Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Flame separation

In mixtures near the limit, the shock wave and the flame separate momentarily, and the gases behind the shock are then the seat of vibratory phenomena, not only transverse but also longitudinal (of the same frequency as in the burnt gases). It would appear from this that such phenomena, but at even higher frequency, exist in the gas layer separating the shock wave and the flame of detonations propagating under conditions far removed from the limits, and that they play an important role in the coupling of the shock and the flame... [Pg.534]

For a very long time, since Faraday if not before, a qualitative conception has been established that the surface of a flame separates the region with oxygen and no fuel (the oxidation region) from the region without oxygen but with fuel (the recovery region). [Pg.304]

The study done by Stroud et al. [2] relates changes in burner configuration to changes in flame stability and the flame environment created above the burner for laminar, stoichiometric flame conditions incorporating the influence of crossflow resulting from impinging surface motion, which is a condition that is often seen in industry processes. As stated in Section 22.2.1, the optimal flame separation distance has been experimentally determined to be 1.25-2.25 mm [5] under conditions without impinging surface motion. Based on these results, one would expect that three or four typical ribbons between each row of ports would be optimal as each ribbon typically has a width of 0.5 mm. [Pg.453]

These results [2] suggest that a burner with a 1.5-2.0 mm (three- or four- ribbon) row separation distance and at least four ports is desirable to create a stable and uniform environment above the burner that is resistant to entrainment effects introduced due to impinging surface motion. These results are in agreement with the optimal flame separation distance previously determined by Pearson, Saunders, and Hargreaves [5]. [Pg.453]

STORAGE Keep in a tightly closed, stainless steel container in a cool, dry area away from heat and open flame separate from all other substances store under nitrogen. [Pg.147]

DISPOSAL AND STORAGE METHODS absorb in dry earth or sand, and place in a sanitary landfill dissolve in a flammable solvent and ignite in an incinerator equipped with afterburner and scrubber storage should be in tightly sealed containers away from heat and open flame separate from oxidizing materials, bases, water, and metal. [Pg.582]

DISPOSAL AND STORAGE METHODS manage whatever cannot be saved for recovery or recycling in an appropriate and approved waste disposal facility dispose of container and unused contents in accordance with federal, state and local requirements store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated location keep away form heat, sparks, and flame separate from strong oxidizing materials. [Pg.653]

DISPOSAL AND STORAGE METHODS absorb as much as possible in noncombustible materials such as dry earth, sand or vermiculite cautiously ignite small amounts in open areas atomize large amounts in a suitable combustion chamber with afterburner and scrubber store in a cool, dry place store in closed containers with adequate ventilation keep away from heat, sparks, and flame separate from acids, amines, alkalies, oxidizers, metal oxides, and combustibles outside storage preferred. [Pg.792]

DISPOSAL AND STORAGE METHODS starch may be disposed of in sealed containers in a secured, sanitary landfill storage should be in suitably protected and well-ventilated areas at ambient temperature avoid heat and open flame separate from strong oxidizers, acids, and bases. [Pg.907]

DISPOSAL AND STORAGE METHODS terphenyls may be disposed of by dissolving in a flammable solvent (such as alcohol) and atomizing in a suitable combustion chamber store in well closed containers in a well-ventilated area at room temperature keep away from heat or open flame separate from food and feedstuffs. [Pg.933]

Fig. 11. Spatial separation. Most complex flames involve a scsqaence of reactions. If these reactions have different rates, the flame separates into two or more regions. The tsrpical regions in a 0.1-atm methane-oxygen flame are delineated by plotting the flux of a species whose reaction is characteristic of that region methane for Zone I, carbon dioxide for Zone II, and oxygen atoms for Zone III. The transport region, where no reaction occurs, is Zone O. From Fristrom (1963c). Fig. 11. Spatial separation. Most complex flames involve a scsqaence of reactions. If these reactions have different rates, the flame separates into two or more regions. The tsrpical regions in a 0.1-atm methane-oxygen flame are delineated by plotting the flux of a species whose reaction is characteristic of that region methane for Zone I, carbon dioxide for Zone II, and oxygen atoms for Zone III. The transport region, where no reaction occurs, is Zone O. From Fristrom (1963c).
This scheme is used to ensure that burner pressure is kept within limits. Too high a pressure can result in the fuel velocity exceeding the flame velocity so that the flame separates from the burner tip and potentially extinguished. Too low a pressure on oil burners can result in poor atomisation of the fuel and thus poor combustion. By installing SP limits in the pressure controller, the heater is protected. If the high SP limit is reached the... [Pg.225]

The chromatogram can finally be used as the series of bands or zones of components or the components can be eluted successively and then detected by various means (e.g. thermal conductivity, flame ionization, electron capture detectors, or the bands can be examined chemically). If the detection is non-destructive, preparative scale chromatography can separate measurable and useful quantities of components. The final detection stage can be coupled to a mass spectrometer (GCMS) and to a computer for final identification. [Pg.97]

This type of analysis requires several chromatographic columns and detectors. Hydrocarbons are measured with the aid of a flame ionization detector FID, while the other gases are analyzed using a katharometer. A large number of combinations of columns is possible considering the commutations between columns and, potentially, backflushing of the carrier gas. As an example, the hydrocarbons can be separated by a column packed with silicone or alumina while O2, N2 and CO will require a molecular sieve column. H2S is a special case because this gas is fixed irreversibly on a number of chromatographic supports. Its separation can be achieved on certain kinds of supports such as Porapak which are styrene-divinylbenzene copolymers. This type of phase is also used to analyze CO2 and water. [Pg.71]

The hydrocarbons are separated in another column and analyzed by a flame ionization detector, FID. As an example, Figure 3.13 shows the separation obtained for a propane analyzed according to the ISO 7941 standard. Note that certain separations are incomplete as in the case of ethane-ethylene. A better separation could be obtained using an alumina capillary column, for instance. [Pg.72]

This justifies all the work undertaken to arrive at fuel denitrification which, as is well known, is difficult and costly. Moreover, technological improvements can bring considerable progress to this field. That is the case with low NO burners developed at IFF. These consist of producing separated flame jets that enable lower combustion temperatures, local oxygen concentrations to be less high and a lowered fuel s nitrogen contribution to NOj. formation. In a well defined industrial installation, the burner said to be of the low NO type can attain a level of 350 mg/Nm, instead of the 600 mg/Nm with a conventional burner. [Pg.269]

Sulphuric add test. To 0-5 g. of oxalic acid or of an oxalate, add I ml. of cone. H2SO4 and warm CO and COg are evolved (cf. formic acid). The CO burns with a blue flame. Detect the COg by passing the mixed gases evolved into lime-water. It is essential to test for the COj in a separate reaction, or (if the same test-tube is used) before testing for CO. [Pg.351]

Formation of nitrosaminey RgN NO. (a) From monomethylaniline. Dissolve I ml. of monomethylaniline in about 3 ml. of dil. HCl and add sodium nitrite solution gradually with shaking until the yellow oil separates out at the bottom of the solution. Transfer completely to a smdl separating-funnel, add about 20 ml. of ether and sh e. Run off the lower layer and wash the ethereal extract first with water, then with dil. NaOH solution, and finally with w ter to free it completely from nitrous acid. Evaporate the ether in a basin over a previously warmed water-bath, in a fume cupboard with no flames near. Apply Liebermann s reaction to the residual oil (p. 340). [Pg.376]

Place about 1 g. of the nitro-hydrocarbon in a boiling-tube and add 5 ml. of cone. HCl and several pieces of granulated tin. Warm the mixture and shake continuously to break up the oily drops of the nitro-compound. When all the oil has disappeared (about 3 minutes heating) pour off the liquid from any undissolved tin into a 100 ml. conical flask. Cool and add cautiously 30% aqueous NaOH solution until the precipitate formed redissolves to give a dark-coloured solution. Cool the latter thoroughly and shake well with about 15 ml. of ether. Separate the ethereal layer in a separating-funnel, wash with water and evaporate the ether in a basin on a previously heated water-bath in a fume-cupboard atoay from all flames. The residue is either... [Pg.385]

Fit a 750 ml. round-bottomed flask with a fractionating column attached to a condenser set for downward distillation. Place 500 g. of diacetone alcohol (the crude product is quite satisfactory), 01 g. of iodine and a few fragments of porous porcelain in the flask. Distil slowly. with a small free flame (best in an air bath) and collect the following fractions (a) 56-80° (acetone and a little mesityl oxide) (6) 80-126° (two layers, water and mesityl oxide) and (c) 126-131° (mesityl oxide). Whilst fraction (c) is distilling, separate the water from fraction (6), dry with anhydrous potassium carbonate or anhydrous magnesium sulphate, and fractionate from a small flask collect the mesityl oxide at 126-131°. The yield is about 400 g. [Pg.353]


See other pages where Flame separation is mentioned: [Pg.208]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.971]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.971]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.1911]    [Pg.3069]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.321]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.65 ]




SEARCH



Burners separated flame

Flame regions, separation

Separated flames

Separated flames

© 2024 chempedia.info