Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cosurfactant

The type of behavior shown by the ethanol-water system reaches an extreme in the case of higher-molecular-weight solutes of the polar-nonpolar type, such as, soaps and detergents [91]. As illustrated in Fig. Ul-9e, the decrease in surface tension now takes place at very low concentrations sometimes showing a point of abrupt change in slope in a y/C plot [92]. The surface tension becomes essentially constant beyond a certain concentration identified with micelle formation (see Section XIII-5). The lines in Fig. III-9e are fits to Eq. III-57. The authors combined this analysis with the Gibbs equation (Section III-SB) to obtain the surface excess of surfactant and an alcohol cosurfactant. [Pg.69]

A beautiful and elegant example of the intricacies of surface science is the formation of transparent, thermodynamically stable microemulsions. Discovered about 50 years ago by Winsor [76] and characterized by Schulman [77, 78], microemulsions display a variety of useful and interesting properties that have generated much interest in the past decade. Early formulations, still under study today, involve the use of a long-chain alcohol as a cosurfactant to stabilize oil droplets 10-50 nm in diameter. Although transparent to the naked eye, microemulsions are readily characterized by a variety of scattering, microscopic, and spectroscopic techniques, described below. [Pg.516]

Cationic surfactants may be used [94] and the effect of salinity and valence of electrolyte on charged systems has been investigated [95-98]. The phospholipid lecithin can also produce microemulsions when combined with an alcohol cosolvent [99]. Microemulsions formed with a double-tailed surfactant such as Aerosol OT (AOT) do not require a cosurfactant for stability (see, for instance. Refs. 100, 101). Morphological hysteresis has been observed in the inversion process and the formation of stable mixtures of microemulsion indicated [102]. [Pg.517]

While most vesicles are formed from double-tail amphiphiles such as lipids, they can also be made from some single chain fatty acids [73], surfactant-cosurfactant mixtures [71], and bola (two-headed) amphiphiles [74]. In addition to the more common spherical shells, tubular vesicles have been observed in DMPC-alcohol mixtures [70]. Polymerizable lipids allow photo- or chemical polymerization that can sometimes stabilize the vesicle [65] however, the structural change in the bilayer on polymerization can cause giant vesicles to bud into smaller shells [76]. Multivesicular liposomes are collections of hundreds of bilayer enclosed water-filled compartments that are suitable for localized drug delivery [77]. The structures of these water-in-water vesicles resemble those of foams (see Section XIV-7) with the polyhedral structure persisting down to molecular dimensions as shown in Fig. XV-11. [Pg.549]

The locations of the tietriangle and biaodal curves ia the phase diagram depead oa the molecular stmctures of the amphiphile and oil, on the concentration of cosurfactant and/or electrolyte if either of these components is added, and on the temperature (and, especially for compressible oils such as propane or carbon dioxide, on the pressure (29,30)). Unfortunately for the laboratory worker, only by measuriag (or correcdy estimatiag) the compositions of T, Af, and B can one be certain whether a certain pair of Hquid layers are a microemulsion and conjugate aqueous phase, a microemulsion and oleic phase, or simply a pair of aqueous and oleic phases. [Pg.148]

Eigure 6 illustrates how the three tensions among the top, middle, and bottom phases depend on temperature for a system of nonionic surfactant—oil—water (38), or on salinity for a representative system of anionic surfactant—cosurfactant—oil—water and electrolyte (39). As T approaches from lower temperatures, the composition of M approaches the composition of T, and the iaterfacial teasioa betweea them, goes to 2ero at T =. ... [Pg.151]

However, in the case of mini- and microemulsions, processing methods reduce the size of the monomer droplets close to the size of the micelle, leading to significant particle nucleation in the monomer droplets (17). Intense agitation, cosurfactant, and dilution are used to reduce monomer droplet size. Additives like cetyl alcohol are used to retard the diffusion of monomer from the droplets to the micelles, in order to further promote monomer droplet nucleation (18). The benefits of miniemulsions include faster reaction rates (19), improved shear stabiHty, and the control of particle size distributions to produce high soHds latices (20). [Pg.23]

In the 1990s, the thmst of surfactant flooding work has been to develop surfactants which provide low interfacial tensions in saline media, particularly seawater require less cosurfactant are effective at low concentrations and exhibit lower adsorption on rock. Nonionic surfactants such as alcohol ethoxylates, alkylphenol ethoxylates (215) and propoxylates (216), and alcohol propoxylates (216) have been evaluated for this appHcation. More recently, anionic surfactants have been used (216—230). [Pg.194]

Cosurfactant requirements can be minimized usiag a surfactant having a short-branched hydrophobe or a branched-alkyl substituent on an aromatic group (232,234) and a long ethoxy group chain (234). Blends of surfactants optimized for seawater or reservoir brine salinity include linear alkyl xylene sulfonate—alcohol ether sulfate mixtures (235). [Pg.194]

These surfactants, in conjunction with soap, produce bars that may possess superior lathering and rinsing in hard water, greater lather stabiUty, and improved skin effects. Beauty and skin care bars are becoming very complex formulations. A review of the Hterature clearly demonstrates the complexity of these very mild formulations, where it is not uncommon to find a mixture of synthetic surfactants, each of which is specifically added to modify various properties of the product. Eor example, one approach commonly reported is to blend a low level of soap (for product firmness), a mild primary surfactant (such as sodium cocoyl isethionate), a high lathering or lather-boosting cosurfactant, eg, cocamidopropyl betaine or AGS, and potentially an emollient like stearic acid (27). Such benefits come at a cost to the consumer because these materials are considerably more expensive than simple soaps. [Pg.158]

Amoco developed polybutene olefin sulfonate for EOR (174). Exxon utilized a synthetic alcohol alkoxysulfate surfactant in a 104,000 ppm high brine Loudon, Illinois micellar polymer small field pilot test which was technically quite successful (175). This surfactant was selected because oil reservoirs have brine salinities varying from 0 to 200,000 ppm at temperatures between 10 and 100°C. Petroleum sulfonate apphcabdity is limited to about 70,000 ppm salinity reservoirs, even with the use of more soluble cosurfactants, unless an effective low salinity preflush is feasible. [Pg.82]

For the separation of amino acids, the applicability of this principle has been explored. For the separation of racemic phenylalanine, an amphiphilic amino acid derivative, 1-5-cholesteryl glutamate (14) has been used as a chiral co-surfactant in micelles of the nonionic surfactant Serdox NNP 10. Copper(II) ions are added for the formation of ternary complexes between phenylalanine and the amino acid cosurfactant. The basis for the separation is the difference in stability between the ternary complexes formed with d- or 1-phenylalanine, respectively. The basic principle of this process is shown in Fig. 5-17 [72]. [Pg.145]

Various initiation strategies and surfactant/cosurfactant systems have been used. Early work involved in situ alkoxyamine formation with either oil soluble (BPO) or water soluble initiators (persulfate) and traditional surfactant and hydrophobic cosurfactants. Later work established that preformed polymer could perform the role of the cosurfactant and surfactant-free systems with persulfate initiation were also developed, l90 222,2i3 Oil soluble (PS capped with TEMPO,221 111,224 PBA capped with 89) and water soluble alkoxyamines (110, sodium salt""4) have also been used as initiators. Addition of ascorbic acid, which reduces the nitroxide which exits the particles to the corresponding hydroxylamine, gave enhanced rates and improved conversions in miniemulsion polymerization with TEMPO.225 Ascorbic acid is localized in the aqueous phase by solubility. [Pg.482]

As will be explained later, the presence of a cosurfactant can have a significant effect on the Ca(LAS)2 precipitation boundary [37]. [Pg.123]

In combination with alkyl ether sulfates, a synergistic decrease of the irritation level of the ether sulfates and an improvement of the foam stabilization has been described [57,67,78]. A good compromise between mildness and foam properties could be achieved with lauryl ether carboxylic acid sodium salt with 10 mol EO [57,67]. In several articles examples of the use of alkyl ether carboxylates as cosurfactant in mild shampoos as well as bath and shower products have been described [57,69,79]. [Pg.337]

Ci2-Ci3 ether carboxylic acid with 4.5-6 mol EO and Ci2-C15 ether carboxylic acid with 9 mol EO as cosurfactant improve the use of alkyl-o-xylene-sulfonate as primary surfactant at different salinity while maintaining good oil solubilization [189]. It is possible to optimize the surfactant system in relation to the crude oil reservoir characteristics. [Pg.343]

TABLE 15 Eye Irritation According to the Draize Test of Alkyl Ether Carboxylates Compared to Other Mild Cosurfactants ... [Pg.351]

FIG. 7 Skin irritation according to the human patch test of alkyl ether carboxylic acids compared to other mild cosurfactants. CFTA-names 1, cocamidopropylbetaine 2, sodium PEG-6 cocamide carboxylate 3, sodium laureth-11 carboxylate 4, cocoamphocarboxypropionate 5, protein hydrolyzate 6, disodium laureth-3 sulfo-succinate SLES, sodium laureth sulfate. (From Ref. 68.)... [Pg.351]

Meijer [68] describes low skin and eye irritation values compared to several other mild cosurfactants (Table 15 and Fig. 7). These amidether carboxylates have an NDELA content below detection level of 10 ppb because they are produced by using monoethanolamine. [Pg.352]

On a laboratory scale it has been shown that IOS can be used in LDLs [8], in HDPs [8-10], and in various other cleaning formulations. On the industrial side, IOS has been applied as a cosurfactant in caustic flooding formulations to enhance oil recovery [11]. [Pg.365]

IOS has been studied as a suitable cosurfactant in caustic flooding operations [11]. A field pilot test at White Castle (Texas) which used a blend of IOS 1720 and IOS 2024 was considered to be a technical success. [Pg.428]

A microemulsion (p.E) is a thermodynamically stable, transparent (in the visible) droplet type dispersion of water (W) and oil (O a saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbon) stabilized by a surfactant (S) and a cosurfactant (CoS a short amphiphile compound such as an alcohol or an amine) [67]. Sometimes the oil is a water-insoluble organic compound which is also a reactant and the water may contain mineral acids or salts. Because of the small dispersion size, a large amount of surfactant is required to stabilize microemulsions. The droplets are very small (about 100-1000 A [68]), about 100 times smaller than those of a typical emulsion. The existence of giant microemulsions (dispersion size about 6000 A) has been demonstrated [58]. [Pg.281]

The diastereoselection of the Diels Alder reaction of methyl acrylate with cyclopentadiene was investigated [74] in microemulsions prepared with isooctane oil, CTAB as surfactant and 1-butanol as cosurfactant, and the results were compared with those found in pure solvents and water (Table 6.12). In emulsions rich in 1-butanol and formamide (entries 1 and 4) the reaction was slow (72 h) and the diastereoselectivity was practically the same as that... [Pg.282]

Examples of other frequently used surfactants that able to form reversed micelles without the addition of cosurfactants are didodecyldimethyl ammonium bromide [17], do-decylammonium propionate, benzyldimethylhexadecyl ammonium chloride [18], lecithin [19], tetraethyleneglycol monododecylether (C12E4) [20], decaglycerol dioleate [21], do-decylpyridinium iodide [22], and sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate [23],... [Pg.475]

MEEKC is a CE mode similar to MEKC, based on the partitioning of compounds between an aqueous and a microemulsion phase. The buffer solution consists of an aqueous solution containing nanometer-sized oil droplets as a pseudo-stationary phase. The most widely used microemulsion is made up of heptane as a water-immiscible solvent, SDS as a surfactant and 1-butanol as a cosurfactant. Surfactants and cosurfactants act as stabilizers at the surface of the droplet. [Pg.349]

Ethoxylated methylcarboxylates Propoxyethoxy glyceryl sulfonate Alkylpropoxyethoxy sulfate as surfactant, xanthan, and a copolymer of acrylamide and sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate Carboxymethylated ethoxylated surfactants (CME) Polyethylene oxide (PEG) as a sacrificial adsorbate Polyethylene glycols, propoxylated/ethoxylated alkyl sulfates Mixtures of sulfonates and nonionic alcohols Combination of lignosulfonates and fatty amines Alkyl xylene sulfonates, polyethoxylated alkyl phenols, octaethylene glycol mono n-decyl ether, and tetradecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride Anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), cationic tetradecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (TTAC), nonionic pentadecylethoxylated nonylphenol (NP-15), and nonionic octaethylene glycol N-dodecyl ether Dimethylalkylamine oxides as cosurfactants and viscosifiers (N-Dodecyl)trimethylammonium bromide Petrochemical sulfonate and propane sulfonate of an ethoxylated alcohol or phenol Petrochemical sulfonate and a-olefin sulfonate... [Pg.198]

Various bacterial species have proven useful in MEOR. The principle is based on the species biochemical byproducts produced, such as gases, surfactants, solvents, acids, swelling agents, and cosurfactants, which facilitate the displacement of oil. In field experiments, in situ fermentation is often desirable for producing a great quantity of gases. Clostridium hydrosulfuricum 39E was found to have surface-active properties during simulated enhanced oil recovery experiments [1874]. [Pg.221]

M. R. Islam and A. Chakma. Mathematical modelling of enhanced oil recovery by alkali solutions in the presence of cosurfactant and polymer. / Plefro/ Sci Eng, 5(2) 105-126, February 1991. [Pg.408]

Electrochemical redox studies of electroactive species solubilized in the water core of reverse microemulsions of water, toluene, cosurfactant, and AOT [28,29] have illustrated a percolation phenomenon in faradaic electron transfer. This phenomenon was observed when the cosurfactant used was acrylamide or other primary amide [28,30]. The oxidation or reduction chemistry appeared to switch on when cosurfactant chemical potential was raised above a certain threshold value. This switching phenomenon was later confirmed to coincide with percolation in electrical conductivity [31], as suggested by earlier work from the group of Francoise Candau [32]. The explanations for this amide-cosurfactant-induced percolation center around increases in interfacial flexibility [32] and increased disorder in surfactant chain packing [33]. These increases in flexibility and disorder appear to lead to increased interdroplet attraction, coalescence, and cluster formation. [Pg.252]

Another example of chemical-potential-driven percolation is in the recent report on the use of simple poly(oxyethylene)alkyl ethers, C, ), as cosurfactants in reverse water, alkane, and AOT microemulsions [27]. While studying temperature-driven percolation, Nazario et al. also examined the effects of added C, ) as cosurfactants, and found that these cosurfactants decreased the temperature threshold for percolation. Based on these collective observations one can conclude that linear alcohols as cosurfactants tend to stiffen the surfactant interface, and that amides and poly(oxyethylene) alkyl ethers as cosurfactants tend to make this interface more flexible and enhance clustering, leading to more facile percolation. [Pg.252]

As described in the introduction, certain cosurfactants appear able to drive percolation transitions. Variations in the cosurfactant chemical potential, RT n (where is cosurfactant concentration or activity), holding other compositional features constant, provide the driving force for these percolation transitions. A water, toluene, and AOT microemulsion system using acrylamide as cosurfactant exhibited percolation type behavior for a variety of redox electron-transfer processes. The corresponding low-frequency electrical conductivity data for such a system is illustrated in Fig. 8, where the water, toluene, and AOT mole ratio (11.2 19.2 1.00) is held approximately constant, and the acrylamide concentration, is varied from 0 to 6% (w/w). At about = 1.2%, the arrow labeled in Fig. 8 indicates the onset of percolation in electrical conductivity. [Pg.260]

FIG. 8 Low-frequency conductivity (a) of water, toluene, and AOT reverse microemulsions at 25°C as a function of acrylamide (cosurfactant) concentration, (wt%). The Op and arrow at f = 1.2% shows the approximate onset of percolation in low-frequency conductivity. [Pg.260]

FIG. 9 Measured self-diffusion coefficients at 25°C for toluene (A), water ( ), acrylamide ( , and AOT ( ) in water, toluene, and AOT reverse microemulsions as a function of cosurfactant (acrylamide) concentration, f (wt%). The breakpoint at about 1.2% acrylamide approximately denotes, the onset of percolation in electrical conductivity. [Pg.261]


See other pages where Cosurfactant is mentioned: [Pg.517]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.253]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 , Pg.67 , Pg.72 , Pg.73 , Pg.78 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.270 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.383 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.104 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 , Pg.37 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.496 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.184 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.43 , Pg.701 , Pg.735 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.202 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.577 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.107 , Pg.223 , Pg.227 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.4 , Pg.5 , Pg.6 , Pg.11 , Pg.14 , Pg.18 , Pg.21 , Pg.22 , Pg.23 , Pg.26 , Pg.29 , Pg.30 , Pg.33 , Pg.43 , Pg.46 , Pg.48 , Pg.49 , Pg.69 , Pg.248 , Pg.249 , Pg.250 , Pg.251 , Pg.252 , Pg.258 , Pg.268 , Pg.275 , Pg.502 , Pg.507 , Pg.514 , Pg.517 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.252 , Pg.266 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.240 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.54 , Pg.55 , Pg.60 , Pg.78 ]




SEARCH



Cosurfactant effect

Cosurfactant micelles

Cosurfactant microemulsions

Cosurfactant molecules

Cosurfactant, definition

Cosurfactant/surfactant ratio

Cosurfactants

Cosurfactants

Cosurfactants partitioning

Cosurfactants pseudoternary phase diagram

Cosurfactants, in microemulsion

Gibbs cosurfactants

Interactions surfactant-cosurfactant

Ionic surfactant-cosurfactant system

Microemulsions cosurfactants

Monomer role cosurfactant

Oil/water/surfactant/cosurfactant

Polymerizable cosurfactants

Studies of Surfactant and Cosurfactant Exchanges

Surfactant cosurfactant

Surfactant cosurfactant system

Surfactants cosurfactants

© 2024 chempedia.info