Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surfaces polar

By using an effective, distance-dependent dielectric constant, the ability of bulk water to reduce electrostatic interactions can be mimicked without the presence of explicit solvent molecules. One disadvantage of aU vacuum simulations, corrected for shielding effects or not, is the fact that they cannot account for the ability of water molecules to form hydrogen bonds with charged and polar surface residues of a protein. As a result, adjacent polar side chains interact with each other and not with the solvent, thus introducing additional errors. [Pg.364]

The MEP at the molecular surface has been used for many QSAR and QSPR applications. Quantum mechanically calculated MEPs are more detailed and accurate at the important areas of the surface than those derived from net atomic charges and are therefore usually preferable [Ij. However, any of the techniques based on MEPs calculated from net atomic charges can be used for full quantum mechanical calculations, and vice versa. The best-known descriptors based on the statistics of the MEP at the molecular surface are those introduced by Murray and Politzer [44]. These were originally formulated for DFT calculations using an isodensity surface. They have also been used very extensively with semi-empirical MO techniques and solvent-accessible surfaces [1, 2]. The charged polar surface area (CPSA) descriptors proposed by Stanton and Jurs [45] are also based on charges derived from semi-empirical MO calculations. [Pg.393]

Prediction of various physicochemical properties such as solubihty, lipophhicity log P, pfQ, number of H-donor and acceptor atoms, number of rotatable bonds, polar surface area), drug-likeness, lead-likeness, and pharmacokinetic properties (ADMET profile). These properties can be applied as a filter in the prescreening step in virtual screening. [Pg.605]

Rognan published the scoring function FRESNO (fast free energy scoring function), which considers a hydrogen-bond term, a lipophilic terra, a repulsive term for the buried polar surface, a rotational term, and a desolvation terra [82]. [Pg.611]

Molecular volume, surface area, polar surface 3D structure Polar surface area is the... [Pg.685]

Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Surfaces. Water is a small, highly polar molecular and it is therefore strongly adsorbed on a polar surface as a result of the large contribution from the electrostatic forces. Polar adsorbents such as most zeoHtes, siUca gel, or activated alumina therefore adsorb water more strongly than they adsorb organic species, and, as a result, such adsorbents are commonly called hydrophilic. In contrast, on a nonpolar surface where there is no electrostatic interaction water is held only very weakly and is easily displaced by organics. Such adsorbents, which are the only practical choice for adsorption of organics from aqueous solutions, are termed hydrophobic. [Pg.252]

Desiccants. A soHd desiccant is simply an adsorbent which has a high affinity and capacity for adsorption of moisture so that it can be used for selective adsorption of moisture from a gas (or Hquid) stream. The main requkements for an efficient desiccant are therefore a highly polar surface and a high specific area (small pores). The most widely used desiccants (qv) are siHca gel, activated alumina, and the aluminum rich zeoHtes (4A or 13X). The equiHbrium adsorption isotherms for moisture on these materials have characteristically different shapes (Fig. 3), making them suitable for different appHcations. [Pg.254]

The stmcture of SAMs is affected by the si2e and chemical properties of surface functionahties. Indeed, the introduction of any surface functionaUty reduces monolayer order. The impetus toward disorder may result from stericaHy demanding terminal groups, eg, —O—Si(CH2)2(C(CH2)3) (245) and —C H N Ru(NH2)5 (345,346), or from very polar surface groups, eg, OH, COOH, etc. In both cases, the disorder introduced may be significant and not confined only to the surface. [Pg.544]

Adsorption and Surface Chemical Grafting. As with siHca and many other siHcate minerals, the surface of asbestos fibers exhibit a significant chemical reactivity. In particular, the highly polar surface of chrysotile fibers promotes adsorption (physi- or chemisorption) of various types of organic or inorganic substances (22). Moreover, specific chemical reactions can be performed with the surface functional groups (OH groups from bmcite or exposed siHca). [Pg.351]

Adsorbents Table 16-3 classifies common adsorbents by structure type and water adsorption characteristics. Structured adsorbents take advantage of their crystalline structure (zeolites and sllicalite) and/or their molecular sieving properties. The hydrophobic (nonpolar surface) or hydrophihc (polar surface) character may vary depending on the competing adsorbate. A large number of zeolites have been identified, and these include both synthetic and naturally occurring (e.g., mordenite and chabazite) varieties. [Pg.1500]

For a polar surface and molecules with permanent dipole moments, attraction is strong, as for water adsorption on a hydrophilic adsorbent. Similarly, for a polar surface, a molecule with a permanent quadrupole moment vidll be attracted more strongly than a similar molecule with a weaker moment for example, nitrogen is adsorbed more strongly than oxygen on zeolites (Sherman and Yon, gen. refs.). [Pg.1503]

These difficulties have prompted a search for novel techniques for crystallization of membrane proteins. Two approaches have given promising results one using antibodies to solubilize the proteins and the second using continuous lipidic phases as crystallization media. Complexes with specific antibodies have larger polar surfaces than the membrane protein itself and are therefore likely to form crystals more easily in an aqueous enviroment. A recent example of an antibody-membrane protein complex utilized an Fv... [Pg.224]

Over 20 different methods have been proposed for predictions of secondary stmcture they can be categorized in two broad classes. The empirical statistical methods use parameters obtained from analyses of known sequences and tertiary stmctures. All such methods are based on the assumption that the local sequence in a short region of the polypeptide chain determines local stmcture as we have seen, this is not a universally valid assumption. The second group of methods is based on stereochemical criteria, such as compactness of form with a tightly packed hydrophobic core and a polar surface. Three frequently used methods are the empirical approaches of P.Y. Chou and G.D. Fasman and of J. Gamier, D.J. Osguthorpe and B. Robson (the GOR method), and third, the stereochemical method of V.l. him. [Pg.351]

Other polymers used in the PSA industry include synthetic polyisoprenes and polybutadienes, styrene-butadiene rubbers, butadiene-acrylonitrile rubbers, polychloroprenes, and some polyisobutylenes. With the exception of pure polyisobutylenes, these polymer backbones retain some unsaturation, which makes them susceptible to oxidation and UV degradation. The rubbers require compounding with tackifiers and, if desired, plasticizers or oils to make them tacky. To improve performance and to make them more processible, diene-based polymers are typically compounded with additional stabilizers, chemical crosslinkers, and solvents for coating. Emulsion polymerized styrene butadiene rubbers (SBRs) are a common basis for PSA formulation [121]. The tackified SBR PSAs show improved cohesive strength as the Mooney viscosity and percent bound styrene in the rubber increases. The peel performance typically is best with 24—40% bound styrene in the rubber. To increase adhesion to polar surfaces, carboxylated SBRs have been used for PSA formulation. Blends of SBR and natural rubber are commonly used to improve long-term stability of the adhesives. [Pg.510]

Typically, the polar surface energy component of polymers used for release coatings is relatively small and the work of adhesion can be written simply as... [Pg.537]

Solvent-borne adhesives. Although the NR polymer is inherently tacky, tack-ifying resins are generally added to improve bonding to polar surfaces. Because the solids content in these adhesives is lower than 35 wt%, they are not suitable for gap filling. The quick-grab (cements) adhesives are particular because they contain about 65 wt% rubber, and set within a few seconds under finger pressure. [Pg.648]

Wide substrate range. NBR adhesives are adequate to bond highly polar surfaces (steel, aluminium) but bond poorly to low-polar surfaces (polyethylene, natural rubber). [Pg.657]

Wide range of substrates. CR adhesives bond to almost any high-polar surface, as well as many low-polar surfaces (including polyolefins). [Pg.661]

Polyester diols are often combined with polyether diols to provide green strength through crystallization or elevated r . Most prevalent and least expensive is hexamethylene diol adipate (HDA) with a Tm of about 60°C. A variety of polyesters are available with various levels of crystallinity — from wax-like to amorphous — and crystallization rate, and with values ranging well below 0°C to above room temperature. Polybutadiene diols are the most expensive and most hydrophobic. They provide low surface tension and thus good wet out of non-polar surfaces. [Pg.733]

The more dispersive solvent from an aqueous solvent mixture is adsorbed onto the surface of a reverse phase according to Langmuir equation and an example of the adsorption isotherms of the lower series of aliphatic alcohols onto the surface of a reverse phase (9) is shown in figure 9. It is seen that the alcohol with the longest chain, and thus the most dispersive in character, is avidly adsorbed onto the highly dispersive stationary phase, much like the polar ethyl acetate is adsorbed onto the highly polar surface of silica gel. It is also seen that... [Pg.77]

In contrast, the mono-layer of methanol is built up much more slowly and is not complete until the concentration of methanol in the aqueous mixture is about 35%w/v. The behavior of methanol on the reverse phase is reminiscent of the adsorption of chloroform on the strongly polar silica gel surface. The complementary nature of the silica gel surface and that of the reverse phase is clearly apparent. It is also clear that strongly dispersive solvents might form bi-layers on the reverse phase surface just as polar solutes form bi-layers on the highly polar surface of silica gel. In fact, to date there has been no experimental evidence furnished that would support the formation of bi-layers on the surface of reverse phases, although their formation is likely and such evidence may well be forthcoming in the future. [Pg.78]

The results obtained by Brutin and Tadrist (2003) showed a clear effect of the fluid on the Poiseuille number. Figure 3.14 shows results of experiments that were done in the same experimental set-up for hydraulic diameters of 152 and 262 pm, using distilled water and tap water. The ion interactions with the surface can perhaps explain such differences. Tap water contains more ions such as Ca +, Mg +, which are 100 to 1,000 times more concentrated than H3O+ or OH . In distilled water only H30 and OH exist in equal low concentrations. The anion and cation interactions with the polarized surface could modify the friction factor. This is valid only in the case of a non-conducting surface. [Pg.129]

Preliminary data are consistent with the presence of —OH groups on the surface of SDIBS." These polar surface groups can also be used to reversibly hydrogen bond dmgs onto the surface, gaining control over subsequent dmg release profiles. [Pg.214]

In these studies the wall hydropathic state is varied to reveal the influence on nearby water molecules. In this example the wall is defined as a polar surface. [Pg.88]

Ertl P, Rohde B, Selzer P. Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. I Med Chem 2000 43 3714-7. [Pg.465]


See other pages where Surfaces polar is mentioned: [Pg.197]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.837]    [Pg.838]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.1808]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.716]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.891]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.412]   


SEARCH



Adsorbents surface polarity

Adsorption of Ionic Surfactants on Polar Surfaces

Cell surface polarity

Charged Polar Surface Area

Chemisorption surface polarization

Compound polar surfaces

Contact Angle, Surface Free Energy, and Polar Component

Design polar surface area

Dynamic polar molecular surface area

Dynamic polar surface area

Electronic structure of non-polar surfaces

Fermi surface spin polarized

Fractional polarity, surface tension measurement

Hydrogen bonds, contact with polar surfaces

Hydrogen bonds, contact with polar surfaces through

Hydrogen polar surface area

Interaction with polar surfaces

Intestinal Absorption the Role of Polar Surface Area

Ionic surfactant on polar surfaces

Mechanism surface polarization

Molecular descriptors polar surface area

Non-polar surface area

Non-polar surfaces

Oxygen-polar surface, zinc oxide

PSA, Polar surface area

Passive Membrane Permeability and the Polar Surface Area

Polar Sites on a Carbon Surface

Polar and nonpolar surfaces

Polar component of surface energy

Polar component of surface tension

Polar crystals, surface effects

Polar molecular surface area

Polar surface are

Polar surface area

Polar surface area , distributions

Polar surface area Subject

Polar surface area models

Polar surface energy

Polar surface intermolecular forces with adsorbents

Polar surface site

Polar surfaces, electronic structure

Polar surfaces, growth

Polarity of solid surface

Polarity on polymer surfaces

Polarization dependence surface

Polarization induced bound surface charge

Polarization of surfaces

Polarization surface charge

Polarization-modulation surface sensitive technique

Polarization-modulation surface structures, determination

Polarizing charge surface density

Profiling polar surface area

Properties polar surface area

Second-order surface polarization

Silica gels polar surface-modified

Spin-polarized surface electronic state

Surface Raman polarization

Surface anchoring energy polar

Surface area from electrode polarization

Surface elastic moduli polarization

Surface energy polar component

Surface nonlinear optical polarization

Surface polar groups

Surface polarity

Surface polarity SSFLCs

Surface polarity of the polymer

Surface polarity, criterion

Surface polarization

Surface polarization

Surface polarization current

Surface tension fractional polarity

Surface tension polar

Surface tension polar component

Surface-relief gratings polarization dependence

Surfactants and Wetting on Polar Surfaces

The Polar Surface Area and Its Application in Drug Discovery

Topological Polar Surface Area (tPSA) and Blood-Brain-Barrier Permeability (Log BB)

Topological descriptors polar surface area

Topological polar surface area

Total polar surface

Total polar surface area

Weakly polar surfaces

Wetting and Adhesion Determination of Surface Polarity

Wetting polar surfaces

Wurtzite polar surfaces

© 2024 chempedia.info