Standards and quantitation

The preparation of standards for the analysis of VOCs does present difficulties for many laboratories. Firstly, the common use of many solvents in laboratories means that contamination and high blanks are real problems. The analytical techniques used are highly sensitive, standard solutions are usually prepared in methanol, and therefore absorption of atmospheric contaminants readily occurs. Secondly, the volatile nature of the components may make quantitative transfer susceptible to losses. For these reasons, and because of the large number of components involved, many laboratories prefer to buy in solutions of standard mixtures, which are usually prepared gravimetrically under clean conditions. However, laboratories need to check the accuracy of such solutions, usually by comparison to solutions from other suppliers and by means of proficiency schemes, and take care to minimise evaporative losses over the time-scale of use. 

Care should be taken to monitor the manufacturer s uncertainty information in relation to the individual components. This can vary considerably, typically between 0.5% and 5% standard uncertainty. This information should influence the choice of manufacturer for calibration and quality control standards, with the lower uncertainty standards being used for calibration. 

---

In Laser Ionization Mass Spectrometry (LIMS, also LAMMA, LAMMS, and LIMA), a vacuum-compatible solid sample is irradiated with short pulses ("10 ns) of ultraviolet laser light. The laser pulse vaporizes a microvolume of material, and a fraction of the vaporized species are ionized and accelerated into a time-of-flight mass spectrometer which measures the signal intensity of the mass-separated ions. The instrument acquires a complete mass spectrum, typically covering the range 0— 250 atomic mass units (amu), with each laser pulse. A survey analysis of the material is performed in this way. The relative intensities of the signals can be converted to concentrations with the use of appropriate standards, and quantitative or semi-quantitative analyses are possible with the use of such standards. 

Moreover, the risk-doubling criterion given in the example of Mr. Z is by no means a universally accepted standard, and quantitative evaluations of this sort are often avoided altogether by some experts. 

Hair and finger or toe nails have been used for trace metal analyses. However, collection procedures have been poorly standardized, and quantitative measurements are better obtained on blood or urine. Hair specimens have also been analyzed for their drug content (see Chapter 34). 

Hence, it may be considered that the luminescent bacteria toxicity test may be used successfully for preliminary screening of toxic concentrations of potentially irritating compounds or products. The LBT is rapid, economical, standardized, and quantitative. It is a useful tool as part of a battery of in vitro tests used for the reduction or partial replacement of certain animal tests. 

Fortifying laboratory water samples approaches actually recovering field samples if a pesticide is completely dissolved and not associated with suspended matter and the other water quality characteristics are similar to natural water (pH, T, ionic strength). In another approach natural water characteristics are altered to laboratory fortification specification to obtain maximum efficiency and to be able to standardize extraction procedures. DiflEerent standardization procedures are needed for samples from diflEerent water environments—e.g., a river water with high turbidity, a clear stream, sea water, or organically polluted lake water. Many different water quality parameters (Table II) and solvents (Table I) are possible to standardize and quantitate LLE. The best choice should be defined for each water type. 

Bismuth standard solution (quantitative color test for Bi) dissolve 1 g of bismuth in a mixture of 3 mL of concentrated HNO3 and 2.8 mL of H2O and make up to 100 mL with glycerol. Also dissolve 5 g of KI in 5 mL of water and make up to 100 mL with glycerol. The two solutions are used together in the colorimetric estimation of Bi. 

A third spectrophotometric method for the quantitative determination of the concentration of in blood yields an Sjamp of 0.193 for a 1.00-mL sample of blood that has been diluted to 5.00 mb. A second 1.00-mL sample is spiked with 1.00 )J,L of a 1560-ppb Pb + standard and diluted to 5.00 mb, yielding an Sspike of 0.419. Determine the concentration of Pb + in the original sample of blood. 

Selecting and Standardizing a Titrant Most common acid-base titrants are not readily available as primary standards and must be standardized before they can be used in a quantitative analysis. Standardization is accomplished by titrating a known amount of an appropriate acidic or basic primary standard. 

Quantitative Analysis Using the Method of Standard Additions Because of the difficulty of maintaining a constant matrix for samples and standards, many quantitative potentiometric methods use the method of standard additions. A sample of volume, Vx) and analyte concentration, Cx, is transferred to a sample cell, and the potential, (ficell)x) measured. A standard addition is made by adding a small volume, Vs) of a standard containing a known concentration of analyte, Cs, to the sample, and the potential, (ficell)s) measured. Provided that Vs is significantly smaller than Vx, the change in sample matrix is ignored, and the analyte s activity coefficient remains constant. Example 11.7 shows how a one-point standard addition can be used to determine the concentration of an analyte. 

Quantitative Calculations Quantitative analyses are often easier to conduct with HPLC than GC because injections are made with a fixed-volume injection loop instead of a syringe. As a result, variations in the amount of injected sample are minimized, and quantitative measurements can be made using external standards and a normal calibration curve. 

Contaminant by-products depend upon process routes to the product, so maximum impurity specifications may vary, eg, for CHA produced by aniline hydrogenation versus that made by cyclohexanol amination. Capillary column chromatography has improved resolution and quantitation of contaminants beyond the more fliUy described packed column methods (61) used historically to define specification standards. Wet chemical titrimetry for water by Kad Eisher or amine number by acid titration have changed Httle except for thein automation. Colorimetric methods remain based on APHA standards. 

Standardization and Testing. RequHements for DTP have been described (17). Standardization of potency for the toxoids reHes on antigenic and flocculation tests. In principle, the antigenic tests are conducted to measure the abUity of the vacciae to Hiduce specific antibodies Hi guHiea pigs. The flocculation test provides a quantitative estimate of the amount of toxoid Hi the vacciae. 

Standardization and Testing". RequHemeats are geaerally specified within Hceases Hi the United States, and include a variety of Hi-process tests to assess purity, safety, and potency of the iadividual components and potency and safety of the final product. Potency is standardized by determining the size of the conjugate and the quantitative amount of saccharide that is bound to the carrier protein. General safety and immunogenicity is assessed Hi animals. 

Standardization and Testing. Potency is determiaed by quantitating the Hepatitis B antigen by an antibody-biading assay combiaed with a determination of the amount of proteia. Safety testing typical for cell culture-derived products is also performed, and iacludes assuting the absence of Hve vims. 

Standardization and Testing". The final vaccine is tested for safety, potency, and residual chemicals. Safety includes testing for endotoxin and stetihty. Potency is evaluated by quantitative determination of the amount of hemagglutinin in the vaccine. Antibody to this glycoprotein is associated with protection. The single radial immunodiffusion (SKID) technique is used to standardi2e the mass of this protein in comparison to a reference preparation. 

Asphaltenes seem to be relatively constant in composition in residual asphalts, despite the source, as deterrnined by elemental analysis (6). Deterrnination of asphaltenes is relatively standard, and the fractions are termed / -pentane, / -hexane, / -heptane, or naphtha-insoluble, depending upon the precipitant used (5,6,49). After the asphaltenes are removed, resinous fractions are removed from the maltenes-petrolenes usually by adsorption on activated gels or clays. Recovery of the resin fraction by desorbtion is usually nearly quantitative. 

Oxides (Ln Oj), fluorides (LnF ), sulfides (Ln S, LnS), sulfofluorides (LnSF) of lanthanides are bases of different functional materials. Analytical control of such materials must include non-destructive methods for the identification of compound s chemical forms and quantitative detenuination methods which does not require analytical standards. The main difficulties of this analysis by chemical methods are that it is necessary to transform weakly soluble samples in solution. 

The method was validated in accordance to the guidelines of the international conference on harmonization (ICH). Data with respect to accuracy, within- and between run precision, recovery, detection and quantitation limits were reported and found to be within the accepted international criteria. Neither endogeneous substances nor the commonly used dmgs were found to interfere with the retention times of the analytes. Standard solutions of the dmg and quality control preparations at high and low level concentrations were demonstrated to be stable at room temperature and/or -20°C for long and short periods of time. 

GDMS is slowly replacing SSMS because of its increased quantitative accuracy and improved detection limits. Like SNMS and SALI, GDMS is semiquantitative without standards ( a factor of 3) and quantitative with standards ( 20%) because sputtering and ionizadon are decoupled. GDMS is often used to measure impuri-des in metals and other materials which are eventually used to form thin films in other materials applications. 

NAA is a quantitative method. Quantification can be performed by comparison to standards or by computation from basic principles (parametric analysis). A certified reference material specifically for trace impurities in silicon is not currently available. Since neutron and y rays are penetrating radiations (free from absorption problems, such as those found in X-ray fluorescence), matrix matching between the sample and the comparator standard is not critical. Biological trace impurities standards (e.g., the National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Rference Material, SRM 1572 Citrus Leaves) can be used as reference materials. For the parametric analysis many instrumental fiictors, such as the neutron flux density and the efficiency of the detector, must be well known. The activation equation can be used to determine concentrations ... 

In the technological approach, qualitative and quantitative inforraatioii on emissions released by various production and work processes, as well as data on control technology performance, are required in order to specify the air quality target levels that are technically and economically feasible. The approach is based on information on current concentration levels that are achieved by different control technologies, ranging from standard practices to the most advanced technology options (Fig. 6.7). 

The satisfactory result shown in Table 12 suggests that one might give a more detailed and quantitative discussion of the variation with temperature. If we are to do this, we need some standard of comparison with which to compare the experimental results. Just as wq compare an imperfect gas with a perfect gas, and compare a non-ideal solution with an ideal solution, so we need a simple standard behavior with which to compare the observed behavior. We obtain this standard behavior if, supposing that. /e is almost entirely electrostatic in origin, we take J,np to vary with temperature as demanded by the macroscopic dielectric constant t of the medium 1 that is to say, we assume that Jen, as a function of temperature is inversely proportional to . For this standard electrostatic term we may use the notation, instead of... 

---