Hard water testing

Stoichiometry and Gravimetric Analysis.. Gravimetric Analysis-Hard Water Testing... 

In this study, the stability of bromate in water samples with different matrix constituents was investigated. Water samples ranged from soft to hard and were spiked with 1 mg/L bromide, 0.5 mg/L chlorite and 0.5 mg/L chlorate. These levels are considered to be higher than those normally observed in waters for these three anionic species. Each sample was also spiked with 2.5, 10 and 25 pg/L of bromate. Fiuthermore, a 5 pg/L of bromate standard in deionized water was also prepared. Brown glass bottles capped with polypropylene tops and PTFE inserts were used as sample containers. Samples were stored in the dark at 4 °C. Tables 2.5 and 2.6 summarize matrix constituents of each sample, preservation method spike levels and results of analyses. The results clearly demonstrate that for the two high and low total hardness waters tested, samples containing 2.5 to 25 pg/L bromate were stable for at least 20 days and that the addition of 50 mg/L ethylenediamine (EDA) preservative did not affect the results, as illustrated in Table 2.6. The results also confirm that 5 pg/L bromate standard made up in deionized water had the same stability over this period. 

Soft water LCi Hard water Test species MATC Water hardness (mg/liter as CaCOg) Test species Type of test Ref. 

Acrylamide—polymer/Ct(III)catboxylate gel technology has been developed and field tested in Wyoming s Big Horn Basin (211,212). These gels economically enhance oil recovery from wells that suffer fracture conformance problems. The Cr(III) gel technology was successful in both sandstone and carbonate formations, and was insensitive to H2S, high saline, and hard waters (212). 

This test measures the minimum lime soap dispersant requirement (LSDR) (in g) which keeps 100 g of sodium oleate from precipitating in hard water (333 ppm CaC03). Although this is a convenient laboratory test, it bears little relation to an real in-use situation. 

Tests should also be done in the presenee of organic matter (e.g. albumin) and in hard water. It is important to remember when performing viable counts that care must be taken to ensure that, at the moment of sampling, the disinfection process is immediately arrested by the use of a suitable neutralizer or ensuring inactivation by dilution (Table 11.4). Membrane filtration is an alternative procedure, the principle of whieh is that treated cells are retained on the filter whilst the disinfectant forms the filtrate. After washing in situ, the membrane is transferred to the surface of a solid (agar) reeoveiy medium and the eolonies that develop on the membrane are counted. 

A standardized viral suspension is exposed, in the presence of yeast suspension, to appropriate dilutions of disinfectant in WHO hard water. At appropriate times, dilutions are made in inactivated horse serum and each dilution is inoculated into tissue cell culture or embryonated eggs (as appropriate for the test virus). The drop in infectivity of the treated virus is compared with that of the control (untreated) virus. 

The contents of tap water vary among communities. In some areas, the water is hard. Hard water is water that contains large amounts of calcium or magnesium ions. Hardness can be measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L) of calcium or magnesium ions. Hard water makes it difficult to get hair, clothes, and dishes clean. In this lab, you will learn how hard water is softened and how softening water affects its ability to clean. You will also collect, test, and classify local sources of water. 

Use a grease pencil to label three large test tubes D (for distilled water), H (for hard water), and... 

Obtain about 50-mL of hard water in a beaker from your teacher. Slowly pour hard water into test tube H until you reach the marked height. 

An initial screening test was developed to measure the peracid release of a fully formulated chelant-free detergent powder to which equimolar amounts of chelants were added. Peracid release was measured at 40 °C over 30 min in a synthetic hard water with transition metal ions added at ppm levels representative of those found in wash liquors of a typical washing machine with added soil [36] Ca 76, Mg 15, Fe... 

EDDS and the three phosphonates were also compared for stain removal and dye damage in a full wash test in a washing machine using the same synthetic hard water. The results are summarized in Table 10.6 and showed that EDDS and DTPMP were comparable on stain removal followed by EDTMP, whereas HEDP gave very poor stain removal. On dye protection, EDDS clearly protected dyes better than DTPMP and EDTMP, whereas HEDP use resulted in significant amounts of dye damage. 

Chromosorb T shows the direct correlation of capacity with the oc-tanol-water partition coefficient expected of hydrophobic adsorbents (6). Its overall affinity for hydrophobic water contaminants is similar to that of Amberlite XAD-8 (Rohm and Haas), but it has additional affinity for humic acid and for water-soluble, cationic, aromatic dyes. Chromosorb T is more easily cleaned than the XAD resins, and it is more inert, contributing essentially no contaminants to eluates. Table IV illustrates the adsorption and recovery of a series of hydrophobic test solutes at 50 ppb in 8 L of synthetic hard water on a 50-mL bed of Chromosorb T. 

In column 110, it is also theoretically possible that glycine com-plexed with the added humic acid and that it was sequestered in the aqueous phase of the Teflon eluate and bound to the Teflon bed. To test this explanation, a 1/10-scale parfait column was constructed and 4 liCi of 14C-glycine, 40 fig total, was applied in 800 mL of synthetic hard water (column 123). In this experiment, the alcohol and solvent 1 conditioning washes were combined with the standard eluates of each bed before counting. These solutions were not concentrated before counting. Quench correction was by the channels ratio method. 

AGAIN, POUR 10 ml OF EACH SOLUTION INTO SEPARATE TEST TUBES. ADD 5 ml LIME-WATER TO EACH. SHAKE AND NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE IN THE AMOUNT OF FOAM MADE BY EACH SOLUTION IN THIS HARD" WATER. 

Hou (1992) used a simple screening test to determine whether acid and direct dyes precipitate at calcium concentrations typical of hard waters of the SE Piedmont region of the U.S. Of the 52 dyes tested, only three direct dyes (Direct Black 19, Direct Black 22, and Direct Blue 75) and seven acid dyes (Acid Red 88, Acid Red 114, Acid Red 151, Acid Brown 14, Acid Black 24, Acid Orange 8, and Acid Blue 113) precipitated. Although the Ca salts of acid and direct dyes were thought to be the most likely metal salts to precipitate after dye discharge to natural waters, the precipitation is not likely to occur unless dye concentrations exceed 0.02 to 0.6 mg/L, a level far greater than reported concentrations of dyes in surface waters. 

HMBC test is based on the U.S. EPA concept of Water Effect Ratio (WER), except that a bacterial response (MetPLATE) is used to determine metal bioavailability. Briefly, the methodology consists of spiking samples of both laboratory water (moderately hard water) and site water with a given metal and the mixtures are shaken for 60 min at 25°C. Afterwards, both mixtures are assayed for metal toxicity using MetPLATE. HMBC is determined as the ratio of IC50 of the metal in site water over IC50 of the metal in laboratory water. 

Hard water reactions. Place about one-third spatula full of the soap you have prepared in a 50-mL beaker containing 25 mL of water. Warm the beaker with its contents to dissolve the soap. Pour 5 mL of the soap solution into each of five test tubes (nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). Test no. 1 with 2 drops of a 5% solution of calcium chloride (5% CaCl2), no. 2 with 2 drops of a 5% solution of magnesium chloride (5% MgCl2), no. 3 with 2 drops of a 5% solution of iron(III) chloride (5% FeCl3), and no. 4 with tap water. Tube no. 5 will be used for a basicity test, which will be performed later. Record your observations on the Report Sheet. 

---