Safety observations management participation

Area meets its safety target for a quarter. Area diat maintains safety observation process for a year. Area discussion with plant manager Opportunity to participate on steering committee Time to discuss issues with supervision Lunch certificates... 

Managers Demonstrate a personal commitment to safety at all times Participate in incident investigation process Lead weekly safety meetings Conduct safety observations Participate in audits/ inspections ... 

Example activities for observable management involvement in safety, 7 1-4 Example employee participation plan, 9 1-5 General utility HSE responsibilities, 12 1-6 Tracking of training, 16... 

The instructor should tell all employees the location of their workstation and thank them for their participation. Also, the instructor should remember to tell participants that additional THIS observation cards are available at each workstation. If more cards are needed, they can be provided by the manager of quality assurance or safety representative. 

This study goes beyond much of the earlier research and— following the approach of Hunt and Habeck (1993) and Hunt et al. (1993)—seeks to estimate the role of HRM practices in the determination of workers compensation costs in a multivariate framework. It uses a workplace safety model that incorporates a wider variety of HRM practices than has been previously employed. In particular, it analyzes the impact of the three important dimensions of HRM practices on safety employee participation in decision making, employee participation in financial returns, and the firm s management safety culture. In addition, this is the first study to consider file effect of each of these factors on claim frequency and claim severity, and to ask whether any observed change is file result of changes in technical efficiency or moral hazard (principal-agent) incentives. 

A resource planning information and communication (ICT) system handles orders and communicates with customer companies. HSEQ issues of the supplying companies are communicated daily but not necessarily documented. The idea to involve Havator to participate in the current research was proposed by Kemi Shipping, and should be seen as part of HSEQ-related communication. Developing and planning is seen as part of every staff member s job however, managers and foremen in particular should observe how the level of safety and efiiciency in the workplace can be continuously improved. 

Abstract Local and short haul (L/SH) drivers work in various other work environments in addition to that of the truck cab, and the safety of these environments vary widely. In this study, we combined methods from three time perspectives accident statistics analyses (past) video observations (present) and scenario workshops (future) in order to provide new knowledge that can be applied to design and management process development in the transportation industry. Even though new technologies have and will emerge to ease drivers work, the work that is performed in environments other than truck cabs still involves tasks that require physical activities and pose risks of occupational diseases and accidents. Thus, drivers safety at work and work ability issues remain an area that needs continuous, systemic development. The results inevitably show that in order to successfully improve L/SH drivers work, the relevant stakeholders participation and a systemic approach is crucial. 

The unions must be involved. The unions on site were involved in the programme and some safety representatives acted as observers. Other safety representatives feared a conflict of roles and were apprehensive that their ability to defend a safety disciplinary case, or represent an employee in an accident, could be compromised. Nevertheless, the general feeling was that any increased workforce involvement must improve industrial relations. However, we do add a caution at this point, in that an organization should be aware that increased levels of participation by the workforce in one area will inevitably raise expectations elsewhere. If this is managed well it can only be beneficial to the organization and the self-development opportunities for employees. 

Moving from dependence to inter-dependence Fairly obviously, the implementation of the behavioural approach to safety (and indeed many other change initiatives) will only be effective in a situation of interdependence. If there is a high level of dependence on the part of participants, it will be very hard, if not impossible, to get them to take responsibility for checklists and observations. In fact, getting the balance right is quite difficult. Management must be involved and show interest and support where necessary, but must not take over, so that participants lose ownership, or withdraw too far, so that participants feel they have been abandoned. 

After our walk, we returned to a meeting room where the walk participants, who had been recording all of the opportunities for improvement we observed, read them aloud so they could be recorded on a flip chart. The safety manager offered to operate the flip chart to record the opportunities. As soon as he started to write, I understood why he volunteered. He did not attempt to record the details of what was being said but instead recorded... 

The positions interviewed in the 2013 data collection were captain, first officer, chief engineer, deck foreman, ROV supervisor, surveyor, mooring supervisors/controllers and marine representative for the operator (oil company). Interviews were transcribed from audio files, as all interviews were recorded. The quotes used in this article are all translated from Norwegian. Observations with conversations in between interviews were conducted over a period of around 14 hours daily. Observational notes were taken at the time the observation was made or shortly thereafter and included in a field log as documentation. As the observations, participation and interviews that form the empirical basis of this article were made and conducted in 2009 and 2013, respectively, comparisons allow for discussion on developments in both operational practices and safety management. 

Is being an observer voluntary For most organizations that implement behavioral safety, participation as an observer is voluntary for employees, but this is a decision that should be made by the design team. In some organizations, conducting observations is voluntary for employees but is required of managers, supervisors, and steering committee members. 

---