Sample preparation flow injection analysis

The major sample preparation techniques that are amenable to automation are solid-phase extraction, LC, dialysis, microwave sample preparation, flow injection analysis, and segmented flow analysis. Other sample preparation techniques, such as liquid-liquid extraction or ultrafiltration, may be possible to automate but may not be cost effective. This shortlist of amenable techniques may constrain an analysis, but there is a large body of experience in the literature to help a novice to use these procedures. 

Sample preparation, injection, calibration, and data collection, must be automated for process analysis. Methods used for flow injection analysis (FLA) are also useful for reliable sampling for process LC systems.1 Dynamic dilution is a technique that is used extensively in FIA.13 In this technique, sample from a loop or slot of a valve is diluted as it is transferred to a HPLC injection valve for analysis. As the diluted sample plug passes through the HPLC valve it is switched and the sample is injected onto the HPLC column for separation. The sample transfer time typically is determined with a refractive index detector and valve switching, which can be controlled by an integrator or computer. The transfer time is very reproducible. Calibration is typically done by external standardization using normalization by response factor. Internal standardization has also been used. To detect upsets or for process optimization, absolute numbers are not always needed. An alternative to... 

Flow injection analysis is based on the injection of a liquid sample into a continuously flowing liquid carrier stream, where it is usually made to react to give reaction products that may be detected. FIA offers the possibility in an on-line manifold of sample handling including separation, preconcentration, masking and color reaction, and even microwave dissolution, all of which can be readily automated. The most common advantages of FIA include reduced manpower cost of laboratory operations, increased sample throughput, improved precision of results, reduced sample volumes, and the elimination of many interferences. Fully automated flow injection analysers are based on spectrophotometric detection but are readily adapted as sample preparation units for atomic spectrometric techniques. Flow injection as a sample introduction technique has been discussed previously, whereas here its full potential is briefly surveyed. In addition to a few books on FIA [168,169], several critical reviews of FIA methods for FAAS, GF AAS, and ICP-AES methods have been published [170,171]. 

Gel Permeation Chromatography. A Water Associates model 200 gel permeation chromatograph fitted with five Styragel columns having nominal porosity designations 107, 107,106, 1.5 X 105, and 1.5 X 104 A was used for the analysis of molecular weight distribution in TFE at a temperature of 50.0 0.5°C and a flow rate of 1.00 =t 0.05 ml/min. Further details concerning instrumental and operational parameters, sample preparation and injection, and data acquisition and reduction have been reported elsewhere (I). 

Arce et al. [39] developed a flow injection analysis (F1A) system (Fig. 5.3) for online filtration of water samples prior to CE analysis. They also constructed a pump-driven unit for extraction and filtration of soil samples combined with CE in an online mode (automated sample transfer between pre-CE sample preparation step and the CE) [40]. The method was precise and four times faster than conventional methods of sample preparation with an off-line unit. Blood samples are centrifuged immediately to remove red blood cells and the serum is stored as discussed above. Sometimes, urine samples also contain precipitates which are removed by centrifuge. 

Trace metals have been measured in various tissues by ICP-MS to investigate Alzheimer s disease [249-252]. Various sample preparation and processing approaches have been used, including flow injection analysis and extraction. Al, Si, and Sn levels were reported to be higher than in healthy tissue, whereas zinc and selenium concentrations were lower. In the temporal cortex there were also reductions of cesium and cerium concentrations. The mechanisms responsible and the key elements remain incompletely understood. 

Takeuchi et al. published a mechanized assay of serum cholinesterase by specific colorimetric detection of the released acid [40]. The cholinesterase reaction was carried out on a thermostatted rack at 30° C with a reaction mixture of serum (10 pL), 50mM barbitone-HCl assay buffer (pH 8.2 140 pL), and 12.5 mM acetylcholine solution (50 pL). The solutions were prepared by programmed needle actions, and a sample blank was also prepared. The reaction was stopped after 9.7 min by injection of the mixture into a flow injection analysis system to determine the quantity of acetic acid formed. The carrier stream (water, at 0.5mL/min) was merged with a stream (0.5mL/min) of 20 mM 2-nitrophenylhydrazine hydrochloride in 0.2 M HC1 and a stream (0.5 mL/min) of 50 mM 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl-aminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride in ethanol containing 4% of pyridine. The sample was injected into this mixture (pH 4.5), passed through a reaction coil (10 m x 0.5mm) at 60°C, 1.5M NaOH was added, and, after passing through a second reaction coil (lm x 0.5 mm) at 60°C, the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. 

There have been several approaches to overcome the traditionally slow SEC separations, which are caused by the diffusion processes in SEC columns. Most of them are column-related (see High-Speed SEC Columns, Small Particle Technology, and Smaller SEC Column Dimensions ) one utilizes the column void volume (cf. Overlaid Injections ), while another replaces separation with simplified sample preparation (see Flow Injection Analysis ). Cloning existing methods and instrumentation is also reviewed with respect to the potential time gain (see Cloning of SEC Systems ). Benefits and limitations of each method are summarized in Table 1. 

Recently, ICH guidance Q6A has simplified the development of specifications in several ways, not the least of which is the clarification that impurities if already controlled in the API do not have to be controlled in the dosage form unless they are also degradants. For the release assay, this paves the way for simpler, but no less sophisticated methods that require minimal sample preparation. Thus, the future may bring a return to spectroscopic techniques such as ultraviolet/visible (LJV/vis) spectroscopy. There also may be increased use of other high-speed and high-precision techniques such as flow injection analysis (FIA) and near infrared (NIR) analysis. 

Because of the serial nature of LC-MS, much of the current discussion has centered on ways to reduce LC-MS/MS cycle time. Often the rate-limiting step for drug-discovery bioanalysis lies in the speed with which methods (sample preparation and chromatography) can be prepared for NCEs. One of the frequently overlooked steps is the need to tune and optimize MS/MS transitions for the various analytes studied. Fortunately, most MS vendors now offer semi- or fully automated procedures to perform this task. The origin for these procedures can be traced to the seminal work of Whalen et al., who published an automated procedure known as AUTOSCAN [106]. Itis possible to establish experimental conditions with this procedure in the flow-injection analysis (FIA) mode for 96 analytes in less than one hour. 

M. Miro, W. Frenzel, Automated membrane-based sampling and sample preparation exploiting flow-injection analysis, Trends Anal. Chem. 23 (2004) 624. 

Flow injection analysis (FIA) was first introduced by Ruzicka and Hansen in 1975. FIA is a technique for the manipulation of the sample and reagent streams in instrumental analysis. The purpose of flow injection is to have sample preparation and injection take place automatically in a closed system. The flow injection technique combines the principles of flow and batch type processing and it consists of a set of components which can be used in various combinations. 

Analysis in flowing solutions, as performed in particular with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and flow injection analysis, (FIA) has developed rapidly over the last decade and now plays an important function in most analytical laboratories throughout the world. There is little doubt, however, that even HPLC lacks the resolving power required to solve analytical problems in complex matrices with minimal sample preparation. Often, the resolving power of the detection method is called upon to assist in the solution of these problems. This is particularly true with electrochemical detection (ED) systems which offer a certain degree of selectivity based on differences in oxidation or reduction potentials of the species to be determined. In recent years, the advent of chemically modified electrodes (CMEs) has provided a stimulus to further improve both the sensitivity and selectivity of ED systems used in HPLC and FIA. 

Direct physical contact between the sensor reagent or transducer and the fiber is not a requirement. The indicator can also be in a sample that is viewed through a window the optical fiber, such as in a flow-injection-analysis sensing scheme used for process control ( ). Although such applications will be an Important part of optical sensor technology, the more demanding approach is the preparation of extrinsic sensors with the reagent phase attached directly to the fiber tip, a requirement for in vivo and in situ applications. The inventive work of sensor chemists now focuses... 

A second common linker is the acid cleavable linker. Treatment with 95% TFA cleaves the ligand. Evaporation and re-dissolution in acetonitrile prepares the sample for MS. For example, 50 pL of TFA was added to each vial, and the vials were left at room temperature for 60 minutes. The TFA was evaporated to dryness, and the sample re-dissolved in 25 uL of acetonitrile. Methanol is to be avoided at this point because methanolic TFA, even if dilute, is an effective methylating milieu. The mass spectrum is most readily obtained by positive ion electrospray ionization. But we also employ negative ion electrospray when advantageous. Flow injection analysis can be used for sample introduction but conventional or capillary LC provide better sensitivity and the opportunity to compare LC/UV and LC/MS profiles for more complete characterization. 

The automation of systems for sample preparation is still far from being implemented in laboratories for routine analysis. Up until now, automation has been done only for preliminary chemistry when only relatively simple processes are required, such as filtration, dissolution in water, extraction systems. The methods of flow injection analysis have contributed to the automation processes. 

The coupling of sensors with flow injection analysis (FIA) is already a very popular option. The flow regime offers important advantages over discrete manual measurements that include (1) Sample preparation processes such as reagent mixing, selectivity enhancement (e.g., removal of large molecular mass interferents such as protein by dialysis in clinical assays), and solvent extraction can all be carried out online. The improved sample preparation and more reproducible sample delivery result in improved measurement precision and accuracy. Drift is less of a problem as measurements are made of peak heights relative to a baseline. (2) Improved sensor lifetime in flow analysis, the sensor may be exposed to the sample for only a short period of time, and maintained in a friendlier matrix between measurements that can help counteract or delay the deleterious effects of the sample. (3) Automation the entire analysis can be... 

---