Exempting possession

It is recommended either that the provision of the Federal act which exempts from the prohibition on unauthorized possession, possession (1) for personal use (of the possessor) or a member of this household, (2) for administration to an animal owned by him or a member of his household and which puts the burden of proving that the possession was not for any of the purposes mentioned on unauthorized possession with a purpose to sell or otherwise dispose of a depressant or stimulant drug, but exempting possession (1) for the personal use of a member of the possessor s household, or (2) for administration to an animal owned by the possessor or a member of his household, should be included in any State legislation. State law should not prohibit simple possession or use. 

L Holders of state license to possess or purchase or firearms ID cards and who are exempt from NICS. 

In 1996, California voters enacted a ballot proposition called the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. This initiative exempted from California anti-marijuana laws a patient or his or her primary caregiver who cultivates or possesses marijuana for medical purposes, providing such use had been recommended by a physician. 

Previous sections have presented technical and historical information on radiation and chemical risk assessment and on classification of radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes. This information provides important perspectives for establishing the foundations of a new hazardous waste classification system. Before establishing these foundations, it is useful to specify the attributes that an ideal waste classification system should possess. The following sections identify the desirable attributes of a waste classification system including that the system should be risk-based, it should allow for exemption of waste, and it should be comprehensive, consistent, intrinsic, comprehensible, quantitative, compatible with existing systems, and flexible. These attributes should be recognized as goals that are not all likely to be fully realized in a practical waste classification system. 

Rocks, even in their solidity and massive deadness, were historical forms. The particular qualities that they possessed were an outcome of the mode and time of their formation. Nature could no longer be considered an eternal realm. It is not exempt from the modulating rhythms and decisive episodes that structure and restructure the human world. Hegel s philosophy accentuated temporality, process, development and change. It sidled towards evolutionary theory. 

It is recommended that unauthorized manufacture should not btj criminal offense unless it is done with purpose to sell or otherwl dispose of a controlled drug. Illicit manufacturers usually manufactu depressant or stimulant drugs" to distribute them. However, so controlled drugs may be made on a small scale for personal use. Thus is possible that some individuals may be making LSD solely for th own use. Many of the same reasons which support the exemption persons who without authorization possess controlled drugs solely fi their own use from criminal liabifity also support their exempt from criminal liability for unauthorized manufacture. Even more th possession, unauthorized manufacture is an offense preparatory... 

All chapters have been brought up to date in the new edition and in particular, there is extensive reference to various guidelines of the International Conference of Harmonization that have been issued since the first edition, in particular ICH E9, Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. A new chapter on pharmaco-genetics has been added. For the reader in possession of a first edition who wishes to know whether to splash out on a second, Figure P.l may be helpful. (This is partly so that I can underline the fact that nothing in life, not even an author s preface, should be exempt from statistics ) This compares the two editions chapter by chapter in terms of their length in thousands of words. 

The exemption from declarations under Article III for sea-dumped CW cannot be explained. It might be true that a detailed declaration could be difficult for some of the operations after World War II, however, on other declaration obligations, such as the declarations of past transfers of CW, the Convention requires such information to the extent possible. The main question is Why would states which have possessed CW in the past and later sea-dumped the munitions be unable to declare such activities ... 

Not all uses of radioisotopes require securing a license. There are many commercial products, such as watch dials and other self-luminous applications, and some types of smoke detectors that contain very small quantities of radioactive materials which the owner obviously does not require a license to possess. However, those who take advantage of exemptions must use no more than the exempt quantities listed in Schedule B, 10 CFR Section 30.71. In Table 5.4, the units are in microcuries. To convert to becquerels, multiply the number given in microcuries by 37,000. 

Notification is the mechanism that provides initial information to the regulatory body about the possession of a source or the intention to conduct a practice. The Basic Safety Standards [2] require that the regulatory system itself requires that any such possession of a source or intention to conduct a practice, unless exempted, be notified to the regulatory body. For those sources and sources within practices for which normal exposures are expected to be very small and the likelihood and magnitudes of potential exposures are negUgible, but which are not suitable for exemption for some reason (e.g. to prevent uncontrolled waste disposal), the regulatory body may only require notification. 

In any action or proceeding commenced prior to, on, or after August 8, 1956 [the date of enactment of this subsection], no employer shall be subject to any liability or punishment under this chapter or the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 [29 U.S.C. 251 et seq.] on account of his failure to comply with any provision or provisions of this chapter or such Act (1) with respect to work heretofore or hereafter performed in a workplace to which the exemption in section 213(f) [section 13(f)] of this title is applicable, (2) with respect to work performed in Guam, the Canal Zone or Wake Island before the effective date of this amendment of subsection (d), or (3) with respect to work performed in a possession named in section 206(a)(3) [section 6(a)(3)] of this title at any time prior to the establishment by the Secretary, as provided therein, of a minimum wage rate applicable to such work. 

Guidance The driver must only have in his/her possession a record of duty status for the day he/she does not qualify for the exemption. A driver must begin to prepare the record of duty status for the day immediately after he/she becomes aware that the terms of the exemption cannot be met. The record of duty status must cover the entire day, even if the driver has to record retroactively changes in status that occurred between the time that the driver reported for duty and the time in which he/she no longer qualified for the 100 air-mile radius exemption. This is the only way to ensure that a driver does not claim the right to drive 10 hours after leaving his/her exempt status, in addition to the hours already driven under the 100 air-mile exemption. 

The HazCom standard specifically exempts consumer products from coverage. OSHA will not Issue citations for possession and/or use of consumer products unless the compliance officer can show that the product was used in the workplace in a manner not intended by the manufacturer or the frequency and duration of use results in exposures that are significantly greater than those experienced by a normal consumer. 

The OSH Act covers employment in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and most remaining U.S. territories and possessions. However, there are certain jurisdictional hmits under the OSH Act. Operators of mines, as that term is defined in the Mine Act, are exempt under Section 4(b)(1) of the OSH Act because MSHA has primary jurisdiction. As mentioned above, MSHA is a separate agency within the Department of Labor, which regulates mining workplace and exercises authority to promulgate and enforce standards over such facilities, and its activities and powers are discussed in detail elsewhere in this book. 

Proof of medical qualifications (CDL holders). Beginning January 30, 2015, a driver required to have a commercial driver s license (CDL) under Part 383, and who submitted a current medical examiner s certificate to the state in accordance with 383.71(h) documenting that he or she meets the physical qualification requirements, no longer needs to cany on his or her person the medical examiner s certificate specified at 391.43(h). However, as a driver is waiting for the information to be entered into the CDL database by the state licensing office, he or she must carry a copy of the medical card as valid proof of medical certification. This medical certificate cannot be used as proof for more than 15 days after the date it was issued. A CDL driver who obtained a medical variance (i.e., exemption) from FMCSAmust continue to have in his or her possession the original or copy of that medical variance documentation at all times when on-duty. 

If driver meets neither of these exemptions, check his/her record of duty status, first noting time and date of last entiy. If log book is behind, ask driver to bring it up to date. No record of duty status in possession when one is required results in the driver placed out-of-service for eight (8) consecutive horns. 

When an inspector has knowledge and/or evidence that a driver is/is not in possession of a valid medical certificate, and is not in possession of any and all required exemptions for the following conditions vision, hearing, insulin-using diabetes, epilepsy or any other condition which is likely to cause loss of oonsoiousness or any loss of ability to control a commercial motor vehicle. (391.41(a)(1)) Declare driver out-of-service. 

This new type of ophthalmic formulations has to possess well defined properties in order to meet biopharmaceutical requirements such as be capable of delivering the effective ocular drug concentrations along an extended period of time (without inducing systemic side effects), user friendly, and exempt of side effects such as blurring, irritation, or foreign-body sensation. 

The first step for a facility to take in determining whether it is covered under CFATS is to review the exemptions. Unless a fecility is exempt, it must conduct a review to determine whether it possesses any chemicals of interest at or above the listed screening threshold quantities. The DHS has listed the security issue(s) associated with each chemical of interest each chemical presents at least one security issue, and some... 

---