Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantitative transfer

To prepare the solution we measure out exactly 0.1500 g of Cu into a small beaker. To dissolve the Cu we add a small portion of concentrated HNO3 and gently heat until it completely dissolves. The resulting solution is poured into a 1-L volumetric flask. The beaker is rinsed repeatedly with small portions of water, which are added to the volumetric flask. This process, which is called a quantitative transfer, ensures that the Cu is completely transferred to the volumetric flask. Finally, additional water is added to the volumetric flask s calibration mark. [Pg.30]

Calculate the molar concentration of NaCl, to the correct number of significant figures, if 1.917 g of NaCl is placed in a beaker and dissolved in 50 mF of water measured with a graduated cylinder. This solution is quantitatively transferred to a 250-mF volumetric flask and diluted to volume. Calculate the concentration of this second solution to the correct number of significant figures. [Pg.34]

A standard solution of Mn + was prepared by dissolving 0.250 g of Mn in 10 ml of concentrated HNO3 (measured with a graduated cylinder). The resulting solution was quantitatively transferred to a 100-mL volumetric flask and diluted to volume with distilled water. A 10-mL aliquot of the solution was pipeted into a 500-mL volumetric flask and diluted to volume, (a) Express the concentration of Mn in parts per million, and estimate uncertainty by a propagation of uncertainty calculation, (b) Would the uncertainty in the solution s concentration be improved... [Pg.99]

Manipulations involving materials sensitive to air or water vapour can be carried out by these procedures. Vacuum-line methods make use of quantitative transfers, and P(pressure)-V(volume)-T(temperature) measurements, of gases, and trap-to-trap separations of volatile substances. [Pg.30]

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) are excellent alternatives to traditional extraction methods, with both being used independently for clean-up and/or analyte concentration prior to chromatographic analysis. While SFE has been demonstrated to be an excellent method for extracting organic compounds from solid matrices such as soil and food (36, 37), SPE has been mainly used for diluted liquid samples such as water, biological fluids and samples obtained after-liquid-liquid extraction on solid matrices (38, 39). The coupling of these two techniques (SPE-SFE) turns out to be an interesting method for the quantitative transfer... [Pg.139]

When columns of the same polarity are used, the elution order of components in GC are not changed and there is no need for trapping. However, when columns of different polarities are used trapping or heart-cutting must be employed. Trapping can be used in trace analysis for enrichment of samples by repetitive preseparation before the main separation is initiated and the total amount or part of a mixture can then be effectively and quantitatively transferred to a second column. The main considerations for a trap are that it should attain either very high or very low temperatures over a short period of time and be chemically inactive. The enrichment is usually carried out with a cold trap, plus an open vent after this, where the trace components are held within the trap and the excess carrier gas is vented. Then, in the re-injection mode the vent behind the trap is closed, the trap is heated and the trapped compounds can be rapidly flushed from the trap and introduced into the second column. Peak broadening and peak distortion, which could occur in the preseparation, are suppressed or eliminated by this re-injection procedure (18). [Pg.317]

In GC X GC, a sample is separated into a large number of small fractions and each of these is subsequently quantitatively transferred to a secondary column to be further separated. The second separation is very much faster than the first separation, so that the fractions can be narrow and the separation obtained on the first column can be maintained. The collection of the fractions from the first column is achieved by focusing, rather than by valve switching, and the entire sample reaches the detector. The consequence is a chromatogram, with a two-dimensional plane, rather than a one-dimensional axis, as the time domain. One dimension of this plane represents the retention time on the first column, while the second dimension represents the retention time on the second column. Every separated peak can be presented as a... [Pg.398]

In theory, increased quantities of the organic compound finely ground with constant quantities of potassium bromide should give infrared spectra of increasing intensity. However, good quantitative results by this direct procedure are difficult to obtain due to problems associated with the non-quantitative transfer of powder from the small ball-mill grinder (or pestle and mortar) into the compression die. These are only partially overcome by using a micrometer to measure the final disc thickness. [Pg.755]

It should be noted that the weighed amount of KBr/KSCN is constant and that although the problem of non-quantitative transfer of powder from the ball-mill grinder still exists it affects both the carrier and the organic compound equally. When the infrared spectra for the six discs have been obtained the calibration curve is prepared by plotting the ratio of the intensity of the selected... [Pg.755]

Quantitatively transfer this amount to a clean, dry 100-ml volumetric flask. Fill the flask to the mark with solvent. [Pg.26]

Inspect the culture tubes in the manifold to determine if there is water in the organic eluent for any sample. If a water layer is present, quantitatively transfer the organic phase into a clean culture tube using a small amount of additional solvent as necessary. Return the culture tube containing the organic extract to its proper location in the manifold rack. Remove the Cig and sodium sulfate mbes, and reinstall the silica tubes on the manifold. With the sample remaining in the culture tube, continue to apply vacuum to the manifold to remove excess solvent. When the solvent volume is < 1 mL, discontinue vacuum, and allow the sample to return to room temperature. Adjust the sample volume in the culture mbe to 1 mL with isooctane-ethyl acetate (9 1, v/v). Transfer the entire sample into an autosampler vial for GC/MS analysis. Sample extracts may be stored for up to 1 month in a refrigerator (< 10 °C) before analysis. [Pg.374]

Concentrate the acetonitrile extracts obtained above to dryness below 40 °C with the rotary evaporator. Dissolve the residues in 2 mL of acetone. Quantitatively transfer the acetone extracts to a culture tube with a Teflon screw-cap containing 250 xL of acetone-olive oil keeper (1 1, v/v). Evaporate the acetone on a heating block not exceeding 40 °C under a stream of air. Wrap the threads on the Teflon culture mbe with Teflon tape and add 2.0 mL of 50% (w/w) sodium hydroxide. Cap tightly and heat the Teflon culture tube at approximately 200 °C for 3 h. [Pg.1204]

Quantitatively transfer the hydrolysis reaction solution to a 50-mL glass culture tube with a screw-cap by rinsing witli 3x5 mL of deionized water followed by 5 mL of 30% (v/v) sulfuric acid and one additional 5 mL of deionized water. Rinse the Teflon culture tube with acetone and transfer to the glass culture tube. Extract the acidic aqueous phase (pH 1) with 3 x 2.5 mL of toluene. Pass each upper toluene phase through approximately 3 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate contained in a 6-mL disposable filtration cartridge into a 10-mL volumetric flask. Adjust the volume of the solution to 10 mL with toluene. Condition a 3-mL diolsilane bonded silica gel SPE cartridge with two column volumes of toluene. Load a 5-mL aliquot of toluene solution and collect the eluate in a 125-mL round-bottom flask. Elute the column with an additional 50 mL of toluene (use the 75-mL reservoirs) and collect the eluate in the same round-bottom flask. Concentrate the toluene extract to approximately 3.0 mL at 40 °C under weak reduced pressure with a rotary evaporator. [Pg.1204]

HPnspot sizes are about l.fl mm, this corresponds to a sample volume of 100 to 200 nl. Pot conventional TLC plates sample volumes 5 to 10-fold greater an- /f acceptable. The sample solvent must be a good solvent for tlw sample to promote quantitative transfer from the saapl application device to the layer. Also, it must be of low viscosity, and sufficiently volatile to be easily evaporated from the plate. Further, it must wet the sorbent layer adequately otherwiaa ... [Pg.361]

Screening groups have experimented with several different solvent systems for manipulating and storing compounds. Solubilization of compounds in an organic solvent converts dry powders, oils and gums into liquids with more uniform properties that can be more readily and quantitatively transferred from container to container in massively parallel fashion with automated precision pipettors. Once... [Pg.49]

Discrimination-free quantitative transfer of products (up to C12o)... [Pg.191]

A recent extension of the scope of SPE-GC and SPE-GC-MS concerns the use of AED detection with its multielement detection capability and unusually high selectivity. Hankemeier [67] has described on-line SPE-GC-AED with an on-column interface to transfer 100 iL of desorbing solvent to the GC. The fully on-line set-up is characterised by detection limits of 5-20 ngL because of quantitative transfer of the analytes from the SPE to the GC module. On-line coupling of SPE with GC is more delicate than SPE-LC, because of the inherent incompatibility between the aqueous part of the SPE step and the dry part of the GC system. [Pg.437]

Suitability for trace analysis (quantitative transfer of solutes between extractor and chromatograph)... [Pg.440]

Trace analysis is particularly attractive for SFE-HPLC since quantitative transfer of all analytes extracted to the chromatographic system becomes possible. At present, on-line SFE-HPLC appears to be feasible for qualitative analysis only quantitation is difficult due to possible pump and detector precision problems. Sample size restrictions also appear to be another significant barrier to using on-line SFE-HPLC for quantitative analysis of real samples. On-line SFE-HPLC has therefore not proven to be a very popular hyphenated sample preparatory/separation technique. Although online SFE-HPLC has not been quantitatively feasible, SFE is quite useful for quantitative determination of those analytes that must be analysed by off-line HPLC, and should not be ruled out when considering sample preparatory techniques. In most cases, all of the disadvantages mentioned with the on-line technique (Table 7.15) are eliminated. On- and off-line SFE-HPLC were reviewed [24,128]. [Pg.445]

Flow limitations restrict application of the DFI interface for pSFC-MS coupling. pSFC-DFI-MS with electron-capture negative ionisation (ECNI) has been reported [421], The flow-rate of eluent associated with pSFC (either analytical scale - 4.6 mm i.d. - or microbore scale 1-2 mm, i.d.) renders this technique more compatible with other LC-MS interfaces, notably TSP and PB. There are few reports on workable pSFC-TSP-MS couplings that have solved real analytical problems. Two interfaces have been used for pSFC-EI-MS the moving-belt (MB) [422] and particle-beam (PB) interfaces [408]. pSFC-MB-MS suffers from mechanical complexity of the interface decomposition of thermally labile analytes problems with quantitative transfer of nonvolatile analytes and poor sensitivity (low ng range). The PB interface is mechanically simpler but requires complex optimisation and poor mass transfer to the ion source results in a limited sensitivity. Table 7.39 lists the main characteristics of pSFC-PB-MS. Jedrzejewski... [Pg.482]

Principles and Characteristics Multidimensional gas chromatography (MDGC) is widely used, due to the mobile-phase compatibility between the primary and secondary separating systems, which allows relatively simple coupling with less-complicated interfaces. In its simplest form, 2DGC can be carried out in the off-line mode. The most elementary procedure involves manual collection of effluent from a column, followed by reinjection into another column of a different selectivity (e.g. from an apolar to a polar column). Selecting proper GC-column combinations is critical. In on-line mode, the interface in MDGC must provide for the quantitative transfer of the effluent from one column... [Pg.548]


See other pages where Quantitative transfer is mentioned: [Pg.30]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.777]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.809]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.1156]    [Pg.1156]    [Pg.1157]    [Pg.1157]    [Pg.1205]    [Pg.1236]    [Pg.1297]    [Pg.1298]    [Pg.1298]    [Pg.910]    [Pg.994]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.553]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.30 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 ]




SEARCH



C Quantitation of the Transferred Product and Diffusion

E Quantitative Transfer of Liquids

Quantitative Treatment of Resistance to Mass Transfer Dispersion

Quantitative transfer of liquids

© 2024 chempedia.info