Sample application automated

Coupled spectroscopic methods such as TLC-UV (ultraviolet) and visible spectroscopy, TLC-mass spectrometry, and TLC-FTIR (Fourier transform infrared) have been developed to overcome this difficulty [7]. Their future application in the TLC analysis of natural pigments will markedly increase the information content of this simple and interesting separation technique. The automation of the various steps of TLC analysis (sample application, automated developing chambers, TLC scanners, etc.) greatly increased the reliability of the method, making it suitable for official control and legislative purposes [8]. 

A second fully automated device, the HPTLC applicator AS 30 (described earlier), can be employed in connection with a sampling device. Automated refilling of the syringe is performed by editing a volume factor, e.g., 10 for application of 10 times 100 pi. This device can be recommended if loss of sample is not relevant (e.g., owing to automatic rinsing operations that afford at least 70 pi dead volume for a minimal 20-cm tube connection). However, the fully automatic mode is not recommended for valuable samples. Sample volume still present in the Teflon tube between the sampler and AS 30 syringe will be wasted and lost because this operation cannot be circumvented by the user. 

Automated devices have been introduced for the three main steps of the chromatographic process, namely sample application, chromatogram development and evaluation. Appropriate sample application, i.e. its deposition on the plate as a small start zone, without damage to the solid-phase layer, is critical to the success of TLC. Sample application modes include spotting with the help... 

The main characteristic features of HPTLC (use of fine particle layers for fast separations, sorbents with a wide range of sorption properties, high degree of automation for sample application, development and detection) are the exact opposite of conventional TLC. Expectations in terms of performance, ease of use and quantitative information from the two approaches to TLC are truly opposite [419], Modern TLC faces an uncertain future while conventional TLC is likely to survive as a general laboratory tool. 

Automated Multiple Development System (AMD2) is a handy device that automatically develops the plates, dries them, and holds the plate in a clean environment for the analyst to document the findings. Several mobile phases can be mixed and preconditioning programs exist to expose the plate to specified solvents prior to development. Upon completion of the development of the plate, the solvent is evacuated and the plate is dried for the predetermined amount of time. The advantage to this system is the user can tend to other tasks without watching the plates develop. The disadvantage is that sample application still needs to occur separate from this unit. An example of this device is shown in Fig. 13.14. 

Online coupling SPE to either LC or GC is easily performed. In the simplest method, a precolumn is placed in the sample loop position of a six-port switching valve. After conditioning, sample application, and cleaning via a low-cost pump, the precolumn is coupled to an analytical column by switching the valve into the inject position. The solutes of interest are eluted directly from the piecolumn to the analytical column by an appropriate mobile phase. The sequence can be fully automated (Fig. 28). It is also a simple matter to enhance the gap between two solutes in elution from a precolumn (70). 

Table 3.15 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of various extraction techniques used in the analysis of semivolatile organic analytes in solid samples. They are compared on the basis of matrix effect, equipment cost, solvent use, extraction time, sample size, automation/unattended operation, selectivity, sample throughput, applicability, filtration requirement, and the need for evaporation/concentration. The examples that follow show the differences among these techniques in real-world applications. 

Optimal resolution for planar methods are only obtained when the application spot size or width at the origin is as small or narrow as possible. As with any chromatographic procedure, sample and solvent overloading will decrease resolution. Studies show that in most instances automated sample application is preferred over manual application especially when applications are greater than 15 /d [28]. Inadequate manual application of a sample will cause diffusion and double peaking. Depending on the purpose of the analysis, various sample amounts are recommended [29] and listed in Table 3.3. The design of commercially available automatic spotters has been reviewed [30]. 

When a lai e munber of sunples are to be applied, the use of a template to position the spots accurately is often helpful. Alternatively, automated spotting equipment can be used to apply precise amoimts of sample in tiie position required, either in spots or bands. These devices have tiie disadvantage of being e q)ensive, difficult to clem, and usually requiring pre-concentiation of the sample. Another approach to sample application involves tiie evaporation of measured voliunes of the sample in depressions in a non-wettable poljmier fihn. When (hy, the residues are transferred to the plate by pressing the film on to it. It is a very good procedme where the solution is viscous or where it needs to be concentiated. 

The availability of new materials, methods, and instrumentation over the last 10 years has so greatly altered TLC, that the new form is now called high performance TLC (HPTLC). The HPTLC plates are far superior to the conventional type, having much smaller particles (2 to 7 pm) as well as a very narrow particle size distribution. This makes HPTLC faster, more reproducible, more sensitive, and more accurate for quantitative work. Its growth in drug applications has been greatly speeded by the use of automated sample application devices and accurate densitometers. A comparison of HPTLC and TLC is given below. 

The method used for application of sample solutions is determined by whether HPTLC, TLC, or preparative layer chromatography (PLC) and qualitative or quantitative analysis are being performed. Sample volumes of 0.5-5 pi for TLC and 0.1-1 pi for HPTLC are applied manually to the layer origin as spots using fixed volume glass micropipets, such as Drummond Microcaps or selectable volume 10 or 25 pi digital microdispensers. In addition, many manual and automated instruments are available for sample application, especially for quantitative HPTLC. 

Fig. 9 Schematic diagram of the automated 4x4 sample application on HPTLC plate.

Pioneer work in thin-layer chromatography to isolate and analyze medicinal compounds was performed by Izmailov and Shraiber on unbound alumina as early as 1938.12 However, E. Stahl introduced the term thin-layer chromatography in 1956, which was considered the beginning of modern TLC.13 Since the 1960s, commercialization of precoated TLC plates and automation of sample application and detection have made it accessible to all laboratories. A number of valuable texts have been written about the history of TLC.14-20 The most recent one is reviewed by C. F. Poole.12... 

Fortunately, automated fiber-optic probe-based dissolution systems have begun to appear for these solid dosage-form applications. One such system uses dip-type UV transflectance fiber-optic probes, each coupled to a miniature photodiode array (PDA) spectrophotometer to measure drug release in real time. This fiber-optic dissolution system can analyze immediate- and controlled-release formulations. The system is more accurate and precise than conventional dissolution test systems, and it is easier to set up than conventional manual sampling or automated sipper-sampling systems with analysis by spectrophotometry or HPLC. 

Since the automated DTA apparatus has an upper temperature limit of about 500°C, its use has been restricted to intermediate temperature applications such as the deaquation of metal salt hydrate systems. It should find wide use in the routine DTA examination of both organic and inorganic samples. The automated features should permit convenient computer interfacing so that reaction temperatures, peak areas, purity calculations, AH calculations, and so on can be easily carried out. 

Baltussen, E., David, F., Sandra, P., Janssen, H.-G., and Cramers, C. A., Retention model for sorptive extraction-thermal desorption of aqueous samples application to the automated analysis of pesticides and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in water samples, J. Chromatogr. A, 805, 237-247, 1998. 

Further advances have resulted from developments in instrumentation, particularly in the areas of scanning densitometry and automated sample application, which have now made fully instrumental quantitative TLC a reality far removed from the basic practice. TLC is now regarded as an indispensable tool in both quality control and research laboratories. The technique is easy to learn and is fast and versatile and in many instances may be preferred to the techniques of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography. 

Flame ionisation detector and specific detector systems. TLC and HPTLC are fast and versatile analytical techniques and considerable time and energy has been expended to automate the various operational stages. In recent years there have been significant advances in the areas of sample application, solvent delivery, documentation and quantitation. 

Valve injection. Valve injection of the sample is now the preferred and accepted technique. Sample application is rapid, the solvent flow from the pump does not have to be stopped and these systems are easy to use, readily adapted for automated injection and can operate at pressures up to 6000psi (41.4MPa) with reproducibility >0.2%. Six-port valves are commonly used, either fitted with an internal or an external sample loop and are an integral component of an HPLC system. 

---