EXISTING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Electronics cleaning - For most uses in the electronics industry, ozone-depleting solvents can be replaced easily and, often, economically. A wide choice of alternatives exists. If technical specifications do not require postsolder cleaning, noclean is the preferred technology. If cleaning is required, the use of water-soluble chemistry has generally proved to be reliable. There are however limitations, whereby water-soluble chemistry is not suitable for all applications. 

This recommendation is totally worthless A few —how many What are the technical specifications Where To get better understanding —how By closing large gaps between existing wells By better installation of the wells By proper pumping tests ... 

The accelerator is used as radiation source in the development of new dosimetry systems (physical and chemical) and in the characterization of existing dosimeters in different conditions (a water cooled tantalum converter is used for the generation of X-ray and there is the possibility of controlling the temperature of small samples under irradiation). In Table I the technical specifications of the accelerator are reported. 

Conformance to the applicable provisions of this regulation will be the subject of those I C refurbishment project activities that relate to updating of the existing plant technical specifications and operational procedures during and after completion of the innovated I C systems implementation, and to testing of the installed new I C systems prior to the plant start-up after completion of the individual stages of the I C system refurbishment. 

When there are no specific Community provisions for safety of a product (i.e., EU laws and standards), a product may be deemed safe when it conforms to the specific rules of national law of the member state (i.e., national laws and standards). In the absence of Community and national rules for safety, then conformity may be based on national standards that are equivalent to a European standard or, where they exist, to Community technical specifications, or, failing these, member state standards or codes of good practice in the sector concerned or to the state of the art and technology to the safety that consumers may reasonably expect [see Standards in Chapter 3]. 

These cases happen when a systematic and permanent cause of deterioration of the leak proofing exists, for example the presence of paint on the internal surface of the ventilation conduits with a tendency to flake and therefore to deteriorate the leak proofing of the isolation valves. In other cases, a strict observance of the technical specification limits is reported both in as found and in as left conditions for long periods of operation of the plant. 

As discussed in Section 4.0 of this BIO, the documents that serve as the existing authorization basis for K-Reactor during Cold Standby and this BIO constitute the authorization basis for K-Reactor in Cold Standby. The BIO for K-Reactor in Cold Standby brings the authorization basis documents together by reference in one document. Additionally, the BIO provides supplementary information in areas such as DOE Order compliance, safety analyses, and additional administrative controls. This document, and the other BIOs discussed above, will be used to satisfy the K-Reactor Technical Specification requirement to update the SAR annually. After DOE proval of these BIOs (and any additional BIOs to cover additional missions), the authorization basis will consist of the present SAR and BIOs. 

Because the terminology used to characterize the chemistry of coal and coke in technical specifications is sometimes confusing, it is useful to clarify the relationships existing between the various terms and these are presented in Table 17.4. 

The guarantee force of the technical standard also places the latter in the position of assuming higher functions with legal implications. In the first place, the protection function of the safety standard should be mentioned. Since the standard determines specific requirements, it attempts to translate the protection of all who could be exposed to the hazards of the technical product into reality in the best possible manner. In this sense the standard, and this is part of its nature, in its statement and power of conviction is constantly subjected to new and better findings. To the same extent as new safety-technical knowledge develops and becomes established, the existing technical standard loses the claim to optimal realization of the desired protection. 

Existing analysis, technical specifications, system descriptions, operating procedures, equipment specifications, instrumentation and equipment qualification reports, etc. ... 

This chapter describes and illustrates the major types of containers used to transport and store compressed gases, including those liquefied at very low or cryogenic temperatures. To keep pace with developments in the industry, CGA, through its technical committees, continually reviews and recommends changes to existing container specifications promulgated by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) or Transport Canada (TC). Moreover, new specifications for compressed gas containers are also proposed from time to time. 

Shutdown margin, SDM, is the amount of negative reactivity that would be inserted into a reactor core if all rods were dropped from critical height. Technical specifications for a reactor specify the minimum value of SDM if all rods are inserted and if one rod remains stuck in the fully withdrawn position. Technical specifications also specify the maximum excess 3eactivity permitted in a core. Thus, as illustrated in Figure 6.3, a reactivity balance exists between the minimum required SDM and the maximum allowed In practice, the minimum SDM... 

This work is part of an ongoing effort to incorporate fine-grained parallelism models and constructs into existing programming languages, such as CPLEX (for C Parallel Language Extensions) [1], the C-h- "Technical Specification for C-h- Extensions for Parallelism" [2], or, the topic of this work, the tasklet model for Ada [3,4,5]. 

Worldwide experience indicates that in recent years the technical specifications of reclamation projects have become more stringent. No rational basis for such a trend exists as the intended use of this newly created land (i.e., functional requirements) has not changed significantly nor has an increase of failures been reported. In a number of cases this trend has led to inadequate and conflicting specifications, to construction requirements that could not be met and/or to excessive costs for... 

During an outage, safety equipment may or may not be available, but almost certainly will depend on human interaction for its initiation. Administrative barriers like Technical Specification may be vague or non existent. The operating support fi om instrumentation to proeedures and training may be inadequate. The disturbances to normal operation are typically more Sequent than for the power operation and caused by different initiators, mainly human interaction. 

The plant technical specifications are typically defining the pressure/temperature limitation which are applicable during shutdown operation. In addition, some plants have backfitted their technical specifications to prohibit the use of specific pumps (i.e. those with high head delivery) to fill the reactor, or require the operability of adequate relief capacity during periods when the increased risk of over-pressurisation exists. 

The third criterion evaluates whether the plant can be operated within the opierating envelope defined by the technical specifications. Both this criterion arid the fourth criterion call for a deterministic assessment of reactor safety by comparing potential plant conditions with existing safety analyses. The technical specifications provide the safety limits and limiting operational configurations. Challenging safety limits as a result of an identified issue would normally require corrective or compensatory action prior to restart. 

As a part of the Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ) review, the proposed activity must be evaluated to the criteria set forth in the Technical Specifications and the Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Seismic concerns and designs are both covered by the Technical Specifications and the SAR and are addressed by the USQ process. The procedure further requires that the USQ evaluation be approved by DOE prior to implementation of the activity when a USQ is determined to exist. The requirement to use the USQ process applies to all systems thereby enveloping the requirements of restart criterion 3. 

---