Standard of the procedure

It is important to distinguish between controllable and noncontrollable sources of biological variation. Some factors may be controlled by the standardization of the procedure for preparation of reference individuals and specimen collection (see a later section of this chapter). Other factors, such as age and gender, may be relevant partitioning criteria, The remaining sources of variation should be considered when defining the criteria for the selection of reference individuals. 

In this frame, special procedures have been devised for the detection and quantification of specific products, including the development of fast and reliable liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods that are also suitable for detecting multiple and simultaneous reactions at different amino acid side chains. These dedicated procedures are advantageous in that they may not involve the complete and time-consuming routine of hydrolysis and chromatography, but special attention must be paid to the standardization of the procedures, and to the presence of interfering materials. 

Precipitation gravimetry continues to be listed as a standard method for the analysis of Mg + and S04 in water and wastewater analysis. A description of the procedure for Mg + was discussed earlier in Method 8.1. Sulfate is analyzed by precipitating BaS04, using BaCb as the precipitant. Precipitation is carried out in an... 

Tuberculocidal Test. The tubercle bacillus is resistant to disinfectants because the cells are protected with a waxy coating that is not readily penetrated. The tuberculocidal test is a use dilution practical type test that employs porcelain cylinders. The bacteria are different from those in the use dilution method (Table 10), the incubation time is longer, and the details of the procedure are different. For example, in the tuberculocidal test the test is divided into two parts, a presumptive test and a confirmatory test. The former employs Mycobacterium smegmatis and the latter employs Mycobacterium bovis (BCG). For the presumptive test the incubation time is 12 days, as against 48 hours for other bacteria used in the use-dilution method. For the confirmatory test the incubation time is 60 days, with an additional 30 days in case there is no growth. As shown in Table 10, the concentrations of the phenol standard are higher than used with other bacteria. 

Scheme 4 shows in a general manner cyclocondensations considered to involve reaction mechanisms in which nucleophilic heteroatoms condense with electrophilic carbonyl groups in a 1,3-relationship to each other. The standard method of preparation of pyrazoles involves such condensations (see Chapter 4.04). With hydrazine itself the question of regiospecificity in the condensation does not occur. However, with a monosubstituted hydrazine such as methylhydrazine and 4,4-dimethoxybutan-2-one (105) two products were obtained the 1,3-dimethylpyrazole (106) and the 1,5-dimethylpyrazole (107). Although Scheme 4 represents this type of reaction as a relatively straightforward process, it is considerably more complex and an appreciable effort has been expended on its study (77BSF1163). Details of these reactions and the possible variations of the procedure may be found in Chapter 4.04. 

For standardization of validation procedure we suggested normalized coordinate system (NCS) X. = 100-C/C", Y. = 100-A/A", where C is a concentration, A - analytical response (absorbance, peak ai ea etc.), index st indicates reference solution, i - number of solution. In this coordinate system recuperation coefficient (findings in per cent to entry) is found as Z = IQQ-Y/X. As a result, coordinates of all methods ai e in the unified... 

Life cycle assessment is defined by ISO 14040 as compilation and evalu ation of inputs, outputs and the potential environmental impacts of a product system throughout its life cycle. The ISO standards regulate the procedural aspects of LCA. They do not, however, provide all the information required for carrying out an LCA study. The main phases of LCA are goal and scope definition, inventory, impact assessment, and interpretation. The various applications of LCA are not regulated by the standard (Fig. 15.1). 

The standard advises that the range and detail of the procedures that form part of the quality system depend upon the complexity of the work, the methods used, and the skills and training needed by personnel involved in carrying out the activity. 

The standard requires the procedures for control of nonconforming product to apply to any product which fails to pass any inspection and/or test. 

It provides a standardized procedure to ensure consistency among analysts. This was tested by carrying out two independent evaluations of the same task. Of the 60 errors identified in the above validation study, 70% were common to both analysts. Of the remainder, 11 differences were due to differences in knowledge of the equipment by the two analysts and 5 were due to different interpretations of the procedures. 

As stated in previous sections of this chapter, there exists at all times a statutory and common law duty on all employers (which includes all engineers) to maintain a safe working environment for all their employees and the public at large. Additionally, it is contractual obligation on the insured under liability insurance policies to maintain the best reasonable standards of working procedures, equipment and the environment at all times. Consequently, there is a duty on all engineers to conduct their... 

Standard addition. A known amount of the constituent being determined is added to the sample, which is then analysed for the total amount of constituent present. The difference between the analytical results for samples with and without the added constituent gives the recovery of the amount of added constituent. If the recovery is satisfactory our confidence in the accuracy of the procedure is enhanced. The method is usually applied to physico-chemical procedures such as polarography and spectrophotometry. 

We may now deal with some of the procedures employed in quantitative spectrographic analysis. In the comparison sample method, the spectrum of an unknown sample is compared with the spectra of a range of samples of known composition (e.g. those supplied by the US Bureau of Standards) with respect to a particular component or components. The spectra of the unknown and of the various standards are photographed on the same plate under the same conditions. The concentrations of the desired constituent can then be estimated by comparing the blackening of the lines of the particular constituent with the same lines on the standards visual or photometric comparison of blackening may be used. 

The most common direct methods are the oven, the distillation, and the Fischer methods. They can be made precise by careful standardization of the experimental procedures their accuracy can be assured only by calibration against some accurate reference method. 

A detailed history and cutaneous examination is performed in all patients prior to chemical peeling. The peeling procedure should be explained in depth to the patient including a discussion of the benefits, as well as the risks of the procedure. In addition, standardized photographs are taken of the areas to be peeled, including full frontal and lateral views. 

There is a discrepancy between the cyanide criteria for both aquatic and drinking water standards and the current analytical technology. The criteria are stated for free cyanide (which Includes hydrocyanic acid and the cyanide ion), but the EPA approved analytical methodology for total cyanide measures the free and combined forms (11). This test probably overestimates the potential toxicity. An alternative method (cyanides amenable to chlorination) measures those cyanide complexes which are readily dissociated, but does not measure the iron cyanide complexes which dissociate in sunlight. This method probably tends to underestimate the potential toxicity. Other methods have been proposed, but similar problems exist (12). The Department of Ecology used the EPA-approved APHA procedure which includes a distillation step for the quantification of total cyanide (13,14). A modification of the procedure which omits the distillation step was used for estimation of free cyanide. Later in the study, the Company used a microdiffusion method for free cyanide (15). 

Just like all herbal medicinal preparations, C. sativa should be standardized if extracts or whole plant material are to be used for medicinal purposes. Basic requirements are that all detectable constituents should be known, but also a sustainable quahty control system must be established to achieve the same quahty over all batches. For industrial use of cannabis, standardization could also be necessary to equahze the quality of the product. However, it must be stated that cultivation for this purposes is mostly performed outdoors. Outdoor growth makes standardization of the product difficult due to the environmental changes. For this reason the Dutch medicinal C. sativa is grown under strictly controllable conditions, and therefore indoors, by the company Bedrocan. At this company clones are used for breeding to maintain high standards for quantity and quality. After a strictly selective breeding procedure a plant fine has been estabhshed fulfilhng all criteria as a herb for medicinal use. 

The specifications and standardization include raw materials, preparation method of the standard solution, concentration of proteins, and the main band on SDS-PAGE. The outline of the procedure for preparation of the calibrators is shovm in Eig. 4.2. Table 4.5 shows the raw materials and the preparation method of the initial extract. To prepare the calibrators, the raw materials are extracted by the standard solution containing SDS and mercaptoethanol. The initial extract is prepared by centrifugation and filtration of the extract. The diluted extract is then prepared by 10-fold dilution of the initial extract with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS pH 7.4). The protein concentration of the diluted extract is assayed using the 2-D Quant kit (Amersham Bio Sciences). The standard solution is then... 

For confirmatory methods, the confirmatory procedure criteria described previously should be met. All negative control samples should fail to meet the confirmation standard established in the procedure. All samples fortified at or above the tolerance and all incurred residue samples at or above the tolerance should meet the confirmation standard (to confirm) described in the SOP. It has been argued that it is not necessary for incurred samples containing the marker residue at a concentration below the tolerance to meet established confirmatory criteria. However, failure to confirm the marker residue in these samples may indicate a lack of robusmess of the procedure. Any procedure that had this problem would be closely examined to ensure that the method would meet the needs of the Agency. 

Finally, the method must be shown to be practical for use as a routine monitoring method. The method must use commercially available reagents, standards, and equipment. The method must not be too complex or poorly described such that an experienced analytical chemist could not understand or perform the method. Steps of the procedure that are critical should be highlighted in the method so that they can be appropriately controlled. The method must be short enough so that it can be used... 

Beasley et al. developed a panel of immunoassays to monitor DDT, its metabolites, and structurally related compounds, but they found that milk has a severe effect on the assay performance. They found that when directly utilizing whole milk, color development was completely inhibited. Even when using 1 100 dilutions of whole milk, the assay sensitivity was reduced by 90% (based on the IC50 shift, not simply the dilution factor). A number of procedures were evaluated to eliminate the interferences from the fat-soluble analytes. However, many of the procedures that removed interferences also removed the analytes. Extraction with a mixture of solvents and the use of similarly processed blank milk to prepare the standards ultimately yielded more accurate results. This article demonstrates the difficulties encountered in analyzing lipid-soluble analytes. 

Spencer and Brewer [144] have reviewed methods for the determination of nitrite in seawater. Workers at WRc, UK [ 145] have described an automated procedure for the determination of oxidised nitrogen and nitrite in estuarine waters. The procedure determines nitrite by reaction with N-1 naphthyl-ethylene diamine hydrochloride under acidic conditions to form an azo dye which is measured spectrophotometrically. The reliability and precision of the procedure were tested and found to be satisfactory for routine analyses, provided that standards are prepared using water of an appropriate salinity. Samples taken at the mouth of an estuary require standards prepared in synthetic seawater, while samples taken at the tidal limit of the estuary require standards prepared using deionised water. At sampling points between these two extremes there will be an error of up to 10% unless the salinity of the standards is adjusted accordingly. In a modification of the method, nitrate is reduced to nitrite in a micro cadmium/copper reduction column and total nitrite estimated. The nitrate content is then obtained by difference. 

---