Risk assessment environmental impact

There is also an increasing need for a real-time data collection linked to the development of risk assessment, environmental impact assessment, and toxicology studies. 

Often contrasted in conceptual terms, EIA and RA have a common ultimate goal— the rational reform of policy-making (Andrews 1990). Both assessment tools are intended to provide reasoned predictions of possible consequences of planned decisions to facilitate wiser choices among the alternatives. To link risk assessment and impact assessment paradigms one can suggest a definition of environmental impact as any change in the level of risk undergone by receptors of concern that are reasonably attributable to a proposed project (Demidova, 2002). 

There is a potential health hazard when handling, and operating with, nitric acid. Nitric acid is a corrosive liquid that penetrates and destroys the skin and internal tissues. Contact can cause severe burns. The acid is a potential hazard, the various nitrogen oxides present as product intermediates in the process are also toxic. An assessment of the health risk must be fundamental to the design of any process. Further consideration and recommendations for the operating health risk and environmental impact of the plant are presented in Section 5.4. 

Environmental risk or environmental impact is an essential concept of green engineering (http //www.apa.govi ogpugreenengmeaning).1 There are numerous literature references on environmental risk assessment and some are included in the list of references in this chapter. Risk assessment considers the extent of harm a chemical and its uses pose to human health and the environment. Mathematically, it is expressed as a function of hazard and exposure ... 

The principal shortcoming with SCREENS is the lack of graphical displays. Interactive graphics that enable plume tracking are invaluable in assessing potential environmental impacts and public health risks from episodic releases. There are a... 

The Chemical Process Industry (CPI) uses various quantitative and qualitative techniques to assess the reliability and risk of process equipment, process systems, and chemical manufacturing operations. These techniques identify the interactions of equipment, systems, and persons that have potentially undesirable consequences. In the case of reliability analyses, the undesirable consequences (e.g., plant shutdown, excessive downtime, or production of off-specification product) are those incidents which reduce system profitability through loss of production and increased maintenance costs. In the case of risk analyses, the primary concerns are human injuries, environmental impacts, and system damage caused by occurrence of fires, explosions, toxic material releases, and related hazards. Quantification of risk in terms of the severity of the consequences and the likelihood of occurrence provides the manager of the system with an important decisionmaking tool. By using the results of a quantitative risk analysis, we are better able to answer such questions as, Which of several candidate systems poses the least risk Are risk reduction modifications necessary and What modifications would be most effective in reducing risk ... 

A risk estimate indicates Uie likelihood of occurrence of the different types of health or enviroinnental effects in exposed populations. Risk assessment should include both liuimn health and environmental evaluations (i.c., impacts on ecosystems). Ecological impacts include actual or potential effects on plants and animals (other than domesticated species). The number produced from the risk characleriznlion, representing the probability of adi crse... 

Assessing environmental risk from effluent discharges or for formal environmental impact assessment. 

Another problem of EGAs is that they are non-site-specific. The reasons for this lie in the fact that they include the whole life cycle of systems with resources which may originate in different countries and waste products and emissions which may distribute globally. They deal with factual inputs, outputs and the environmental impact potentials of the system under investigation on a global, and, in some cases, regional scale. Yet, they do not address the intrinsic risks resulting from the system itself. However, a combination with risk assessment methods can be used to close this gap. 

Has an environmental impact assessment been carried out for all unit processes Provide details of the assessments and identify the risk category for each process. 

The output of an exposure and risk assessment will usually describe the levels of exposure and quantity the population exposed for both humans and other biota, and will estimate the associated probabilities of the incidence of adverse health effects. Population exposure or risk, obtained by multiplying the individual (per capita) exposure or risk by the numbers exposed at each level of exposure, may also be a useful measure of impact. Various analyses can be performed on the results, for example, comparison of exposures in a particular geographic area against national average exposure levels. Likewise, for the same pollutant, environmental risks due to a particular industry might be compared against risks associated with occupational or household activities. In addition, the health risk of different substances could be compared for priority setting. 

In order to achieve that an environmental fate model is successfully applied in a screening level risk assessment and ultimately incorporated into the decisionmaking tools, the model should have computational efficiency and modest data input. Moreover, the model should incorporate all relevant compartments and all sources of contamination and should consider the most important mechanisms of fate and transport. Although spatial models describe the environment more accurately, such models are difficult to apply because they require a large amount of input data (e.g., detailed terrain parameters, meteorological data, turbulence characteristics and other related parameters). Therefore, MCMs are more practical, especially for long-term environmental impact evaluation, because of their modest data requirements and relatively simple yet comprehensive model structure. In addition, MCMs are also widely used for the comparative risk assessment of new and existing chemicals [28-33]. 

A Revision of Current Models for Environmental and Human Health Impact and Risk Assessment for Application to Emerging Chemicals... 

Keywords Environmental and risk assessment models, Life-cycle Impact assessment models, Physicochemical and toxicological database... 

The characteristics of the applied models have been described in detail in the chapters Environmental Fate Models [50] and A Revision of Current Models for Environmental and Human Health Impact and Risk Assessment for Application to Emerging Chemicals [49] and only a brief overview is given here. Since each model has its own approach (i.e., QWASI is focused on the aquatic system), the combined results are expected to give a wider view with in-depth analyses for different aspects compared to just one model with its special characteristics. 

---