Three Mile Island nuclear reactor

The accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor in March 1979 resulted in contamination of the containment and auxiliary buildings. An aerosol sample from the auxiliary building obtained by filtering about 1,4xl09 cm3 of air through a fiber glass filter for 8 days contained an estimated total transuranic actinide radioactivity of 13 Bq (350 pCi), of which 241 Am was the major contributor (Kanapilly et al. 

A (a) The Three Mile Island nuclear reactor, site of a small nuclear accident in 1979. Oj) The Chernobyl nuclear reactor, site of a major nuclear accident in 1986. (c) Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan before the nuclear accident in 2011. 

On March 28, 1979, a loss of containment incident occurred at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. An overheated reactor released radioactive steam and water to the atmosphere resulting in a mass evacuation of the surrounding community. Although no direct injuries were attributed to the incident, environmental effects were later observed and public outcry resulted in a slowdown in the growth of the nuclear power industry. 

By the 1970s, nuclear power was in widespread use, in the U S. and abroad, as a source of electricity. As of 2007, nuclear power provided about 19.3% of the electricity generated in the U.S., created by 104 licensed nuclear reactors. Nonetheless, the potential for accidents, meltdowns and other disasters has never been far from the minds of many consumers (after all, for many of us the first image that comes to mind upon hearing the word nuclear is a nuclear bomb). The 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear power plant accident in the U.S. led to the cancellation of scores of nuclear projects across the nation. This trend was later reinforced by the disaster at... 

At the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania on March 28, 1979. a hose contributed to the front-page event. In short, a nuclear reactor overheated, a small amount of radioactivity escaped, and the public confidence about the safety of nuclear power was shattered. It is believed by the technical community that no one was likely to be harmed by this release, but it led to a slowdown in the growth of nuclear power in the United States. [9]... 

The gas that you see coming from the towers of the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania is all water vapor. Few chemical pollutants are released during the normal operation of a nuclear plant. Both equipment failure and human error resulted in overheating of the reaction chamber and a partial meltdown of fuel rods at this power plant in 1979. As a result, the building surrounding the reactor became flooded with water contaminated with radioactive material, and radioactive gas was released into the atmosphere. ... 

The partial meltdown of the reactor core at Three Mile Island nuclear power plant was mainly due to human error (Heppenheimer, 2002). On March 28, 1979, maintenance workers were cleaning sludge from a small pipe when they inadvertently blocked the flow of cooling water. Heat in the core flashed some water into steam and the resulting pressure surge popped a relief valve. Emergency pumps started up to restore water flow, but two valves to the reactor core had been left closed. The water poured, instead, out of the relief valve. Unaware of the open valve, and... 

As a result of the analysis of events during the accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant (TMI, March 1979), the importance of human error in nuclear plants was better understood. The accident resulted from the confusion of the control room operators with inadequate instrumentation and inaccurate procedures. The most important factor was that they had to act in spite of the weaknesses in the training to respond to unexpected events. Therefore, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) called for the improvement of Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) and in nuclear reactor operator training. The philosophy of incident response implemented in the improved procedures was to take a symptom-based approach (operators foUow a series of yes - no questions to ensure that the reactor core remains covered and only then determine what was the cause of the problem) (USNRC, 2009). 

Many see the commercial nuclear power station as a hazard to human life and the environment. Part of this is related to the atomic-weapon heritage of the nuclear reactor, and part is related to the reactor accidents that occurred at the Three Mile Island nuclear power station near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, in 1979, and Chernobyl nuclear power station near Kiev in the Ukraine in 1986. The accident at Chernobyl involved Unit-4, a reactor that was a light water cooled, graphite moderated reactor built without a containment vessel. The accident resulted in 56 deaths that have been directly attributed to it, and the potential for increased cancer deaths from those exposed to the radioactive plume that emanated from the reactor site at the time of the accident. Since the accident, the remaining three reactors at the station have been shut down, the last one in 2000. The accident at Three Mile Island... 

A clear example is the commercial nuclear power industry in the United States. In the 1960s and early 1970s, nuclear power looked like a very promising career and an incredible growth industry. Nuclear power was to be our cheap form of energy. But the industry was stymied by the American public s perception that nuclear power is an unwarranted risk. And the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear accident sealed its fate. Now commercial nuclear power in the United States is a relatively small industry in comparison to other forms of generating power. And yet, in France, 40% of the electric power is generated by nuclear reactors. 

Nuclear power has achieved an excellent safety record. Exceptions are the accidents at Three Mile Island in 1979 and at Chernobyl in 1986. In the United States, safety can be attributed in part to the strict regulation provided by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which reviews proposed reactor designs, processes appHcations forUcenses to constmct and operate plants, and provides surveillance of all safety-related activities of a utiUty. The utiUties seek continued improvement in capabiUty, use procedures extensively, and analy2e any plant incidents for their root causes. Similar programs intended to ensure reactor safety are in place in other countries. 

The accident at the Three Mile Island (TMI) plant in Pennsylvania in 1979 led to many safety and environmental improvements (4—6). No harm from radiation resulted to TMI workers, to the pubHc, or to the environment (7,8), although the accident caused the loss of a 2 x 10 investment. The accident at the Chernobyl plant in the Ukraine in 1986, on the other hand, caused the deaths of 31 workers from high doses of radiation, increased the chance of cancer later in life for thousands of people, and led to radioactive contamination of large areas. This latter accident was unique to Soviet-sponsored nuclear power. The Soviet-designed Chemobyl-type reactors did not have the intrinsic protection against a mnaway power excursion that is requited in the test of the world, not was there a containment building (9—11). 

The past safety record of nuclear reactors, other than the Soviet Chernobyl-type RBMK reactors, is excellent Excluding RBMK reactors, there had been about 9000 reactor-years of operation in the world by the end of 1999, including about 2450 in the United States.1 In this time there was only one accident involving damage to the reactor core, the 1979 Three Mile Island accident, and even at TMI there was very little release of radionuclides to the outside environment. 

Three Mile Island and Chernobyl occurred more than 20 years ago and the nuclear power freeze is beginning to thaw. High priced oil and natural gas make atomic energy appear cheap by comparison. Global-warming concerns are pushing a new interest in nuclear power. After a decade where no nuclear power plants came online in the United States, 31 new reactors are planned. 

Conventional nuclear reactors and advanced breeder reactors were America s primary energy strategy since the 1950s to resolve the fossil fuel problem but when a reactor accident occurred in 1979 at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, public and investor confidence in nuclear fission dropped. The accident was triggered by the failure of a feedwater pump that supplied water to the steam generators. The backup feedwater pumps were not connected to the system as required, which caused the reactor to heat up. The safety valve then failed to act which allowed a radioactive water and gas leak. This was the worst nuclear power accident in the U.S., but in this accident no one was killed and no one was directly injured. At Three Mile Island faulty instrumentation gave incorrect readings for the... 

Highly publicized nuclear accidents such as those that occurred at Chernobyl and Three Mile Island must be considered anomalies. Nuclear power plants have multiple safety measures in place to prevent radiation leaks. The small amount of radioactive waste produced by nuclear reactors is controlled and usually contained in the plant facility. 

Two accidents of vastly differing severity have occurred at nuclear power plants. On 28 March 1979, an accident occurred in the nuclear power plant at Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania, USA. The radiation was contained and the small amount released had negligible effects on the health of individuals at the plant. On 26 April 1986 an accident occurred in the nuclear power plant 10 miles from the city of Chernobyl, then part of the Soviet Union. The chain reaction in the radioactive core of one of the four reactors became uncontrolled. Steam pressure rose to dangerous levels there were several explosions and a subsequent fire took several hours to extinguish. Large amounts of radioactive material were scattered over a wide area and into the atmosphere (later descending in a dilute form in rain all over the world). 

The process at Three Mile Island involved nuclear fission and subsequent reactor cooling using circulating water. The primary water was kept under pressure to prevent boiling. Heat was transferred to a secondary water system that supplied power to a steam generator. Upon completion of this step, steam condensate was recovered and recycled. All radioactive materials, including primary water, were enclosed in a lined concrete containment building to prevent their escape to the atmosphere. 

The hardest part of engineering risk assessment has turned out to be the prediction of the modes of failure. Serious accidents at nuclear installations, such as those at Three Mile Island or at Chernobyl, have been caused by modes of failure that had not been analysed at all. For example, the report of the Presidents Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island (Presidents Commission, 1979, p9) highlighted that the concentration of the assessment process on more obvious large break scenarios meant that the eventual mode of failure, which was a result of a chain of a number of more minor events, was not even considered. Despite the use of significant resources in the design process, the risk assessment had been unable to characterize the complex system adequately, a system that was totally human-made and defined. In particular, the risk assessment process had not been able to identify modes of failure caused by humans involved in the operations of the reactor behaving in unexpected ways. 

---