Standards, quantitation

The fermentation-derived food-grade product is sold in 50, 80, and 88% concentrations the other grades are available in 50 and 88% concentrations. The food-grade product meets the Vood Chemicals Codex III and the pharmaceutical grade meets the FCC and the United States Pharmacopoeia XK specifications (7). Other lactic acid derivatives such as salts and esters are also available in weU-estabhshed product specifications. Standard analytical methods such as titration and Hquid chromatography can be used to determine lactic acid, and other gravimetric and specific tests are used to detect impurities for the product specifications. A standard titration method neutralizes the acid with sodium hydroxide and then back-titrates the acid. An older standard quantitative method for determination of lactic acid was based on oxidation by potassium permanganate to acetaldehyde, which is absorbed in sodium bisulfite and titrated iodometricaHy. 

Yes, semiquantitative without standards quantitative with standards. Not a trace element method. 

The authors studied the reduction of C02 at lead and mercury cathodes in DMF and monitored the distribution of products as a function of current, C02 concentration, water concentration and changing the solvent to DMSO. The product analysis was performed using standard quantitative analysis on the electrolyte and the gas phase above. 

Vani K, Sompuram SR, Fitzgibbons P, et al. National HER2 proficiency test results using standardized quantitative controls. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2008 132 211-216. 

In order to measure the exact amount of a specific protein (analyte) by IHC signal intensity, a critical requirement is the availability of a standard reference material (present in a known amount by weight) that can be used to calibrate the assay (IHC stain). It is then possible to determine the amount of test analyte (protein) by a translation process from the intensity of IHC signals. In this respect it is helpful to consider the IHC stain as a tissue based ELISA assay (Enzyme Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay), noting that ELISA is used in the clinical laboratory as a standard quantitative method for measuring protein by weight in fluids, by reference to a calibrating reference standard. 

Calibration and standardization. Quantitative data are obtained by comparison with dose-response curves obtained using standard preparations of host-derived protein antigens. Since these preparations are mixtures of poorly defined proteins, a standard preparation is prepared and calibrated by a suitable protein determination method. This preparation is stored in a stable state suitable for use over an extended period of time. 

Quantitation by Internal Standard. Quantitation by internal standard provides the highest precision because uncertainties introduced by sample injection are avoided. In this quantitation technique, a known quantity of internal standard is introduced into each sample and standard solutions. As in the external standard quantitation, chromatograms of the standard and sample solutions are integrated to determine peak heights or peak areas. The ratio of the peak height or area of the analyte to an internal standard is determined. The ratios of the standards... 

Precision. The ability of the injector to draw the same amount of sample in replicate injections is crucial to the precision and accuracy for peak-area or peak-height comparison for external standard quantitation [10,11]. If the variability of the sample and standard being injected into the column is not controlled tightly, the basic principle of external standard quantitation is seriously compromised. No meaningful comparison between the responses of the sample and the standard can be made. The absolute accuracy of the injection volume is not critical as long as the same amount of standard and sample is injected. 

Guo et al. [24, 25] analyzed these in positive-ion mode APPI with transitions m/z 271—>-213 for DHEA and 273—>213 for the dideutero internal standard. Quantitative data from these studies are reported by Holst et al. [30]. 

SEPARATION AND QUANTIFICATION. Separation and quantification of components in mixtures extracted from real samples is accomplished by using standard quantitative GC procedures. 

Too often, the analyst omits a very important step in method development. A standard should be selected which will assure that the desired separation is reproducible on a day-to-day, month-to-month basis. The internal standard (quantitative) discussed above is not satisfactory for this purpose because it is not one of the compounds that is a "potential" compound to be resolved. Consider, if you will, a situation wherein a method has been developed which will resolve a drug from a given metabolite. This metabolite is a product indicative of some toxic reaction within the body. Let us assume that the drug produces this reaction and, hence, the metabolite occurs only rarely in some people. Obviously, the internal standard (quantitative) must be resolved from the drug and the metabolite. However, because the toxic reaction occurs rarely, in most analyses, the metabolite will not be present. Could the analyst assume that because the retention volumes of the internal standard (quantitative), and the drug Standard, are about the same as they were the last time the analysis was done, that the metabolite would still be resolved, if present The answer is apparent The analyst must include a metabolite "standard" to reaffirm selectivity and sensitivity. 

Analytical methods employed in soil chemistry include the standard quantitative methods for the analysis of gases, solutions, and solids, including colorimetric, titrimetric, gravimetric, and instrumental methods. The flame emission spectrophotometric method is widely employed for potassium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium barium, copper and other elements are determined in cation exchange studies. Occasionally arc and spark spectrographic methods are employed. 

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), on the other hand, has several advantages it can be used to analyze small numbers of tumor cells, DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue can be used, and it can be automated and standardized. Quantitative PCR techniques are currently being assessed for their clinical application to HF.R-2 DNA testing (Vona et al., 1999). However, presently the PCR technology is not optimally suited for routine, clinical application (see next section for details of quantitative analysis of HER-2Ineu expression). 

Reaction monitoring is usually beneficial. Even for well-established syntheses, the progress of organic reactions is often monitored qualitatively by chromatographic techniques, most simply by TLC, to determine the reaction time , i.e. when the starting materials have been consumed. Application of standard quantitative chromatographic methods, e.g. GC or... 

The confirmation of pesticides by GC/MS should be more reliable than that on the GC-ECD using an alternate column. Presence of stray interference peaks, even after sample cleanup, and the retention time shift and coelution problem, often necessitate the use of GC/MS in compounds identification If a quantitative estimation is to be performed, select the primary ion or one of the major characteristic ions of the compounds and compare the area response of this ion to that in the calibration standard. Quantitation, however, is generally done from the GC-ECD analysis, because ECD exhibits a much greater sensitivity than the mass selective detector (MSD). For example, while ECD is sensitive to 0.01 ng dieldrin, the lowest MSD detection for the same compound is in the range of 1 ng. The primary and secondary characteristic ions for qualitative identification and quantitation are presented in Table 2.20.3. The data presented are obtained under MS conditions utilizing 70 V (nominal) electron energy under electron impact ionization mode. 

Internal standard areas and acceptance limits Raw data for each sample, blank, spike, duplicate, and standard (quantitation reports, reconstructed ion chromatograms) Raw and background subtracted mass spectra for each target analyte found Tentatively identified compounds mass spectra with library spectra of 5 best-fit matches Sample preparation bench sheets Gel permeation chromatography clean-up logs S S S S S S S ... 

External standard quantitation involves the preparation of a classical calibration curve, as shown in Figure 4.6a. Standard samples are prepared at various concentrations over the desired range and analyzed. A calibration... 

Although internal standard calibration compensates for some errors in external standard quantitation, there are several difficulties in method development. First, choosing an appropriate internal standard can often be difficult, as this compound must be available in extremely pure form and it must never appear in the samples of interest. Second, it cannot interfere in either the extraction or the chromatography of the analytes. Finally, it must be structurally similar to the analytes, so that it undergoes similar extraction and chromatography, otherwise, the compensation will be lost. 

Acceptable laboratory method blanks must not contain any chemical interference or electronic noise at the m/z of the specified unlabeled PCDD/PCDF ions that is greater than 5 percent of the signal of the appropriate internal standard quantitation ion. 

All positive samples associated with a contaminated method blank and any samples which contain peaks that do not meet all of the qualitative identification criteria in Section 11 associated with a contaminated method blank must be reextracted and reanalyzed. Acceptable laboratory method blanks must not contain any chemical interference or electronic noise at the m/z of the specified unlabeled PCDD/PCDF ions that is greater than five percent of the signal of the appropriate internal standard quantitation ion. A peak that meets identification criteria in the method blank must not exceed two percent of the signal of the appropriate internal standard. 

Internal standardization Quantitative measurements may be made by an internal standard method using heptadecanoic acid which can be added to the samples before transesterification. The amount added is dependent on the concentration of free fatty acids in the sample. 

Finally, in conjunction with research on modification there must be a concomitant and commensurate research effort to develop standardized quantitative methods for measuring functional properties of conventional and modified proteins. 

Several recommendations arose from the interlaboratory smdy to minimize analytical challenges and to ensure data quality. As discussed above, it is recommended that mass labelled PFCs be employed as internal standards [93, 97]. It should be noted, however, that some electrospray ionization suppression may still occur if these internal standards are used at high concentrations [97]. Matrix effects can also be minimized by employing matrix-matched calibration standards in lieu of solvent-based calibration standards [97]. Unfortunately, matrix-matched standards can be impractical when an appropriate clean matrix cannot be found [94]. Other quality assurance and quality control measures, such as spike and recovery analyses of an analyte added to the sample matrix, repetitive analysis of samples to determine precision and comparison of internal standard quantitation to quantitation via standard additions, are also useful in determining data quality [94]. 

Exposure frequency The number of times an exposure occurs in a given period exposme may be continuous, discontinuous but regular (e.g. once daily) or intermittent (e.g. less than daily, with no standard quantitative definition) (REAP, 1995). 

---