Specificity control methods comparison

This is illustrated here in the case of a micronised DS for which SSA determination has been found to be relevant for its intended application. All four above mentioned techniques have been applied. A comparison and discussion of the obtained results considering the simplifying assumptions specific to each method have proved to be useful for understanding the micronized DS powder texture and for selecting a relevant quality control method. 

If this comparison of the selectivity of different columns does indeed demonstrate that the observed difference correlates with a difference in the batch of packing material, then there are two possible solutions to the problem. One possibility is to reserve a quantity of bulk packing or packed columns specifically for the customer or even at the customer s site. This is the best solution if the separation is needed only for a limited amount of time. If, on the other hand, the separation will be needed for many years to come, as is often the case with quality control methods, it is better to redevelop and harden the method. Often, only a small change in the mobile phase conditions is necessary to solve the problem. N ow that everybody is aware of the potential differences in the method on different batches of packing, one should check the reproducibility on several new batches of packing. Several column manufacturers offer reproducibility test kits that contain several different batches of packing and enable such studies. 

The numerical modeling methods for polymer blends have been reviewed in this chapter, with different categories such as volume-of-fluid, molecular dynamics and diffusion-controlled methods being introduced. Use of the Cahn-Hilliard method was emphasized for binary and ternary polymer systems with no obvious mechanical flux, while specific factors such as elastic energy and functionalized substrate were considered for purposes of comparison. The diffusion-controlled model described, using the Cahn-Hilliard equation as the constitutive equation, can be used to depict the gradient of the interface as well as the composition profile of partially miscible blends hence, it is feasible to implement this equation in a polymer blend system. It should be noted that although these examples do not consider mechanical flux, additional constitutive equations (e.g., Navier-Stokes) can easily be added to this diffusion-controlled model. 

Various methods can be used to analy2e succinic acid and succinic anhydride, depending on the characteristics of the material. Methods generally used to control specifications of pure products include acidimetric titration for total acidity or purity comparison with Pt—Co standard calibrated solutions for color oxidation with potassium permanganate for unsaturated compounds subtracting from the total acidity the anhydride content measured by titration with morpholine for content of free acid in the anhydride atomic absorption or plasma spectroscopy for metals titration with AgNO or BaCl2 for chlorides and sulfates, respectively and comparison of the color of the sulfide solution of the metals with that of a solution with a known Pb content for heavy metals. 

From the standpoint of collector design and performance, the most important size-related property of a dust particfe is its dynamic behavior. Particles larger than 100 [Lm are readily collectible by simple inertial or gravitational methods. For particles under 100 Im, the range of principal difficulty in dust collection, the resistance to motion in a gas is viscous (see Sec. 6, Thud and Particle Mechanics ), and for such particles, the most useful size specification is commonly the Stokes settling diameter, which is the diameter of the spherical particle of the same density that has the same terminal velocity in viscous flow as the particle in question. It is yet more convenient in many circumstances to use the aerodynamic diameter, which is the diameter of the particle of unit density (1 g/cm ) that has the same terminal settling velocity. Use of the aerodynamic diameter permits direct comparisons of the dynamic behavior of particles that are actually of different sizes, shapes, and densities [Raabe, J. Air Pollut. Control As.soc., 26, 856 (1976)]. 

The Production Department was not amused, because lower values had been expected. Quality Control was blamed for using an insensitive, unse-lective, and imprecise test, and thereby unnecessarily frightening top management. This outcome had been anticipated, and a better method, namely polarography, was already being set up. The same samples were run, this time in duplicate, with much the same results. A relative confidence interval of 25% was assumed. Because of increased specificity, there were now less doubts as to the amounts of this particular heavy metal that were actually present. To rule out artifacts, the four samples were sent to outside laboratories to do repeat tests with different methods X-ray fluorescence (XRFi °) and inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP). The confidence limits were determined to be 10% resp. 3%. Figure 4.23 summarizes the results. Because each method has its own specificity pattern, and is subject to intrinsic artifacts, a direct statistical comparison cannot be performed without first correcting the apparent concentrations in order to obtain presumably true... 

Until 1991, manufacturers seeking authorizations for pesticides had to fulfil country-specific requirements of validation of enforcement methods. The term enforcement method means analytical methods which are developed for post-registration control and monitoring purposes. The harmonization of these requirements was initiated with the European Economic Community (EEC) Council Directive 91/414/EEC and temporarily finalized with the Guidance Document on Residue Analytical Methods SANCO/825/00 rev. 6, dated 20 June 2000 [Santd et Protection des Consommateurs (SANCO)]. The evaluation of validation studies by the competent authority is conducted by comparison of these European Union (EU) requirements with the study results and most often without any practical experience of the method. Some details of this evaluation are discussed below. 

Localized NMR spectroscopy, which is often called as MRS in comparison with MRI, is not so familiar technique in food science, because a specific pulse sequence such as ISIS and a facility which can precisely follow the pulse sequence without any contamination from other position is needed for localization of position. The localized NMR is usually used together with NMR imaging. The study of solid/liquid ratios, fat structure and polymorphism and the kinetics of fat crystallization was reviewed [24], The potential of applications in food process development and control was offered. The localized spectra of sausages in areas of 0.3 mm X 0.05 mm (thickness of sample =1.5 mm) were obtained by the spin echo 2DFT method [113], in which the difference in the tissue structure was discussed with relation to the process and original materials. McCarthy et al. determined mobility of water in foams by using a localized spectroscopy [114]. T2 relaxation time varies in the foam as function of diameter and its variation was analyzed by the classic 2-state fast exchange model. 

Several studies have recently focused on determination of the contributions of the main sources of PM and the total carbonaceous fraction (carbonaceous matter, CM) in ambient air at receptor sites. Although the contribution of WB to PM and CM cannot be determined directly, various methods for source apportionment based on statistical approaches and on single or multiple specific tracers are available and have been applied in the past. All of these methods have advantages and limitations, a problem that is common to all of them is - that validation of the results is not possible due to the absence of a correct determination method. Therefore, plausibility checks and comparisons of results obtained with different methods are important for quality control. 

Participation in interlaboratory comparisons and proficiency-testing programs provides additional information especially pertinent to controlling interlaboratory variation. Aliquots of homogeneous samples containing the analytes of interest are drawn and distributed to each participating laboratory. The participants results are used to calculate overall and method-specific statistics, such as means, medians, and standard devia-... 

---