Systemic interactions

Owing to their charge, cationic polymers can induce opsonization-mediated aggregation and disassembly of polyplexes in body fluids. Recent in vitro studies have shown PEI-DNA and PLL-DNA polyplexes associate with serum proteins such as albumin, IgM, fibronectin and complement C3, although these unwanted interactions can be negated through modification with hydrophilic polymers. Increase in size in the polyplex systems due to aggregation in systemic circulation could lead to capillaiy bed capture in the 

Opsonization-induced polyplex disassembly during systemic circulation also represents a barrier to efficient cellular targeting. The instability of electrostatic polyelectrolyte assemblies means polyplexes are susceptible to polyanion displacement after cellular or chemical interaction, such as with erythrocytes or heparin, respectively. Increased levels of free polycations in the blood, and in particular high MW and nondegradable polymers, could induce adverse effects if excreted or broken down. However, there are numerous reports where surface modification of the polyplex with hydrophilic polymers leads to steric stability with reduction in disassembly during systemic circulation.  

Gao et investigated the biodistribution of intravenously administered chitosan (MW 160 kDa, 80% deacetylation) and PEI-based siRNA polyplexes in mice. They performed Northern blot analysis 30 min after administration and showed that siRNA distributed evenly in the liver, kidney, spleen, lung and heart when used with commercial Jet-PEI transfection reagent. The chitosan-based polyplexes accumulated predominately in the kidney, and were still present 24 h after administration. The renal accumulation of 

Passive accumulation and physiological effects have been exploited for disease treatment in preclinical models for inflammation and cancer ° without surface modification or active targeting by ligand attachment. This may reflect the neovasculature associated with these conditions and the enhanced permeability and retention effect in tumors in which nanoscale particles migrate and accumulate across leaky vasculature in disease tissue. Relying on physiological conditions, however, limits the capability to control the location and dose and results in widespread biodistrihution commonly associated with unmodified nanoparticles that 

---

Table 3.4.4-2 Example Format for an Auxiliary Feedwater System Interaction FMEA ...

The event" list, across the top of the event tree, specifies events for which the probability of failure (or success) must be specified to obtain the branching probabilities of the event tree. Events that are the failure of a complex system may require fault tree or equivalent methods to calculate the branching probability using component probabilities. In some cases, the branching probability may be obtained directly from failure rate data suitably conditioned for applicability, environment and system interactions. 

Modeling of most component and system interactions and dependencies is explicit. 

This method, developed under USNRC sponsorship, was demonstrated in the analysis of system interactions in the Watts Bar plant (Sacks et al., 1983), Indian Point 3 (Alesso, 1984). It had... 

System models assume the independent probabilities of basic event failures. Violators oithis assumed independence are called Systems Interactions, Dependencies, Common Modes, or Common Cause Failure (CCF) which is used here. CCF may cause deterministic, possibly delayed, failures of equipment, an increase in the random failure probability of affected equipment. The CCF may immediately affect redundant equipment with devastating effect because no lime is available for mitigation. If the effect of CCF is a delayed increase in the random failure probability and known, time is available for mitigation. 

Sandia Systems Interaction Study (NUREG/CR-I32I) SETS... 

List of the possible misdiagnoses and subsequent operator actions under consideration which could give rise to system interactions from operator diagnostic errors,... 

List of the misdiagnoses which do not cause, system interaction, and... 

It is unclear whether previously published fire risk analyses have adequately ircaicd dependent failures and systems interaetions. Examples of either experienced or postulated system interactions that have been missed include unrelated systems that share common locations and the attendant spatially related physical interactions arising from fire. Incomplete enumeration of causes of failure and cavalier assumptions of independence can lead to underestimation of accident l rci uencies by many orders of magnitude,... 

A transient, is a passing event which may upset the reactor operation but does not physically damage the primary cooling envelope. Table 6.1-1 lists PWR transient initiating events that ha c been used in PRA preparation. Typical frontline systems that mitigate LOCAs and transients for a PWR are presented in Table 6.1-2. The frontline systems must be supported by support systems interactions between both are presented in Table 6.1 -3 for ANO-1 (Arkansas Nuclear Unit 1). 

BFR - Binomial Failure Rate (model of common cause system interactions). 

Boyd, G.J., et al., Final Report Phase 1 Systems Interaction Methodology Applications Program, April 1980... 

Lin, J.J. et al., Systems Interaction State-of-the-Art Review and Methods I luation, January 1981. 

Alesso, H. P., 1982 Review of PASNY Systems Interaction Study, LLNL, UCID 19130, April. 

Sacks, 1. J. et al., 1983, Systems Interaction Results from the Digraph Matrix Analysis of the Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant High Pressure Safety Injection Systems, LLNL UCRI..-53467, December. 

Diffuser jet interaction is a common case when air is supplied into ventilated rooms through multiple air diffusers (e.g., sidewall-mounted grills or ceiling-mounted air diffusers) or using speciality air distribution systems. Interacting jets can be supplied... 

STUDY FINAL DETAILS OF JOINTS, CUTOUTS, STIFFENERS, AND SYSTEM INTERACTIONS IN A SOPHISTICATED MODEL... 

Survey and Evaluation of System Interaction Events and Sources Nuclear 4(X) occurrences of snubber failure at U.S. nuclear power plants from event reports Hydraulic and mechanical snubbers 103. 

Survey and Evaluation of System Interaction Events and Sources... 

System interaction Failure in one system that propagates to another. 

How does the system interact widi die enviromiient (e.g., hazardous waste streams, to.xic releases, etc.)... 

How does the system interact with other systems within the plant ... 

Both of the above approaches rely in most cases on classical ideas that picture the atoms and molecules in the system interacting via ordinary electrical and steric forces. These interactions between the species are expressed in terms of force fields, i.e., sets of mathematical equations that describe the attractions and repulsions between the atomic charges, the forces needed to stretch or compress the chemical bonds, repulsions between the atoms due to then-excluded volumes, etc. A variety of different force fields have been developed by different workers to represent the forces present in chemical systems, and although these differ in their details, they generally tend to include the same aspects of the molecular interactions. Some are directed more specifically at the forces important for, say, protein structure, while others focus more on features important in liquids. With time more and more sophisticated force fields are continually being introduced to include additional aspects of the interatomic interactions, e.g., polarizations of the atomic charge clouds and more subtle effects associated with quantum chemical effects. Naturally, inclusion of these additional features requires greater computational effort, so that a compromise between sophistication and practicality is required. 

All of the methods for designing laser pulses to achieve a desired control of a molecular dynamical process require the solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation for the system interacting with the radiation field. Normally, this equation must be solved many times within an iterative loop. Different possible approaches to the solution of these equations are discussed in Section V. 

A large number of cells are involved in the immune response and all are derived fiom the multipotential stem cells of the bone marrow. The predominant cell is the lymphocyte but monocytes-macrophages, endothelial cells, eosinophils and mast cells are also involved with certain immune responses. The two types of immunity (humoral and cell-mediated) are dependent on two distinct populations of lymphocytes, the B cells and the T cells respectively. Both the humoral and the cell-mediated systems interact to achieve an effective immune response. 

Second, a techno-managerial approach has been described to analyze how food and human systems interact and contribute to food quahty. It involves a systemahc and integrated use of theories from food technology sciences and management sciences, explicitly acknowledging dynamics and conditioning aspects of both the food and human systems. ... 

Information flow diagrams can be useful in understanding complex interactions (Franks, 1967). They help to identify missing relationships and provide a graphical aid to a full understanding of system interaction. An example of such a diagram is shown in Fig. 1.4. 

However, in the two-phase system described here the reaction progress has an influence on substrate transfer [Eq. (9)] and steady-state changes continually during the evolution of the system. Interaction between the reactant transfer and lipoxygenase-catalyzed reaction is therefore studied in octane-aqueous biphasic medium (modified Lewis cell). 

AVS - Advanced Visual Systems interactive data visualization software (http // www.avs.com)... 

Corasaniti MT, Bagetta G, Rotiroti D, Nistico G. The HIV envelope protein gpl20 in the nervous system interactions with nitric oxide, interleukin-1(3 and nerve growth factor signalling, with pathological implications in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol 1998 56(2) 153-156. 

In this chapter an overview of both the opportunities and the problems presented by the biological system for the use of polymeric drug delivery systems will be presented. Since the area of biocompatibility of the delivery system is a well-known constraint also imposed by the biological system and is beyond the scope of this presentation, this (important) consideration will be ignored here. In order to examine how a delivery system interacts with the biological system to... 

For further general reading in the area of drug delivery and biological systems interaction, the following texts and papers are recommended as a starting place. 

---