Analytical detection system

In this presentation we will discuss analytical detection systems composed of enzyme and probe molecular components working in tandem, with the enzymes serving the role of the signal-generating mechanism linked to ligand-specific biomolecular probes. In general, we will draw a distinction between the enzyme and the probe components. 

Abstract. Electroanalytical methods are highly compatible with micro- and nano-machining technology and have the potential of invasive but non-destmctive cell analysis. In combination with optical probes and imaging techniques, electroanalytical methods show great potential for the development of multi-analyte detection systems to monitor in real-time cellular dynamics. 

L. Ogren, Enzyme Reactors in Analytical Detection Systems. Theory and Applications. Univ. of Lund, Sweden (1981). (Ph.D. Thesis). 

Laser ablation ICP-MS is used for direct analysis of the elemental and isotopic composition of solid samples. Photons from the laser system are focused into a high peak power energy pulse that interacts with the sample. As a result of this interaction, small particles, atoms and ions are removed from the topmost atomic layers forming a laser-induced aerosol above the sample surface. The aerosol is then transported by an inert gas stream to the ICP-MS. After vaporization, atomization and ionization of the particles in the ICP, quadrupole, magnetic sector field or time-of-flight mass filters are used for mass separation. Because of the properties of the laser systems available today, bulk analysis with low spatial resolution (>100 p-m) as well as local analysis with high spatial resolution (<20 p.m) are possible. Since only small sample amounts are ablated per laser shot, a high sensitivity analytical detection system is a prerequisite for trace and ultratrace analysis. 

As femtomolar detection of analytes become more routine, the goal is to achieve attomolar (10 molar) analyte detection, corresponding to the detection of thousands of molecules. Detection sensitivity is enhanced if the noise ia the analytical system can be reduced. System noise consists of two types, extrinsic and intrinsic. Intrinsic aoise, which represents a fundamental limitation linked to the probabiHty of finding the analyte species within the excitation and observation regions of the iastmment, cannot be eliminated. However, extrinsic aoise, which stems from light scatteriag and/or transient electronic sources, can be alleviated. 

Electrodriven separation techniques are destined to be included in many future multidimensional systems, as CE is increasingly accepted in the analytical laboratory. The combination of LC and CE should become easier as vendors work towards providing enhanced microscale pumps, injectors, and detectors (18). Detection is often a problem in capillary techniques due to the short path length that is inherent in the capillary. The work by Jorgenson s group mainly involved fluorescence detection to overcome this limit in the sensitivity of detection, although UV-VIS would be less restrictive in the types of analytes detected. Increasingly sensitive detectors of many types will make the use of all kinds of capillary electrophoretic techniques more popular. 

The dimensions of the exit tube from the detector are not critical for analytical separations but they can be for preparative chromatography if fractions are to be collected for subsequent tests or examination. The dispersion that occurs in the detector exit tube is more difficult to measure. Another sample valve can be connected to the detector exit and the mobile phase passed backwards through the detecting system. The same experiment is performed, the same measurements made and the same calculations carried out. The dispersion that occurs in the exit tube is normally considerably greater than that between the column and the detector. However, providing the dispersion is known, the preparative separation can be adjusted to accommodate the exit tube dispersion and allow an accurate collection of each solute band. 

Definition and Uses of Standards. In the context of this paper, the term "standard" denotes a well-characterized material for which a physical parameter or concentration of chemical constituent has been determined with a known precision and accuracy. These standards can be used to check or determine (a) instrumental parameters such as wavelength accuracy, detection-system spectral responsivity, and stability (b) the instrument response to specific fluorescent species and (c) the accuracy of measurements made by specific Instruments or measurement procedures (assess whether the analytical measurement process is in statistical control and whether it exhibits bias). Once the luminescence instrumentation has been calibrated, it can be used to measure the luminescence characteristics of chemical systems, including corrected excitation and emission spectra, quantum yields, decay times, emission anisotropies, energy transfer, and, with appropriate standards, the concentrations of chemical constituents in complex S2unples. 

All previous discussion has focused on sample preparation, i.e., removal of the targeted analyte(s) from the sample matrix, isolation of the analyte(s) from other co-extracted, undesirable sample components, and transfer of the analytes into a solvent suitable for final analysis. Over the years, numerous types of analytical instruments have been employed for this final analysis step as noted in the preceding text and Tables 3 and 4. Overall, GC and LC are the most often used analytical techniques, and modern GC and LC instrumentation coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection systems are currently the analytical techniques of choice. Methods relying on spectrophotometric detection and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) are now rarely employed, except perhaps for qualitative purposes. 

GC was used to analyze the sample extracts. Three detection systems were used, two for quantitation and one for analyte confirmation. 

It is often difficult to define where sample extraction ends and cleanup procedures begin. Sample extracts may be injected directly into a gas or liquid chromatograph in certain cases, but this will be dependent on the analyte, sample matrix, injection, separation and detection system, and the limit of determination (LOD) which is required. It is also more likely that matrix-matched calibration standards will be needed in order to obtain robust quantitative data if no cleanup steps are employed. 

The principal limitation in the use of electrophoretic techniques is the lack of availability of suitable detection systems for quantitative analysis and unequivocal identification of pesticide analytes. Traditionally, either ultraviolet/visible (UVA IS) or fluorescence detection techniques have been used. However, as with chromatographic techniques, MS should be the detection system of choice. A brief comparison of the numbers of recent papers on the application of GC/MS and LC/MS with capillary elec-trophoresis/mass spectrometery (CE/MS) demonstrates that interfaces between CE... 

Finally, the integration of biochemical or biosensor methods with conventional chromatographic analyses should not be overlooked. For example, the use of im-munoaffinity columns prior to chemiluminescence or the use of biosensor detection systems following the chromatographic step may provide useful solutions to speciflc analytical needs. 

The internal standard and analyte should be resolved chromatograph-ically to baseline (except for isotoplcally labelled samples when mass discrimination or radioactive counting are used for detection), elute close together, respond to the detection system in a similar way, and be present in nearly equal concentrations. 

Separations in liquid chromatography occur in a dynamic manner and, therefore, require detection systems which work online and produce an Instantaneous record of the column events. A prototypic detector must have good sensitivity to deal with low concentrations of analytes typical of analytical liquid... 

In LIF detection systems, excitation power may be increased up to six orders of magnitude compared to CF detection. Most LC-LIF detection concerns under-ivatised polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and fluorescing dyes (e.g. polymethines). Because only a limited number of analytes possess native fluorescence, derivatisation of the analyte before detection is normally required in trace analysis of organic solutes by means of LIF detection. LIF detection in HPLC was reviewed... 

---