Hazardous waste system, existing chemical

Chemical contaminants for which full-scale treatment data exist include primarily volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs). These SVOCs include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pentachlorophenol (PCP), pesticides, and herbicides. Extremely volatile metals, such as mercury and lead, can be removed by higher temperature thermal desorption systems. The technology has been applied to refinery wastes, coal tar wastes, wood-treating wastes, creosote-contaminated soils, hydrocarbon-contaminated soils, mixed (radioactive and hazardous) wastes, synthetic mbber processing wastes, and paint wastes. 

Second, waste that contains hazardous substances is classified based on considerations of health risks to the public that arise from waste disposal. The existing classification systems for radioactive and chemical wastes in the United States are not based primarily on considerations of health risks to the public. Rather, classification of hazardous wastes has been based primarily on the source of the waste or the presence of particular hazardous substances. The absence of risk-based waste classifications has had a number of undesirable ramifications ... 

The primary purpose of this Report is to present NCRP s recommendations on classification of hazardous wastes. The Report is directed at a multidisciplinary audience with different levels of technical understanding in the fields of radiation and chemical risk assessment and radioactive and chemical waste management. Anew hazardous waste classification system is proposed that differs from the existing classification systems for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes in two fundamental respects. First, hazardous waste would be classified based on considerations of health risks to the public that arise from disposal of waste. Hazardous waste would not be classified based, for example, on its source. Second, the classification system would apply to any hazardous waste, and separate classification systems for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes would not be retained. In the proposed system, waste would be classified based only on its properties, and the same rules would apply in classifying all hazardous wastes. 

The discussions of classification of radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes and management of mixed waste in Sections 4.1 to 4.3 are presented in considerable detail to facilitate understanding of these issues by readers who may not be knowledgeable in these areas. The existing hazardous waste classification systems and the historical developments underlying them are complex. NCRP believes that an appreciation of these complexities is important in gaining an understanding of the need for a new hazardous waste classification system and the benefits it would provide. 

Previous sections have presented technical and historical information on radiation and chemical risk assessment and on classification of radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes. This information provides important perspectives for establishing the foundations of a new hazardous waste classification system. Before establishing these foundations, it is useful to specify the attributes that an ideal waste classification system should possess. The following sections identify the desirable attributes of a waste classification system including that the system should be risk-based, it should allow for exemption of waste, and it should be comprehensive, consistent, intrinsic, comprehensible, quantitative, compatible with existing systems, and flexible. These attributes should be recognized as goals that are not all likely to be fully realized in a practical waste classification system. 

The existing waste classification systems for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes clearly are not comprehensive. At a fundamental level, entirely separate and quite different classification systems have been developed for the two types of hazardous waste. In addition, each classification system is not comprehensive in the context of the general type of waste to which each system applies. In the existing radioactive waste classification system, waste that arises from operations of the nuclear fuel cycle is classified separately from NARM waste. The existing classification system for hazardous chemical waste excludes many potentially important wastes that contain hazardous chemicals. 

Unfortunately, however, it is difficult for anyone to fully comprehend the existing classification systems for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes. These systems are not based on clearly stated principles from which a logical and transparent classification system might follow, and the two systems approach classification and disposal of hazardous waste in different ways. The systems intermix legal and technical considerations in ways that sometimes defy logic. A few examples of the incongruities in the waste classification systems that result in a lack of transparency and difficulties in comprehension are described below. 

A risk-based waste classification system would be established by focusing on risks that arise from disposal of hazardous wastes. Thus, the amounts of hazardous chemical wastes that would be acceptable for near-surface disposal over the longer term would need to be evaluated. While NCRP believes that many hazardous chemical wastes would continue to be acceptable for near-surface disposal, it should be anticipated that this will not be the case for some wastes that contain high concentrations of heavy metals e.g., see Okrent and Xing (1993). As a result, some hazardous chemical wastes could be classified as high-hazard (see next section), and such a classification also could also mean that perpetual institutional control will be required at some existing burial sites. 

An ideal system for classifying hazardous wastes should be risk-based, applicable to all wastes that contain radionuclides or hazardous chemicals, internally consistent, based on intrinsic waste properties, comprehensible, quantitative, and compatible with existing or feasible data and methods. To the extent that these attributes are lacking in a waste classification system, undesirable consequences are likely to result. 

Has EHS evaluated waste streams for impact on Plant Waste Water Treatment Facilities (Compatibility with existing plant waste treatment system capabilities, required provisions for RCRA hazardous waste chemicals, proper notification of governmental agencies, effect on EHS operations personnel, effect on discharges to the Publicly Owned Treatment Work(s) (POTW) or river, and others.)... 

Case 2 - The Hyde Park Landfill site, located in an industrial complex in the extreme northwest corner of Niagara, New York, was used from 1953 to 1975 as a disposal site for an estimated 80,000 tons of chemical waste, including chlorinated hydrocarbons. A compacted clay cover was installed in 1978 over the landfill and a tile leachate collection system was installed in 1979. Hazardous compounds such as ortho-, meta- and para-chlorobenzoic acid toluene ortho- and meta-chlorotoluene 3,4-dichlorotoluene and 2,6-dichlorotoluene were detected in the leachate (Irvine et al., 1984). Since 1979, the existing leachate treatment system has used activated carbon as the technology for removing organic carbon. Although... 

The SFA requires the definition of respective substances, a comprehensive analysis of the system (i.e. boundaries), and it is always limited in its extent due to process properties and data availability. Within this chapter the implementation of SFA for tracing hazardous substances in international informal e-waste treatment has been proved to be a useful method. To assess the hazardous consequences and potential risks of the selected chemicals to humans and the environment caused by informal recycling activities in those regions, different models exist, from which four have been chosen according to their specific focus and various pros and cons. 

The objective of the study presented in this Report was to address difficulties (elaborated, for example, in Sections 1.3.1.5 and 1.4) that have arisen from use of the existing classification systems for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes. An important impetus for... 

The existing classification systems for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes in the United States and approaches to disposal of... 

The recommended risk-based waste classification system has important implications in three areas (1) the resulting classification of existing radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes, (2) subclassification of the basic waste classes, and (3) changes in existing laws and regulations that would be required to implement such a classification system. 

DOE s high-level wastes as if they were among the most hazardous of all radioactive wastes. However, the concentrations of hazardous substances in some of these wastes are similar to those in low-level radioactive waste that is normally intended for disposal in near-surface facilities. In contrast, some chemical wastes that are highly hazardous, compared with other wastes, and nondegradable are being sent to near-surface disposal facilities. Both of these situations occur largely because of the source-based aspects of existing waste classification systems. 

Section 4 presents detailed information on existing classification systems for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes, the relationships between waste classification and requirements for waste disposal, and the impacts of waste classification systems on management and disposal of mixed wastes. This Section also summarizes previous NCRP recommendations relevant to waste classification. 

---