Exposure analysis modeling systems

EXAMS - The Exposure Analyses Modeling System was developed at EPA by Burns, Cline, and Lassiter (2 ) The model is based on the conservation of the mass of a chemical within a dynamic aquatic environment. The following equation can be used to mathematically describe the model. 

L.A. Burns and D.M. CUne, Exposure Analysis Modeling System Reference Manual for EXAMS2, EPA/600/3-85/038, NTIS Publication No. PB85-228138, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (1985). 

Prospectus on "Research and Development on an Exposure Analysis Modelling System (EXAMS) USEPA Athens, Ga., 1979. 

EPA. 1987a. Exposure analysis modeling system (EXAMSII). Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling, Ecosystems Research Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Athens, GA. 

Burns, L.A. Cline, D.M. Lassiter, R.R. "Exposure Analysis Modeling System (EXAMS) User Manual and System Documentation" U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory Athens, GA, 1981. 

Burns LA. 1997. Exposure analysis modeling system user s guide for EXAMS II, version 2.97.5. No. EPA/600/R-97/047. Washington (DC) US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, p 1-106. 

Schramm KW. 1990. Exams 2—Exposure analysis modeling system. Toxicol Environ Chem 26 73-82. 

Burns LA. Exposure analysis modeling system (EXAMS) User manual and system documentation. EPA/600/R-00/081 Sep 2000, Revision G (May 2004). 

The exposure analysis modelling system (EXAMS) is used to predict the distribution of residues in the various compartments of the aquatic system, including the water column and sediment pore waier. Model calculations using PBO-speeific data, specifically the physicochemical properties presented in Table 8-4, Indicate that 75r/r of the PBO from runoff is associated with particles, and... 

Excretion.. WADME studies Exposure analysis modelling system (EXAMS) 125-6, 72,5. 130 Exposure assessment 124 8 Extraction... 

Burns LH, Cline DM, Lassiter RR. 1981. Exposure analysis model system (EXAMS). (Draft). 

Perhaps most easy to overlook are spatial and temporal dependencies. For example, the hydrologic component of the pesticide root zone model-exposnre analysis modeling system (PRZM-EX AMS) treats mnltiple field plots over whole watersheds as independent, nnconpled, simple, 1-dimensional flow systems. In reality, the field plots are coupled systems that exhibit complex 3-dimensional water flow and pesticide transport (US SAP 1999). These higher order processes introduce spatial dependencies that may need to be considered in the assessment. Temporal autocorrelations are also likely when assessing exposure. 

In the eighties and early nineties, the USEPA evaluated dietary risk with an analysis method known as the Dietary Risk Evaluation System (DRES) (USEPA, 1991), which was based on the USDA s 1977 to 1978 National Food Consumption Survey. Consequently, dietary exposure assessments became genetically referred to as DRES analyses. Currently, the USEPA is using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM , Version 7.87) (Exponent, 2000), which allows exposure to be calculated from 1994 to 1996 CSFII along with the 1998 supplemental children s survey information. 

In many scenarios, the analysis of the anomaly system is treated as an or indivisible. Substantive feature of the system as a whole is that its properties are not trivial functions of the properties of its components. In contrast instantiation is carried out taking into account the relationships between the elements. Become critical in the process of reliability of the item and the need for taking into account external factors (environmental impact). The process of reliability system modeling is a fundamental operation requiring the designer knowledge and technical skills. Supports are mathematical models, system engineering and simulation tools. The final step is to perform simulation studies and locals. For the issue in the article problems OTE collections are man (operator behaviour), machine (device structures and mechanisms for proper operation) and exposure (resistance to destruction). 

The study of interface chemistry by surface analysis following exposure by chemical dissolution or mechanical sectioning methods will remain important, probably in parallel with studies on model systems. The acid-ba.se approach to adhesion is now widely accepted, and consequently the chemical information available from monochromated XPS will assume even greater importance. Together with this chemical approach will come an extension of the determination of adsorption isotherms by XPS or SSIMS to the minor constituents of commercial formulations, while molecular dynamics simulations will provide additional information. 

From the above examples it can be seen that the locus of failure generated by a mechanical test, either before or after environmental exposure is an uncertain route to exposing surfaces that will allow the elucidation of interface or interphase chemistry directly. In the following sections, a number of methods are described that allow the interfacial chemistry of adhesion to examine directly by analytical methods. They fall into two categories those in which a real interface is sectioned to allow surface analysis and other methods to probe the interfacial region, and those which make use of model systems, often in the form of very thin (<2 nm) films of adhesive where the interphase chemistry is directly accessible by surface analysis methods. 

On-line system. Provides support for exposure assessments of toxic substances. Includes chemical properly estimation techniques, siahsiical analysis, multi-media modeling, and graphics display (including models)... 

---