Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron microscopy analysis

Sample Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis... [Pg.407]

Butterbach-Bahl K, Papen H, Rennenberg H. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the aerenchyma in two rice cultivars. Phyton. 2000 40 43-55. [Pg.205]

The structures seen in the ALH84001 meteorite could easily have formed from molten material solidifying rapidly or even by precipitation of minerals from saturated solutions. Neither explanation is as romantic as Martian nanobacteria. Similar sized features have been seen following electron microscopy analysis of basalt rock structures found in riverbeds, such as from the Columbia river (Figure 6.15). [Pg.178]

Hasle and Fryxell (1) developed the classical method of cleaning diatoms by acid treatment in the late 1960s. This technique is probably the most commonly used for both light and scanning electron microscopy analysis and can be found published in many current taxonomy and morphology papers such as Hasle (4) and Villac and Fryxell (5). Examples of cells prepared using the acid treatment method are pictured in Fig. 1. The method published by Hasle and Fryxell (1) involves the following steps, which should be carried out under a chemical fume hood ... [Pg.198]

The sfabilify of Pf particles during the 1.2 V hold has also been investigated. At 1.2 V and 80°C in 1 M H2SO4, up to 35% of the ECA was lost after 24 h. Transmission electron microscopy analysis of the tested catalysts found a growth in the Pt particle size distribution, suggesting that small Pt particles (-2 nm) are particularly susceptible to dissolution/agglomeration xmder steady-state voltage holds at 1.2 V. [Pg.34]

In many studies in which carbonyl compounds have been used as precursors in the preparation of catalysts there is no straightforward characterization in terms of the number of metallic atoms in the supported metaUic entities, there being uncertainties about true structural considerations. Analysis of the catalytic behavior is interpreted mainly in the Ught of electron microscopy analysis, and indirect characterization methods, such as infrared (IR) spectroscopic analysis of (de)carbonylation of the metal framework, and so on. [Pg.316]

Roskov KE, Epps TH, Berry BC, Hudson SD, Tureau MS, Fasolka MJ (2008) Preparation of combinatorial arrays of polymer thin films for transmission electron microscopy analysis. J Comb Chem 10 966-973... [Pg.102]

The particles synthesized were observed to agglomerate, probably due to effects induced by the electron microscopy analysis. [Pg.118]

Laird, D. (2001). Nature of clay-humic complexes in an agricultural soil II. Scanning electron microscopy analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. I. 65,1419-1425. [Pg.138]

L. A. Bonney and R. F. Cooper, Reaction Layer Interfaces in SiC-Fiber-Reinforced Glass Ceramics A High Resolution Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73[10], 2916-2921 (1990). [Pg.262]

Simon, C. Walmsley, J. Redford, K. Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis of Hybrid Coatings, Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Advanced Coating Technology, Nuremberg,... [Pg.427]

Ghadially EN, Lock CJL, Lalonde JMA, Ghadially R. Platinosomes produced in synovial membrane by platinum coordination complexes. Virchows Arch., B, Cell Pathol. 1981 35 123-131. Beretta GL, Righetti SC, Lombardi L, Zunino F, Perego P. Electron microscopy analysis of early localization of cisplatin in ovarian carcinoma cells. Ultrastruct. Pathol. 2002 26 331-334. Ruben GC. Ultrathin (Inm) vertically shadowed platinum-carbon replicas for imaging individual molecules in freeze-etched biological DNA and material science metal and plastic specimens. J. Electron. Microsc. Tech. 1989 13 335-354. [Pg.2178]

We thank R. Pitschke and Dr. J. Hartmann for electron microscopy analysis. The research work was supported by Volkswagen Foundation (Germany) and joint german-french LEA laboratory. [Pg.380]

Wolfs and Batist [121] have proposed a structure for these oxide mixtures comprising a core of Me Mo04 and Me 2(MoO)4 encapsulated inside a thin shell of bismuth molybdate. This model has been supported by recent transmission electron microscopy analysis in which a cross-section of a multicomponent bismuth molybdate catalyst was shown to comprise a surface layer of Bi2Mo30i2 supported on and encapsulating a core of Con/i2Fei/i2MoOx [107]. [Pg.252]

TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy) analysis. This analysis was done on a Philips 420T microscope (120kV, maximum resolution 5A) equipped with an EDAX PV9900 EDS. The catalysts were ground to a powder, embedded in epoxy resin and then microtomed with a diamond l fe to obtain sections about 300A thick. Images were taken at 100 kV. Diameters of about 100 isometric-shaped Pt crystallites were measured for each sample. [Pg.480]

Fig. 8. Image of the light-harvesting complex I of Rhodospirillum rubrum obtained by electron-microscopy analysis. Contours calculated from the 8.5 A projection maps obtained with frozen-hydrated two-dimensional crystals of the LH1 complex. The outermost contour represents the p-subunits and the next outermost the a-sub-units. The circle-like densities in the middle represent the BChl molecules. Inside the LH1 cylinder is a projection of the Rb. rubrum reaction center. The two parallel lines in the center represent the BChl special pair. The 20-A scale bar is at lower right. Figure source Karrasch, Burlough and Ghosh (1995) The 8.5 A projection map of the light-harvesting complex I from Rhodospirillum rubrum reveals a ring composed of 16 units. EMBO J 14 636. Fig. 8. Image of the light-harvesting complex I of Rhodospirillum rubrum obtained by electron-microscopy analysis. Contours calculated from the 8.5 A projection maps obtained with frozen-hydrated two-dimensional crystals of the LH1 complex. The outermost contour represents the p-subunits and the next outermost the a-sub-units. The circle-like densities in the middle represent the BChl molecules. Inside the LH1 cylinder is a projection of the Rb. rubrum reaction center. The two parallel lines in the center represent the BChl special pair. The 20-A scale bar is at lower right. Figure source Karrasch, Burlough and Ghosh (1995) The 8.5 A projection map of the light-harvesting complex I from Rhodospirillum rubrum reveals a ring composed of 16 units. EMBO J 14 636.
Figure 3. Freeze-fracture electron microscopy analysis of the vesicle size distribution in the case of the spontaneous vesiculation of oleic acid/oleate. (A) Vesicles formed from the hydrolysis of 25 mM oleic anhydride (overall concentration) at 30 °C, yielding 50 mM oleic acid/oleate. (B) Vesicles extruded throughout 50 nm diameter filters. (C) Vesicles formed upon hydrolyzing 20 mM oleic anhydride (same conditions as in A) in the presence of pre-added extruded vesicles B—all in 0.2 M bicine buffer pH 8.5. For details see ref. 8. Figure 3. Freeze-fracture electron microscopy analysis of the vesicle size distribution in the case of the spontaneous vesiculation of oleic acid/oleate. (A) Vesicles formed from the hydrolysis of 25 mM oleic anhydride (overall concentration) at 30 °C, yielding 50 mM oleic acid/oleate. (B) Vesicles extruded throughout 50 nm diameter filters. (C) Vesicles formed upon hydrolyzing 20 mM oleic anhydride (same conditions as in A) in the presence of pre-added extruded vesicles B—all in 0.2 M bicine buffer pH 8.5. For details see ref. 8.
Powder X-ray dififiaction patterns were recorded using Cu Ka (1.5418 A) radiation on a Philips 1050/81 vertical goniometer, fitted with a diffracted beam graphite monochromator. X-ray photoelectron experiments were carried out in a Escalab 200R (Fisons Instrumrats) using monochromatic A1 Ka radiation and operating at 10" Torr base pressure. Transmission electron microscopy analysis was performed in a JEOL lOOCX either by direct observation or after extractive replication of samples (support dissolution). [Pg.768]

Acknowledgements M. G. C. da Rocha acknowledges the finandal support of CNPq, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnoldgico of Brazil and the contributions of M. Brun, P. Delichere in the XPS experiments, G. Bergeret in XRD and C. Leclercq, F. Beauchesne in the electron microscopy analysis. [Pg.776]

Electron microscopy analysis was conducted using carbon replicas and thin foils. The carbon replicas were not of help for quantitative evaluation. Transmission electron microscopy of thin foils offered better results. For all the tested carbon combinations from the A to I labels, thin foils were produced for the heat treatment 450°C/30 h. The A14C3 particle size and the subgrain size were measured using the thin foils. The dispersed phase A14C3 particle size was measured on 200 to 300 thin foil structures, and it was constant and as small as 30 nm. The particle size was influenced neither by the carbon type nor by the heat treatment technology applied. [Pg.198]

Those results have been maked up, in the case of solid calcinated at 500°C by porosity measurement and by electronic microscopy analysis. [Pg.66]

The comparison of those results and the electronic microscopy analysis leads to the conclusion that the cesium is uniformly distributed on crystallite surface and that the excess of cesium is retained in the porosity of the solid, probably as amorphous cesium phosphate. [Pg.67]

Another difficulty is that often only very small amounts of these anisotropic moieties can be synthesized at a time, limiting the study of the self-assembly properties to transmission electron microscopy analysis [135]. This makes it difficult to study in detail the phase diagram in concentration, usually a fairly sample consuming process. However, different approaches are currently being devised that give a taste of the huge potential that the self-assembly of these nanowires and nanorods can lead to. [Pg.156]


See other pages where Electron microscopy analysis is mentioned: [Pg.146]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.758]   


SEARCH



Additive analysis scanning electron microscopy-energy

Analysis microscopy

Automated image analysis-scanning electron microscopy

Electron analysis

Electron microscopy chemical analysis

Electron microscopy energy-dispersive analysis

Electron microscopy image-analysis

Experimental transmission electron microscopy analyses

Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive Spectrometry Analyses

Scanning electron microscopy SEM analysis

Scanning electron microscopy analysis

Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive analysis using X-rays

Scanning electron microscopy cross-sectional analysis

Scanning electron microscopy image analysis

Scanning electron microscopy mixture analysis

Scanning electron microscopy structural analysis

Scanning electron microscopy surface analysis

Scanning electron microscopy with polarisation analysis

Scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis

Scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM

Surface analysis secondary electron microscopy-energy

Transmission electron microscopy TEM) analysis

Transmission electron microscopy particle size analysis

© 2024 chempedia.info