Sample solvent-free

Trimpin, S., Wijerathne, K., and McEwen, C.N. (2009) Rapid methods of polymer and polymer additives identification Multi-sample solvent-free MALDl, pyrolysis at atmospheric pressure, and atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta, 654, 20-25. 

A solvent free, fast and environmentally friendly near infrared-based methodology was developed for the determination and quality control of 11 pesticides in commercially available formulations. This methodology was based on the direct measurement of the diffuse reflectance spectra of solid samples inside glass vials and a multivariate calibration model to determine the active principle concentration in agrochemicals. The proposed PLS model was made using 11 known commercial and 22 doped samples (11 under and 11 over dosed) for calibration and 22 different formulations as the validation set. For Buprofezin, Chlorsulfuron, Cyromazine, Daminozide, Diuron and Iprodione determination, the information in the spectral range between 1618 and 2630 nm of the reflectance spectra was employed. On the other hand, for Bensulfuron, Fenoxycarb, Metalaxyl, Procymidone and Tricyclazole determination, the first order derivative spectra in the range between 1618 and 2630 nm was used. In both cases, a linear remove correction was applied. Mean accuracy errors between 0.5 and 3.1% were obtained for the validation set. 

Mancozeb is a dithiocarbamate pesticide with a very low solubility in organic and inorganic solvent. In this work we have developed a solvent free, accurate and fast photoacoustic FTIR-based methodology for Mancozeb determination in commercial fungicides. The proposed procedure was based on the direct measurement of the solid samples in the middle infrared region using a photoacoustic detector. A multivariate calibration approach based on the use of partial least squares (PLS) was employed to determine the pesticide content in commercially available formulations. 

Ascending, one-dimensional development in a twin-trough chamber with chamber saturation with the layer being preconditioned in the solvent-free half of the trough for 15 min after application of the sample. 

During the last few years, miniaturization has become a dominant trend in the analysis of low-level contaminants in food and environmental samples. This has resulted in a significant reduction in the volume of hazardous and expensive solvents. Typical examples of miniaturization in sample preparation techniques are micro liquid/liquid extractions (in-vial) and solvent-free techniques such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Combined with state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation, this trend has resulted in faster analyses, higher sample throughputs and lower solvent consumption, whilst maintaining or even increasing assay sensitivity. 

The concept of SPME was first introduced by Belardi and Pawliszyn in 1989. A fiber (usually fused silica) which has been coated on the outside with a suitable polymer sorbent (e.g., polydimethylsiloxane) is dipped into the headspace above the sample or directly into the liquid sample. The pesticides are partitioned from the sample into the sorbent and an equilibrium between the gas or liquid and the sorbent is established. The analytes are thermally desorbed in a GC injector or liquid desorbed in a liquid chromatography (LC) injector. The autosampler has to be specially modified for SPME but otherwise the technique is simple to use, rapid, inexpensive and solvent free. Optimization of the procedure will involve the correct choice of phase, extraction time, ionic strength of the extraction step, temperature and the time and temperature of the desorption step. According to the chemical characteristics of the pesticides determined, the extraction efficiency is often influenced by the sample matrix and pH. 

Principles and Characteristics Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a patented microscale adsorp-tion/desorption technique developed by Pawliszyn et al. [525-531], which represents a recent development in sample preparation and sample concentration. In SPME analytes partition from a sample into a polymeric stationary phase that is thin-coated on a fused-silica rod (typically 1 cm x 100 p,m). Several configurations of SPME have been proposed including fibre, tubing, stirrer/fan, etc. SPME was introduced as a solvent-free sample preparation technique for GC. 

Solid-phase microextraction eliminates many of the drawbacks of other sample preparation techniques, such as headspace, purge and trap, LLE, SPE, or simultaneous distillation/extraction techniques, including excessive preparation time or extravagant use of high-purity organic solvents. SPME ranks amongst other solvent-free sample preparation methods, notably SBSE (Section 3.5.3) and PT (Section 4.2.2) which essentially operate at room temperature, and DHS (Section 4.2.2),... 

Whereas SPE is a sample cleanup method, SPME is essentially a solvent-free sampling method. Stir bars in hyphenated SBSE-TDS-CGC configuration for product control analysis are a powerful tool for the extraction and analysis of organic compounds in aqueous matrices. 

Many of the adverse consequences of injecting dirty samples can be prevented or minimised by the use of guard columns, as discussed earlier, but often some form of sample clean-up is needed as well. The goal of sample preparation is to obtain, from the sample, the components of interest in solution in a suitable solvent, free from interfering constituents of the matrix, at a suitable concentration for detection and measurement. Naturally we want to do this with the minimum time and expense. 

An explosion temperature has been published, but a solvent-free sample standing... 

The crude imidoester should be used as a concentrated solution in ether. A small solvent-free sample exploded violently. 

It needs to be pointed out, that the investigation of some technically important polymers like polyolefines has not been very successful so far. Owing to their inert nature they are difficult to dissolve and also difficult to ionize. Typically one needs for the ionization process some heterogeneities or double bonds in the polymer. For some insoluble substances a solvent-free sample preparation method has been developed that allows a characterization by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry [93]. 

Z. Zhang, M. J. Yang, J. Pawliszyn, Solid phase microextraction a solvent free alternative for sample preparation, Anal. Chem., 66, 844A 853A (1994). 

Property measurements of fullerenes are made either on powder samples, films or single crystals. Microcrystalline C6o powder containing small amounts of residual solvent is obtained by vacuum evaporation of the solvent from the solution used in the extraction and separation steps. Pristine Cgo films used for property measurements are typically deposited onto a variety of substrates (< . , a clean silicon (100) surface to achieve lattice matching between the crystalline C60 and the substrate) by sublimation of the Cr,o powder in an inert atmosphere (e.g., Ar) or in vacuum. Single crystals can be grown either from solution using solvents such as CS and toluene, or by vacuum sublimation [16, 17, 18], The sublimation method yields solvent-free crystals, and is the method of choice. 

S. D. Hanton and D. M. Parees. Extending the Solvent-Free MALDI Sample Preparation Method. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 16(2005) 90-93. 

In the 1990s, Pawliszyn [3] developed a rapid, simple, and solvent-free extraction technique termed solid-phase microextraction. In this technique, a fused-silica fiber is coated with a polymer that allows for fast mass transfer—both in the adsorption and desorption of analytes. SPME coupled with GC/MS has been used to detect explosive residues in seawater and sediments from Hawaii [33]. Various fibers coated with carbowax/divinylbenzene, polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene, and polyacrylate are used. The SPME devices are simply immersed into the water samples. The sediment samples are first sonicated with acetonitrile, evaporated, and reconstituted in water, and then sampled by SPME. The device is then inserted into the injection port of the GC/MS system and the analytes thermally desorbed from the fiber. Various... 

Figure 11. Solvent free energies for the electron transfer reaction Fe + e <- Fe in bulk water (top panel) and at the water/Pt(100) interface (bottom panel) at T = 300 K. In each panel, the solid line gives the results of umbrella sampling molecular dynamics, and the thin line is the best parabolic fit to the bottom region of each curve. (Adapted from Ref. 163.)...

Fig. 10.8. Comparison of spectra of the organic dye pigment red 144 as obtained by (a) LDI, (b) solvent-based and (c) solvent-free MALDI sample preparation. Adapted from Ref. [109] by permission. John WUey Sons, 2001. 

For standard MALDI sample preparation, the analyte should be soluble to about 0.1 mg ml in some solvent. If an analyte is completely insoluble, solvent-free sample preparation may alternatively be applied (Chap. 10.4.3). The analyte may be neutral or ionic. Solutions containing metal salts, e.g., from buffers or excess of non-complexated metals, may cause a confusingly large number of signals due to multiple proton/metal exchange and adduct ion formation even complete suppression of the analyte can occur. The mass range of MALDI is theoretically almost unlimited in practice, limits can be as low as 3000 u, e.g., with polyethylene, or as high as 300,000 u in case of antibodies. 

Prans, J.K. Vietzke, J.-P. Strassner, M. Rapp, C. Hintze, U. Konig, W.A. Characterization of Low Molecular Weight Hydrocarbon Oligomers by Laser Desorp-tion/Ionization-TOF-MS Using a Solvent-Free Sample Preparation Method. Rapid... 

---