Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Swain, A. D., and H. E. Guttmann (1983). Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis With Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications. NUREG/ CR-1278. Washington, DC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. [Pg.145]

USNRC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission... [Pg.291]

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission United States Public Health Services Utility Workers Union of America... [Pg.47]

USNRC. 1969. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Interpretations. Code of Federal Regulations. 10 CFR 8. [Pg.390]

USNRC. 1993f. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Annual limits on intake (ALIs) and derived air concentrations (DACs) of radionuclides for occupational exposure effluent concentrations concentrations for release to sewerage. Code of Federal Regulations. 10 CFR 20, Appendix B. [Pg.391]

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (unknown year) Use of Contact Lenses with Respirators, HPPOS-162 PDR-9111220148, United States Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. Available at http /www,nrc.gov/what-we-do/radiation/hppos/hpposl62.html (accessed September 2006). [Pg.610]

The Lyphocheck urine has been optimized such that the drug concentrations lie above the recommended cut-offs for screening determinations recommended by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (formerly the National Institute of Drug Abuse, NIDA) and the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This standard urine is prepared from human urine to which no preservative is added and is lyophilized to improve its stability. [Pg.223]

USNRC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission WANO World Association of Nuclear Operators... [Pg.34]

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, Sealed Source and Device Registry, http-J/www.hsrd.oml.gov/nrc/sources/index.cpn. [Pg.55]

II-5] UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, Health Effects Models for Nuclear Power Plant Accidents Consequence Analysis, Rep. NUREG/CR-4214, USNRC, Washington, DC (1989). [Pg.60]

I have provided a list of references at the end of each chapter, however a complete chapter Additional references) is almost completely devoted to a list of some institutional references (i.e. those published by the IAEA, by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) which is one of the richest sources of publications among Regulatory Bodies). These additional references are labelled with the superscript AR. Many of these references can be consulted and even downloaded from the web sites listed in the Web sites chapter (see p. 425). [Pg.445]

ABSTRACT The analysis of events during the accident at Three Mile Island concluded that the accident was due to confused control room operators with inadequate instrumentation and inaccurate procedures. Therefore, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) called for improved nuclear reactor operator training and Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs). [Pg.350]

As a result of the analysis of events during the accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant (TMI, March 1979), the importance of human error in nuclear plants was better understood. The accident resulted from the confusion of the control room operators with inadequate instrumentation and inaccurate procedures. The most important factor was that they had to act in spite of the weaknesses in the training to respond to unexpected events. Therefore, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) called for the improvement of Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) and in nuclear reactor operator training. The philosophy of incident response implemented in the improved procedures was to take a symptom-based approach (operators foUow a series of yes - no questions to ensure that the reactor core remains covered and only then determine what was the cause of the problem) (USNRC, 2009). [Pg.350]

Examples of comprehensive procedures to qualify piping systems are the European safety practices on the application of the leak before break concept (EUR 18549), the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission s leak before break appUcation (SRP 3.6.3.), the break preclusion procedure used in Germany (RSK guidelines) or the leak before break guideline used in Japan (JEAG 4613). [Pg.28]


See other pages where United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission is mentioned: [Pg.556]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.972]    [Pg.345]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.972 , Pg.975 ]




SEARCH



Nuclear Regulatory

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

United States Nuclear Regulatory

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission USNRC)

© 2024 chempedia.info