Project activities

The PM is probably ultimately responsible to make sure that all project activities are completed in accordance with requirements as outlined in the HASP. In some cases the PM may be required to perform at least one on-site safety review during the project. The PM is also responsible for making sure that all incidents are reported promptly and... 

Assign dedicated refinery personnel to be stationed in the engineering contractor s office to coordinate project activities and act as a liaison between the refinery and the contractor... 

With the exception of the Project Activity Monioring System (PAMS) which was developed on an IBM system under the CMS operating system using the FOCUS1 data base package, all of the applications discussed were developed and operate on a Digital PDP11/44 2... 

A 1.3 MW demonstration plant for utility applications was constructed by Ansaldo Ricerche, in cooperation with ENEA and AEM (the Municipal Energy Authority of Milan), and tested in Milan. Project activities were stopped in 1997 due to significant difficulties in reducing cost to the level needed for introduction into the market (1,000-1,500 /kW). 

Friedrich R (2007) Improving and applying methods for the calculation of natural and biogenic emissions and assessment of impacts to the air quality. Final project activity report 2007. http //natair.ier.uni-stuttgart.de/. Accessed March 2011... 

The following project activities described in Chapter 7 are also applicable to standard instruments, microcontrollers and smart instrumentation ... 

The qualification of the custom-built application must be performed according to normal software installation, operational and performance qualification practices. (Refer to Software Installation Qualification, System Operational Qualification, and System Performance Qualification in this chapter.) The following project activities depicted in Chapter 7 are applicable to custom-built systems ... 

The assessment of project activities may include performance and systems audits, data quality audits, peer review, PE samples, as appropriate for a given project. Assessment enables project personnel to identify field and laboratory problems or variances from the project scope and to implement timely corrective action. The findings and response actions originating from assessment activities are documented in reports to management. 

Verify financial stability of the laboratory laboratories have been known to go out of business without notifying the client, thus jeopardizing the course of project activities. 

From a perspective of the data user, a combination of audits and PE samples may be a cost-effective approach to laboratory quality assessment. Single-blind and double-blind PE samples are typically used on long-term, large sample volume projects. Because of the additional costs, they are not sent to the laboratory with every shipment of field samples. PE samples for the project contaminants of concern analyzed at the start of project activities will enable the data user to establish the laboratory s performance. Depending on the project duration and on the volume and importance of the collected samples, additional PE samples may be analyzed on a quarterly or semiannual basis. 

The DQAR may be part of a general report that details all project activities, findings, and conclusions, or be a separate document that becomes part of the permanent project record. Typically, the chemist who conducts DQA prepares the DQAR. The information needed for the DQAR preparation comprises field records, laboratory data, data evaluation summaries, sample data tabulated according to their use, and results of statistical testing. 

Archive all analytical data after the project activities have been completed and as the project enters into the closeout phase. 

Much of the insight and cost/economic projections were obtained through participation in and support of the Idaho National Laboratory and in particular the NGNP project activities. 

V). As illustrated in Fig. 1, without knowledge of Q, even the most accurate gas-phase reaction energy profiles are useless for projecting activation barriers AE for adsorbate transformations. 

Finally, following this risk assessment, the sorted scientific data will be subject to a risk benefit analysis. In risk benefit analysis, negative and positive aspects are weighed against each other, which may lead to, for example, measures with the aim to minimise risks and to maximise benefits. The project activities are summarised in Figure 2. 

Validation Plans should be maintained to reflect changes in project activities. Specific revisions to plans should be considered when transitioning between major project phases ... 

Are project activities and dehverables reviewed and audited by quality assurance personnel Is consistency maintained across different projects ... 

The validation life cycle is typically split into eight main qualification phases as shown in Table 21.2 and are all execnted under the control of a Validation Plan. It must be clearly demonstrated that the Qnality Assnrance (QA) fnnction of the pharmaceutical manufacturer is endorsing the validation approach for the implemented LIMS as docnmented in the Validation Plan. In its simplest form this will reqnire the QA representative to anthorize the Validation Plan and the subsequent key documents prodnced to support validation (e.g., Qnalification documentation. Reports, etc.). Table 21.2 shows the linkage between project activities and the QuaUflcation process, which will be under the control of the Validation Plan. 

The assessment activity should be identified in the control scheme project plan. The lapsed time, required resources, and effort required to complete this task will vary based on the specific control-scheme size and scope. The assessment team should involve individuals that have appropriate knowledge of the overall project activities and deliverables. Participants may include ... 

One of the major factors to be considered when implementing a GxP-compliant EDMS is validation. The basic validation approach is no different from that applied to other information management systems such as MRP 11 or Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS). An approach based on the validation life cycle in GAMP is appropriate. Figure 34.3 shows how validation documentation relates to typical project activities. Validation permeates all stages of the implementation process, as described below. 

Project Plan Similar to Quality Plan but including a detailed schedule of project activities and deliverables. [Defined for this book.]... 

As shown in Table 2.1, the project activities are divided into three well-defined parts ... 

The succeeding paragraphs summarize the project activities, discuss the Project Manager s participation, and emphasize the differences between small and major projects. 

PROJECT CONTROL IS A CONTINUUM AND IS EXERCISED THROUGH THE EFFECTIVE EXECUTION OF ALL PROJECT ACTIVITIES. 

---