipitate free from impurities, an empirical relationship between the precipitate s mass and the mass of the analyte can be determined by an appropriate standardization. [Pg.254]

Investigated is the influence of the purity degree and concentration of sulfuric acid used for samples dissolution, on the analysis precision. Chosen are optimum conditions of sample preparation for the analysis excluding loss of Ce(IV) due to its interaction with organic impurities-reducers present in sulfuric acid. The photometric technique for Ce(IV) 0.002 - 0.1 % determination in alkaline and rare-earth borates is worked out. The technique based on o-tolidine oxidation by Ce(IV). The relative standard deviation is 0.02-0.1. [Pg.198]

One of the most common modes of characterization involves the determination of a material s surface chemistry. This is accomplished via interpretation of the fiag-mentation pattern in the static SIMS mass spectrum. This fingerprint yields a great deal of information about a sample s outer chemical nature, including the relative degree of unsaturation, the presence or absence of aromatic groups, and branching. In addition to the chemical information, the mass spectrum also provides data about any surface impurities or contaminants. [Pg.552]

The resolution required in any analytical SEC procedure, e.g., to detect sample impurities, is primarily based on the nature of the sample components with respect to their shape, the relative size differences of species contained in the sample, and the minimal size difference to be resolved. These sample attributes, in addition to the range of sizes to be examined, determine the required selectivity. Earlier work has shown that the limit of resolvability in SEC of molecules [i.e., the ability to completely resolve solutes of different sizes as a function of (1) plate number, (2) different solute shapes, and (3) media pore volumes] ranges from close to 20% for the molecular mass difference required to resolve spherical solutes down to near a 10% difference in molecular mass required for the separation of rod-shaped molecules (Hagel, 1993). To approach these limits, a SEC medium and a system with appropriate selectivity and efficiency must be employed. [Pg.30]

Relatively little has been reported regarding the determination of the purity of the halide salts other than by standard spectroscopic measurements and microanalysis. This is largely because the halide salts are rarely used as solvents themselves, but are generally simply a source of the desired cation. Also, the only impurities likely to be present in any significant quantity are unreacted starting materials and residual reaction solvents. Thus, for most applications it is sufficient to ensure that they are free of these by use of FF NMR spectroscopy. [Pg.11]

Assuming that the number average degree of polymerization (DP ) is determined by chain transfer to monomer and assuming unimolecular termination relative to propagation (i.e., chain breaking due to solvent, polymer, impurities are absent), the simple Mayo equation55 ... [Pg.35]

TLC Analysis. Samples were examined by TLC using standard procedures. Rf values were determined and compared with those of authentic reference materials. Radioactive components were located by scanning (Vanguard Instrument Corp., North Haven, Conn., Model 885) or by autoradiography (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, N. Y., type AA film). The relative Rf value of DCDD on silica gel plates (Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, N. Y., type For,4) when developed with n-hexane dioxane acetic acid, 90 10 4, V/V/V, was 0.90. The observed impurity had a relative Rf value of 0.40. On Brinkmann alumina plates, developed with n-hexane, DCDD had a relative Rf of 0.32. Neither system separated the chlorinated dibenzodioxin isomers. [Pg.6]

Praseodymium di-iodide, Prl2, can essentially be made in the same way. If sufficient care is taken to exclude air and moisture, oxidic impurities can be avoided. To avoid the formation of Pr2ls, praseodymium metal is used in excess as chunks to easily remove the unreacted metal after the reaction is completed. The pure compound Prl2 is thus obtained, with a reaction temperature well above the peritectic temperature, around 800 °C. Reaction times seem not to matter much, a few days are usually sufficient, perhaps even less. The cooling procedure, however, is crucial as it determines the phases (I through V) that are formed and their relative quantities. Section 4.3 will deal with this issue. [Pg.48]

SIMS intensities from the "clean" Cu/Ni surfaces cannot be used to determine Cu/Ni surface concentrations, or relative change in concentration from one surface to another. This is because trace impurities (of very low but unknown concentration) preferentially bond to Ni sites and therefore the Ni containing SIMS cluster ions are preferentially enhanced, leading to an erroneously high determination of Ni concentration. [Pg.324]

Electrochemical reactions at semiconductor electrodes have a number of special features relative to reactions at metal electrodes these arise from the electronic structure found in the bulk and at the surface of semiconductors. The electronic structure of metals is mainly a function only of their chemical nature. That of semiconductors is also a function of other factors acceptor- or donor-type impurities present in bulk, the character of surface states (which in turn is determined largely by surface pretreatment), the action of light, and so on. Therefore, the electronic structure of semiconductors having a particular chemical composition can vary widely. This is part of the explanation for the appreciable scatter of experimental data obtained by different workers. For reproducible results one must clearly define all factors that may influence the state of the semiconductor. [Pg.250]


See other pages where Impurity determination relative is mentioned: [Pg.183]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.3628]    [Pg.3634]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.1656]    [Pg.2063]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.298]   


SEARCH



Impurities determination

© 2024 chempedia.info