Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Creosote components

Once coal tar creosote is in the environment, both plants and animals can absorb parts of the creosote mixture. Some components of coal tar creosote have been found in plants exposed to creosote-treated wood in nearby soil. The plants absorb very little (less than 0.5% of the amount available to the plant). Animals such as voles, crickets, snails, pill bugs, and worms take up coal tar creosote components from the environment that are passed into the body through skin, lungs, or stomachs. Animals that live in the water, such as Crustacea, shellfish, and worms, also take up coal tar creosote compounds. For instance, mussels attached to creosote-treated pilings and... [Pg.19]

The derivation of the MRL is further complicated by the variability of the mixture s composition among wood creosote and coal tar creosote samples and the differences in mode of action of the individual components. The mixtures composition is dependent on the sources and preparation parameters of wood creosote and coal tar creosote and, as a result, the creosote components are rarely consistent in their type and concentration. Hence, toxicological evaluations of one creosote sample, for instance, are most likely inadequate for extrapolation to other creosote samples, unless their compositions are similar. An example of the composition variability among creosote samples was presented by Weyand et al. (1991). In that study, the concentrations of several PAHs were analyzed in four samples of manufactured gas plant (MGP) residue, a form of coal tar. All of the PAHs identified exhibited 2- to nearly 20-fold differences in concentration among the four samples. Benzo[a]pyrene, a component whose individual toxicity has been examined extensively, ranged from nondetectable levels (detection limit 0.3 g/kg) to 1.7, 6.4, and 3.9 g/kg of coal tar. Other studies that illustrate the variability of samples include Wrench and Britten (1975), Niemeier et al. (1988), and Emmett et al. (1981). [Pg.38]

In addition, although a great deal is known about the mechanisms of action for many of the individual components of creosote, the use of individual components to define the properties of the whole mixture may or may not supply adequate information upon which risk from exposure to the whole can be appropriately assessed. An excellent example of this is presented by Warshawsky et al. (1993), who reported that the carcinogenicity for mice of specific coal tar creosote components mixed in different formulations differed in incidence and latency of appearance from their individual carcinogenicities. For instance, coal tar in toluene, which was determined to contain 0.0006% B[a]P, produced tumors in 51% of mice with a latent period of 73 weeks. In contrast, the same concentration of B[a]P administered in toluene without coal tar did not produce tumors. The addition of another solvent, n-dodecane, resulted in... [Pg.195]

Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion. Studies monitoring the pharmacokinetics of the coal tar creosote mixture are limited. Much of the information regarding the disposition of creosote is based on indirect evidence or the pharmacokinetic information available on a single class of creosote components, the PAHs. For more information on the toxicokinetics of PAHs, please refer to the ATSDR... [Pg.222]

Absorption of creosote occurs following all routes of exposure. The presence of creosote components in tissues and the presence of metabolites in urine are evidence of its absorption. However, no studies are available that quantify the extent and rate of creosote absorption. Studies in humans regarding the distribution of creosote are not available and little information is available for animals. Its distribution is based on assumptions derived from studies that monitored the distribution of PAHs, components of creosote. [Pg.222]

The pharmacokinetics of creosote have not been defined because of the chemical complexity of these mixtures. Information on individual components is not sufficient to define the properties of the mixture and for this reason no PBPK models have been proposed for creosote. Individual components of creosote are metabolized by several different enzyme systems including phase I and phase II enzymes. Human polymorphisms are known to exist for many of these enzymes and are likely to affect the relative toxicity of creosote for these individuals. The relative activity of metabolic enzymes may also vary with the age of the individual, which will again affect the relative toxicity of particular components of creosote for old or young individuals. However, the interactions taking place when creosote components are metabolized are likely to be extremely complex so that information on age-related activity of any particular enzyme will probably not be very informative as to differential toxicity of the mixture. [Pg.224]

The composition of the creosote mixture is dependent on the sources and preparation parameters of the coal tar, and as a result the creosote components are rarely consistent in their type and concentration. An example of the composition variability among creosote samples was recently presented by Weyand et al. (1991). In that study, the concentrations of several PAHs were analyzed in four coal tars. All of the PAHs identified exhibited 2-fold to nearly 20-fold differences in concentration among the four samples. [Pg.232]

Coal tar creosote components may also be slowly released from the surface of treated wood products by oil exudation, leaching by rain water, or volatilization. Losses of creosote from impregnated wood are dependent on the kind of coal used to produce the coal tar, the kind of coke oven used to make the coal tar, and the conditions under which the wood is used (Leach and Weinert 1976). [Pg.250]

On a hot, sunny day evaporation of creosote from the surface of treated wood may release coal tar creosote constituents to the atmosphere. Only the volatile creosote components such as acenaphthene and naphthalene will volatilize the heavier fractions will remain on the wood (E1SDA 1980). Volatilization may also be greater during warmer months when ambient temperatures are higher. Gevao and Jones (1998) observed greater volatilization of acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, and fluoranthene from creosote-treated wood at 30 °C than at 4 °C. [Pg.253]

In a terrestrial microcosm study, release of 14C-labeled creosote components to the atmosphere from treated wood accounted for 1.0% of total acenaphthene and 1.4% of phenanthrene, whereas 93.5 and 95% of these components, respectively, were retained in the wood (Gile et al. 1982). [Pg.253]

In an investigation of the extent of creosote contamination at four wood-preservative plants with process water surface impoundments, unspecified creosote components were found to have moved 20-60 feet vertically from the impoundments to the water table and up to 500 feet horizontally from the sources (Ball 1987). [Pg.258]

Limited uptake of some creosote constituents has been detected in plants exposed to creosote-treated wood in nearby soil. Only 0.04% of applied acenaphthene and 0.1% of phenanthrene partitioned to plant tissue in one study (Gile et al. 1982). While systemic uptake may be minimal, such coal tar creosote components as PAHs can adsorb to plant roots or surfaces. This seems a common way that vegetables or other produce for human consumption can pick up trace amounts of creosote materials (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 1995). [Pg.259]

Little information was found in the available literature concerning the transformation of wood or coal tar creosote components in the atmosphere. Some volatile coal tar constituents may undergo oxidation by vapor phase reaction with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals, with calculated half-lives of 2 hours to 10 days based on experimental and estimated rate constants of 1.12-103xl012 cm/molecules-second at 25 °C and using an average atmospheric hydroxyl radical concentration of 5x10s molecules/cm3 (Atkinson 1989 Meylan and Howard 1993). Rates may be slowed since some components will exist as... [Pg.259]

Coal tar creosote components are slowly released from treated wood products by oil exudation, rainwater leaching, and by volatilization of the lighter fractions (Henningsson 1983). USDA (1980) reported that the major components of creosote were not detected in soil samples taken to a depth of 6 inches within 2-24 inches from treated poles, presumably as a result of biotransformation of mobilized components by soil microorganisms. Creosote components released to soils in waste water effluents have been found to be biotransformed by soil microbes under aerobic conditions (Middleton 1984). Bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas isolated from a creosote-contaminated waste site have been reported to degrade creosote-derived quinoline (Bennett et al. 1985). Acclimation to creosote phenolic constituents by soil microorganisms has also been demonstrated (Smith et al. 1985). [Pg.262]

In 1996, there were 25,000 workers employed in 75-100 domestic wood treatment plants using coal tar creosote. As a result of the use of engineering controls and personal protective equipment (e.g., respiratory protection and impervious gloves) required in the 1986 settlement of the EPA Special Review process,1 airborne exposures to creosote components in the workplace are generally below the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 0.2 mg benzene soluble particulates perm3 air (Rivers 1990). [Pg.270]

Individuals who apply coal tar creosote directly to wood, including farmers, carpenters, and homeowners who come in contact with creosote-treated wood products, are believed to be exposed to the highest levels of creosote components via inhalation and dermal contact. It has been estimated that historically about 4,000 workers may have been routinely exposed and up to 50,000 people may have been intermittently exposed to coal tar creosote through its application as a preservative to wood products (USDA 1980). [Pg.279]

Physical and Chemical Properties. Limited physical property data, such as boiling point and density (see Table 4-2), are available for the coal tar creosote mixture. Additional physical and chemical property data, such as water solubility, vapor pressure, Koc, and Henry s law constant values would be useful in order to predict the partitioning and transformation of coal tar creosote components in air, water, and soil. These values are currently not available because their determination is complicated by the fact that creosote is a mixture of variable composition. However, data on vapor pressure, water solubility, etc., are available for individual components of creosote, and these can be used to estimate the behavior of creosote. [Pg.281]

Bioavailability from Environmental Media. Very limited information was found in the available literature regarding the uptake of creosote components by living organisms from contaminated water and soil at hazardous waste sites. Studies have been done with persistent constituents (e.g., PAHs) which show that plant uptake from soils is limited (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 1995 ... [Pg.283]

Gile et al. 1982), whereas bioconcentration in aquatic organisms from contaminated surface waters has been demonstrated. Data from human and animal studies indicate that creosote components are absorbed following ingestion or inhalation, or after dermal contact with the mixture. Additional data on the bioavailability of creosote components following ingestion or inhalation of creosote-contaminated soils would be helpful. Of particular importance are data on the bioavailability of the HMW PAHs that may persist in soil and are resistant to many bioremediation techniques. [Pg.283]

Exposure Levels in Humans. A population exists that is potentially exposed to creosote through contact with contaminated media at hazardous waste sites and with treated wood products. A second potentially exposed workforce population exists at wood treatment facilities and in other industries in which creosote-derived products are produced or used. Currently, no information exists that demonstrates tissue levels of any components of the mixture in these populations. Although exposure is now estimated in occupationally exposed workers using urinary concentrations of biomarkers, such as 1 -hydroxypyrcnc, actual exposure levels are harder to determine. Estimates of human exposure to creosote constituents, or body burdens of creosote components, are complicated by the lack of information on exposure to creosote constituents and levels of creosote-derived components in the environment. Collecting information on tissue levels of creosote components in humans would be necessary to examine the relationship between levels of creosote-derived compounds in the environment, human tissue levels, and subsequent development of health effects. This information is necessary for assessing the need to conduct health studies on these populations. [Pg.284]

Dusich K, Sigurdson E, Hall WN, et al. 1980. Cancer rates in a community exposed to low levels of creosote components in municipal water. Minnesota Med 803-806. [Pg.318]

Coal tar creosote is a brownish-black/yellowish-dark green oily liquid with a characteristic sharp odor, obtained by the fractional distillation of crude coal tars. The approximate distillation range is 200°C-400°C (390°F-750°F). The chemical composition of creosotes is influenced by the origin of the coal and also by the nature of the distilling process as a result, the creosote components are rarely consistent in their type and concentration. [Pg.721]


See other pages where Creosote components is mentioned: [Pg.126]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.284]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.308 ]




SEARCH



Creosote

© 2024 chempedia.info