Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Safety analysis reports

Safety analysis Report, NFS Reprocessing Plant, Docket-50-201, Nuclear Euel Services, Inc., Rockville, Md., 1973. [Pg.208]

In Chapter 4 we will diseuss the regulatory framework and analyti-eal tools to eonduet these assessments, sueh as JHA (job hazard analysis), job safety analysis (JSA), safety analysis reports, proeess hazard analysis (PHA), and job, task, and hazard analysis. The reader needs to understand that OSHAs view on physieal and ehemieal hazards is far reaehing, as stated in the HAZWOPER standard. Note the following examples. [Pg.9]

Final Safety Analysis Report (including all supplements, appendixes, and NRC questions and responses). [Pg.231]

FSAR - Final Safety Analysis Report (Chapter 15 is the accident analysis section in the FSAR standard format). [Pg.461]

DOE, 1994, Preparation Guide for U.S. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Safety Analysis Reports, DOE-STD-3009-94, July... [Pg.476]

In addition to these requirements, if a PrHA is conducted to satisfy safety analysis requirements of DOE Order 5480.23, "Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports," the resolution of action items must be documented to obtain approval of the safety analysis and the startup of the facility. In this case, the contractor may be required to satisfy specific safety criteria before an action item is considered resolved. [Pg.85]

Because a PrHA can require a substantial investment, it is important to identify potential overlap with other DOE hazard analysis requirements. This section provides a recommended approach for satisfying the PSM Rule and the related requirements of a nuclear safety analysis report (SAR). [Pg.89]

These topics are the subject of DOE Standard DOE-STD-1027-92, "Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23 Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports," which provides guidance for facility managers and Cognizant Secretarial Offices (CSOs). They are also discussed in the DOE Standard DOE-STD-3009-94,... [Pg.89]

U.S. Department of Energy, DOE Order 5480.23, "Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports," Washington, DC, April 1992. [Pg.91]

NRC (2007), Identification of Potential Hazards in Site Vicinity , Section 2.2.1-2.2.2 of Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, Report NUREG-0800, March. [Pg.361]

Whatley, V., Jr. Mahoney, D. J. Livingston, J. T. Safety Analysis Report - Packages, SRL 4.5-Ton Californium-Shipping Cask, USAEC Report DPSPU-74-124-6, Rev. 1, E. I. du Pont... [Pg.282]

Requirements on a Safety Analysis Report when Unloading SFAs during Implementation of FSV Lepse Complex Decommissioning Projecf ... [Pg.267]

SG "REQUIREMENTS ON A SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT WHEN UNLOADING SEAS DURING IMPLEMENTATION OF FSV LEPSE COMPLEX DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT" (SG-0I6-0I)... [Pg.268]

The Guides comprise the Gosatomnadzor s requirements on nuclear and radiation safety analysis report dming SNF imloading from FSV ""LepsE" storages. [Pg.268]

Safety Series No. 35-GI Safety Assessment of Research Reactors and Preparation of the Safety Analysis Report (1994). [Pg.348]

Lohse, G. E., Safety Analysis Report for the ICPP High-Level Solid... [Pg.53]

Al. American Electric Power Co. Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, 1968. [Pg.80]

The reactor to be discussed is the large FWR manufactured by the Westinghouse Electric Company, which has been built for the Diablo Canyon station of the Pacific Gas Electric Company, the Donald C. Cook station of American Electric Power Corporation, and the Zion station of Commonwealth Edison Company. Rated capacities of 3250 MW (thermal) and 1060 MW (electric) have been used. The following brief description of this reactor was abstracted from the Safety Analysis Report of the Doiudd C. Cook station [Al]. [Pg.105]

Allied-General Nuclear Services Final Safety Analysis Report, Barnwell Nuclear Fuel Plant Separations Facility, Oct. 1973. [Pg.556]

G3. General Electric Company Final Safety Analysis Report for Midwest Fuel Reprocessing Plant, Section 2 of Amendment 35 of Docket 50-268, Dec. 20, 1973. [Pg.558]

STAMPS, D.W., BENEDICK, W.B., TIESZEN, S.R., Hydrogen-Air-Diluent Detonation Study for Nuclear Reactor Safety Analysis, Report NUREG/CR-5525, SAND89-2398, Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, USA (1991). [Pg.246]

Hazard Analysis—The determination of material, system, process, and plant characteristics that can produce undesirable consequences, followed by the assessment of hazardous situations associated with a process or activity. Largely qualitative techniques are used to pinpoint weaknesses in design or operation of the facility that could lead to accidents. The Safety Analysis Report (SAR) hazard analysis examines the complete spectrum of potential accidents that could expose members of the public, on-site woikers, facility workers, and the environment to hazardous materials. [Pg.7]

DOE 0 420.1 Facility Safety Requires fire hazard analysis and natural phenomena analysis for all facilities. For Hazard Category 2 or 3 nuclear facilities only, requires a criticality safety evaluation. Criticality Safety Analysis Fire Hazard Analysis Effects of natural phenomena hazards on facility systems, structures, or components (SSCs) included as part of safety analysis documented in the Safety Analysis Report (SAR), Basis for Interim Operation (BIO), or Auditable Safety Analysis (ASA). [Pg.25]

DOE O 5480.23 Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports For nuclear facilities only (Hazard Category 3 or above), requires preliminary and final hazard categorization and comprehensive hazard/safety analysis to support the conclusion that nuclear facility activities can be conducted without causing unacceptable health or safety impacts to workers, public, or environment. SAR prepared in accordance with DOE-STD-3009 or a BIO prepared in accordance with DOE-STD-3011. Annual updates to either SAR or BIO for those changes that affect the safety basis. Preliminary and final hazard categorization prepared in accordance with DOE-STD-1027. [Pg.25]

The techniques used to complete PHAs inelude What-iF analyses. Explosive Safety Checklist Analyses, General Industry Checklist analyses and FMEA analyses. The information from Preliminary Hazards Analyses, previous Final Safety Analysis Report analyses. Fire Hazards Analyses, and other... [Pg.103]

DOE-STD-1027-92, Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE 0 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports . [Pg.172]


See other pages where Safety analysis reports is mentioned: [Pg.208]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.182]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.41 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.641 , Pg.803 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.41 ]




SEARCH



Analysis report

Safety report

Safety reporting

Safety, analyses

© 2024 chempedia.info