Prediction from Scale Model

Readers are left to consider the logic the most extreme temperature prediction model was chosen simply because it produced day and night temperatures. That should have been a red flag. If seasonal or annual temperature predictions from a model are unreliable or extreme, then the smaller-scale values, such as daily or intra-day values, are even more unreliable. The USNA Synthesis Team should have checked predictions from its chosen... 

A few experiments have been carried out in the laboratory scale with a one litre hydrolysis vessel, connected to a small impeller pump and a Sartorius laboratory module fitted with DDS GR6-P membranes (0.2 m ). However, the flow resistance in this module was too large, and it was soon concluded that a resonably constant flux was unattainable. Despite these difficulties, the qualitative behaviour of the reactor variables could be predicted from the model and verified experimentally. For example, with decreasing flux DH increased, but the rate of the base consumption decreased, while the protein concentration in the permeate remained quite stable as predicted. The hydrolysate was evaluated and found comparable in quality to ISSPH produced in the batch process. These results have encouraged us to continue the work in pilot plant with the DDS-35 module, where we can expect considerably more favourable flow conditions. The first experiments carried out so far indicate that a reasonable flux in the order of 50 1/m /h (approx. 1 1/m /min.) can be attained but that foaming problems necessitate the construction of pressurized air free reactor. Future studies will therefore be needed to produce a complete experimental verification of the derived model. 

Recognizing that dynamic similarity can not be achieved, general quantitative predictions from laboratory models are not possible. It has often been found, however, that laboratory modeling is still valuable. The qualitative results obtained are often quite instructive. Additionally, many of the techniques applied in the laboratory can be adapted and applied to full scale mixing tests in actual industrial equipment. 

The slopes and the intercepts are similar to those of the fish baseline models (about 0.8-1 and -2 on the mmol/1 scale respectively), indicating a similar sensitivity of fish and daphnids towards non-specific toxicants. The derivation of almost identical models by different investigators with different sets of chemicals supports the reliability of these baseline QSARs for estimating the toxicity of non-polar non-reactive chemicals to Daphnia. Any compound is expected to be at least as toxic as predicted from these models. 

An Aspen Batch Plus model was developed for a product that was recently transferred to full-scale manufacture. The process was to be manufactured in a new facility for which the design was copied from an existing plant. The cycle time predictions from the model showed that this design of plant was not capable of producing the required amount of product and further isolation and drying equipment was necessary. The model was also used to predict VOC emission data used for initial abatement design. Outputs from the model were also used to describe the process flow, assist generation of batch records and estimate effluent stream composition. 

Predictions from the model for the osmotic coefficient can be made when the binary parameter between nmidissociated repeating units and the counterion of the low molecular weight salt, as well as the influence of that salt on the configurational parameter b are neglected. Figure 16 shows comparisons between experimental data and calculation results for the osmotic coefficient for aqueous solutions of a sodium poly(acrylate) (NaPA 15) and NaCl. The osmotic coefficient (on molality scale) is plotted versus the overall solute molality m, that is defined as ... 

Turbomachines can be compared with each other by dimensional analysis. This analysis produces various types of geometrically similar parameters. Dimensional analysis is a procedure where variables representing a physical situation are reduced into groups, which are dimensionless. These dimensionless groups can then be used to compare performance of various types of machines with each other. Dimensional analysis as used in turbomachines can be employed to (1) compare data from various types of machines—it is a useful technique in the development of blade passages and blade profiles, (2) select various types of units based on maximum efficiency and pressure head required, and (3) predict a prototype s performance from tests conducted on a smaller scale model or at lower speeds. 

The model is able to predict the influence of mixing on particle properties and kinetic rates on different scales for a continuously operated reactor and a semibatch reactor with different types of impellers and under a wide range of operational conditions. From laboratory-scale experiments, the precipitation kinetics for nucleation, growth, agglomeration and disruption have to be determined (Zauner and Jones, 2000a). The fluid dynamic parameters, i.e. the local specific energy dissipation around the feed point, can be obtained either from CFD or from FDA measurements. In the compartmental SFM, the population balance is solved and the particle properties of the final product are predicted. As the model contains only physical and no phenomenological parameters, it can be used for scale-up. 

Until about the second World War chemical processes were developed in an evolutionary way by building plants of increasing size and capacity. The capacity of the next plant in the series was determined by a scale-up factor that depended mainly upon experience gained from scale-ups of similar plants. Due to a lack of predictive models for chemical processes and operations, processes had to be scaled up in many small steps. This procedure was very expensive and the results unreliable. Therefore, large safety margins were incorporated in scale-up procedures, which often resulted in a significant unintended overcapacity of the designed plant. 

Since both the temperature dependence of the characteristic ratio and that of the density are known, the prediction of the scaling model for the temperature dependence of the tube diameter can be calculated using Eq. (53) the exponent a = 2.2 is known from the measurement of the -dependence. The solid line in Fig. 30 represents this prediction. The predicted temperature coefficient 0.67 + 0.1 x 10-3 K-1 differs from the measured value of 1.2 + 0.1 x 10-3 K-1. The discrepancy between the two values appears to be beyond the error bounds. Apparently, the scaling model, which covers only geometrical relations, is not in a position to simultaneously describe the dependences of the entanglement distance on the volume fraction or the flexibility. This may suggest that collective dynamic processes could also be responsible for the formation of the localization tube in addition to the purely geometric interactions. 

Fig. 30. Temperature dependence of the entanglement distance for polyethylene. > = 1 o O = 0.5. The dotted lines give a best fit for the data. The solid line represents the prediction by the scaling model of Graessley and Edwards (see text). (Reprinted with permission from [60]. Copyright 1993 American Chemical Society, Washington)...

The heat transfer from tubes in the freeboard was also measured for the 20 MW model. Figure 45 shows a comparison of the measured overall heat transfer coefficient in the 20 MW pilot plant versus that predicted from the scale model test. When the bed height is lowered, uncovering some tubes, the heat transfer is reduced because there are fewer particles contacting the tube surface. Although the scale model did not include proper scaling for convective heat transfer, the rate of change of the overall heat transfer should be a function of the hydrodynamics. 

As an example of how the dump option might be used, consider the problem of predicting whether scale will form in the wellbore as groundwater is produced from a well (Fig. 2.10). The fluid is in equilibrium with the minerals in the formation, so the initial system contains both fluid and minerals. The dump option simulates movement of a packet of fluid from the formation into the wellbore, since the minerals in the formation are no longer available to the packet. As the packet ascends the wellbore, it cools, perhaps exsolves gas as it moves toward lower pressure, and leaves behind any scale produced. The reaction model, then, is a polythermal, sliding-fugacity, and flow-through path combined with the dump option. 

Adjust values for the averaging time correction for plume predictions with Eq. (23-77). Note that the index p for use in the averaging time correction depends on the model used. If the hazard time scale th is different from the model averaging time scale (10 min for plumes), then the predicted concentration should be adjusted to but only if ts> t if ts < t then adjust the predicted concentration to ts. 

Matthews et al. (2000a) have developed a field-scale model of emissions based on the above approach. In addition to the processes discussed above, the field-scale model allows for added organic matter and soil organic matter separately, and for the effects of inorganic terminal electron acceptors. Figure 8.4 shows that the model was capable of predicting seasonal emissions at a particular site from model parameter values measured independent of the emission data. 

A simple environmental chamber is quite useful for obtaining volatilization data for model soil and water disposal systems. It was found that volatilization of low solubility pesticides occurred to a greater extent from water than from soil, and could be a major route of loss of some pesticides from evaporation ponds. Henry s law constants in the range studied gave good estimations of relative volatilization rates from water. Absolute volatilization rates from water could be predicted from measured water loss rates or from simple wind speed measurements. The EXAMS computer code was able to estimate volatilization from water, water-soil, and wet soil systems. Because of its ability to calculate volatilization from wind speed measurements, it has the potential of being applied to full-scale evaporation ponds and soil pits. 

The transport equations for laminar motion can be formulated, in general, easily and difficulties may lie only in their solution. On the other hand, for turbulent motion the formulation of the basic equations for the time-averaged local quantities constitutes a major physical difficulty. In recent developments, one considers that turbulence (chaos) is predictable from the time-dependent transport equations. However, this point of view is beyond the scope of the present treatment. For the present, some simple procedures based on physical models and scaling will be employed to obtain useful results concerning turbulent heat or mass transfer. 

In the above example, the process characteristics (here, power characteristics) presenting a comprehensive description of the process were evaluated. This often expensive and time-consuming method is certainly not necessary if one has to only scale-up a given process condition from the model to the industrial plant (or vice versa). With the last example and the assumption that the Ne (0 characteristics like those in Figure 3 are not explicitely known, the task is to predict the power consumption of a Rushton turbine of rotating with = 200/min. The air throughput be = 500m /hr and the material system is water/air. 

---