Ethyl acetate polarity

Fig. 8.2 P-estradioI crystallized from ethyl acetate. Polarized light microscopy.

Physical Properties. Furfuryl alcohol (2-furanmethanol) [98-00-0] is aHquid, colorless, primary alcohol with a mild odor. On exposure to air, it gradually darkens in color. Furfuryl alcohol is completely miscible with water, alcohol, ether, acetone, and ethyl acetate, and most other organic solvents with the exception of paraffinic hydrocarbons. It is an exceUent, highly polar solvent, and dissolves many resins. 

Solubility. One of PVP s more outstanding attributes is its solubility in both water and a variety of organic solvents. PVP is soluble in alcohols, acids, ethyl lactate, chlorinated hydrocarbons, amines, glycols, lactams, and nitroparaffins. SolubiUty means a minimum of 10 wt % PVP dissolves at room temperature (moisture content of PVP can influence solubiUty). PVP is insoluble in hydrocarbons, ethers, ethyl acetate, j -butyl-4-acetate, 2-butanone, acetone, cyclohexanone, and chlorobenzene. Both solvent polarity and H-bonding strongly influence solubiUty (77). 

Examples of mono-layer adsorption isotherms obtained for chloroform and butyl chloride are shown in Figure 5. The adsorption isotherms of the more polar solvents, ethyl acetate, isopropanol and tetrahydro-furan from -heptane solutions on silica gel were examined by Scott and Kucera [4]. Somewhat surprisingly, it was found that the experimental results for the more polar solvents did not fit the simple mono-layer... 

Consider the bi-layer adsorption of strongly polar solvent (B) (e.g., ethyl acetate) from a solution in a dispersive solvent (A) (e.g., n-heptane) onto a silica gel surface, as depicted in Figure 6. 

It should be noted that, due to the strong polarity of the hydroxyl groups on the silica, the initial adsorption of the ethyl acetate on the silica surface is extremely rapid. The individual isotherms for the two adsorbed layers of ethyl acetate are shown in Figure 8. The two curves, although similar in form, are quite different in magnitude. The first layer, which is very strongly held, is complete when the concentration of ethyl acetate is only about l%w/w. At concentrations in excess of l%w/w, the second layer is only just being formed. The formation of the second layer is much slower and the interactions between the solvent molecules with those already adsorbed on the surface are much weaker. 

From the point of view of solute interaction with the structure of the surface, it is now very complex indeed. In contrast to the less polar or dispersive solvents, the character of the interactive surface will be modified dramatically as the concentration of the polar solvent ranges from 0 to l%w/v. However, above l%w/v, the surface will be modified more subtly, allowing a more controlled adjustment of the interactive nature of the surface It would appear that multi-layer adsorption would also be feasible. For example, the second layer of ethyl acetate might have an absorbed layer of the dispersive solvent n-heptane on it. However, any subsequent solvent layers that may be generated will be situated further and further from the silica surface and are likely to be very weakly held and sparse in nature. Under such circumstances their presence, if in fact real, may have little impact on solute retention. 

Where there are multi-layers of solvent, the most polar is the solvent that interacts directly with the silica surface and, consequently, constitutes part of the first layer the second solvent covering the remainder of the surface. Depending on the concentration of the polar solvent, the next layer may be a second layer of the same polar solvent as in the case of ethyl acetate. If, however, the quantity of polar solvent is limited, then the second layer might consist of the less polar component of the solvent mixture. If the mobile phase consists of a ternary mixture of solvents, then the nature of the surface and the solute interactions with the surface can become very complex indeed. In general, the stronger the forces between the solute and the stationary phase itself, the more likely it is to interact by displacement even to the extent of displacing both layers of solvent (one of the alternative processes that is not depicted in Figure 11). Solutes that exhibit weaker forces with the stationary phase are more likely to interact with the surface by sorption. 

From the concentration of the solute in the solvent, and the total amount added the quantity of solute adsorbed on the stationary phase was also calculated. The results obtained for the solutes anisole and nitrobenzene are shown as graphs in Figure 12. One pair of curves refers to the polar solvent and relates the concentration of ethyl acetate in the solvent (Em) and the concentration of ethyl acetate in the stationary phase (Es) to the total mass of solute added. The other pair of curves refers to the... 

Paper strip chromatography showed approximately equal amounts of substrate and a more polar product (A -pregnadiene-9a-fluoro-11/3,l6a,17a,21-tetrol-3,20-dione 16,21-diacetate) together with very small amounts of two less polar products. Partition chromatography of 0.25 gram of the residue (diatomaceous earth column system 2 parts ethyl acetate,... 

Another important issue that must be considered in the development of CSPs for preparative separations is the solubility of enantiomers in the mobile phase. For example, the mixtures of hexane and polar solvents such as tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate, and 2-propanol typically used for normal-phase HPLC may not dissolve enough compound to overload the column. Since the selectivity of chiral recognition is strongly mobile phase-dependent, the development and optimization of the selector must be carried out in such a solvent that is well suited for the analytes. In contrast to analytical separations, separations on process scale do not require selectivity for a broad variety of racemates, since the unit often separates only a unique mixture of enantiomers. Therefore, a very high key-and-lock type selectivity, well known in the recognition of biosystems, would be most advantageous for the separation of a specific pair of enantiomers in large-scale production. 

Bonhote and co-workers [10] reported that ILs containing triflate, perfluorocar-boxylate, and bistrifylimide anions were miscible with liquids of medium to high dielectric constant (e), including short-chain alcohols, ketones, dichloromethane, and THF, while being immiscible with low dielectric constant materials such as alkanes, dioxane, toluene, and diethyl ether. It was noted that ethyl acetate (e = 6.04) is miscible with the less-polar bistrifylimide and triflate ILs, and only partially miscible with more polar ILs containing carboxylate anions. Brennecke [15] has described miscibility measurements for a series of organic solvents with ILs with complementary results based on bulk properties. 

From empirical observation, ILs tend to be immiscible with non-polar solvents. They can therefore be washed or brought into contact with diethyl ether or hexane to extract non-polar reaction products. Among solvents of greater polarity, esters (ethyl acetate, for example) exhibit variable solubility with ILs, depending on the nature of the IL. Polar or dipolar solvents (including chloroform, acetonitrile, and methanol) appear to be totally miscible with all ILs (excepting tetrachloroaluminate IL and the like, which react). Among notable exceptions, [EMIMJCl and [BMIMJCl are insoluble in dry acetone. 

Properties of luciferin. The luciferin of Odontosyllis is a highly polar substance. It is soluble in water, methanol, and DMF, but practically insoluble in ra-butanol, ethyl acetate and acetonitrile. The luciferin is strongly adsorbed onto DEAE-cellulose, even under acidic conditions, indicating that the molecule possesses a strong acidic functionality. Although the luciferin is unstable in the presence of air, it is quite stable in dilute methanol under argon at — 20°C. 

This means, in practice, that when employing a polar solvent with n-heptane (or any other paraffin for that matter) to reduce the retention, there will be a dramatic reduction in retention over the concentration range of about 0-2%w/v. However, subsequent changes in solute retention with polar solvent concentration will be relatively small. This will be true for any polar solute and was experimentally verified by Scott and Kucera for solutions of ethyl acetate, tetrahydrofuran and n-propanol in n-heptane. The very sensitive relationship between solvent concentration and retention at very low concentrations makes the phase system very difficult to make reproducible. This problem is one of the factors that deter analysts from using silica gel as a stationary phase for the separation of polar solutes. It is very satisfactory, however, for the separation of polarizable and weakly polar substances that can be eluted by paraffin/methylene dichloride or similar types of solvent mixtures. 

In any separation all the alternatives are possible, but it is more likely that for any particular solute, one type of interaction will dominate. Where there are multi-layers of solvent, the most polar is the solvent that interacts directly with the silica surface, and consequently constitutes the first layer. Depending on the concentration of the polar solvent, the next layer may be a second layer of the same polar solvent as in the case of ethyl acetate. If, however, the quantity of polar... 

If the mixture to be separated contains fairly polar materials, the silica may need to be deactivated by a more polar solvent such as ethyl acetate, propanol or even methanol. As already discussed, polar solutes are avidly adsorbed by silica gel and thus the optimum concentration is likely to be low, e.g. l-4%v/v and consequently, a little difficult to control in a reproducible manner. Ethyl acetate is the most useful moderator as it is significantly less polar than propanol or methanol and thus, more controllable, but unfortunately adsorbs in the UV range and can only be used in the mobile phase at concentrations up to about 5%v/v. Above this concentration the mobile phase may be opaque to the detector and thus, the solutes will not be discernible against the background adsorption of the mobile phase. If a detector such as the refractive index detector is employed then there is no restriction on the concentration of the moderator. Propanol and methanol are transparent in the UV so their presence does not effect the performance of a UV detector. However, their polarity is much greater than that of ethyl acetate and thus, the adjustment of the optimum moderator concentration is more difficult and not easy to reproduce accurately. For more polar mixtures it is better to explore the possibility of a reverse phase (which will be discussed shortly) than attempt to utilize silica gel out of the range of solutes for which it is appropriate. 

The more dispersive solvent from an aqueous solvent mixture is adsorbed onto the surface of a reverse phase according to Langmuir equation and an example of the adsorption isotherms of the lower series of aliphatic alcohols onto the surface of a reverse phase (9) is shown in figure 9. It is seen that the alcohol with the longest chain, and thus the most dispersive in character, is avidly adsorbed onto the highly dispersive stationary phase, much like the polar ethyl acetate is adsorbed onto the highly polar surface of silica gel. It is also seen that... 

The silica gel surface is extremely polar and, as a result, must often be deactivated with a polar solvent such as ethyl acetate, propanol or even methanol. The bulk solvent is usually an n-alkane such as n-heptane and the moderators (the name given to the deactivating agents) are usually added at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 5% v/v. Silica gel is very effective for separating polarizable materials such as the aromatic hydrocarbons, nitro hydrocarbons (aliphatic and aromatic), aliphatic ethers, aromatic esters, etc. When separating polarizable substances as opposed to substances with permanent dipoles, mixtures of an aliphatic hydrocarbon with a chlorinated hydrocarbon such as chlorobutane or methylene dichloride are often used as the mobile... 

Although catalytic hydrogenation is the method most often used, double bonds can be reduced by other reagents, as well. Among these are sodium in ethanol, sodium and rerr-butyl alcohol in HMPA, lithium and aliphatic amines (see also 15-14), " zinc and acids, sodium hypophosphate and Pd-C, (EtO)3SiH—Pd(OAc)2, trifluoroacetic acid and triethylsilane (EtsSiH), and hydroxylamine and ethyl acetate.However, metallic hydrides, such as lithium aluminum hydride and sodium borohydride, do not in general reduce carbon-carbon double bonds, although this can be done in special cases where the double bond is polar, as in 1,1-diarylethenes and in enamines. " °... 

The sodium and potassium salts of glutaconaldehyde are soluble only in polar solvents such as water, dimethyl sulfoxide, N,N-dimethylformamide, pyridine, and methanol. However, the stable tetrabutylammonium salt is soluble in relatively nonpolar solvents such as chloroform and ethyl acetate. It may be prepared from the potassium salt in the following manner. In a 1-1. Erlenmeyer flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar are placed a solution of 13.6g. (0.1 mole) of crude glutaconaldehyde potassium salt in 200 ml. of water and a solution of 33.9 g. (0.1 mole) of tetrabutyl-ammonium hydrogen sulfate in 200 ml. of ice-cold water, the pH of wliich was adjusted to 10 by adding aqueous 2M sodium hydroxide. 

After extraction, an extract purification stage is generally reconunended. This is most often done by liquid-solid exchange using resins such as Sephadex, Amber-lite XAD-7, or Cjg mini-columns. ° All the polar compounds are first trapped on the resin, and then in succession the sugars, acids, and other polar compounds (excluding polyphenolic compounds), polyphenolic compounds (excluding anthocyanidins), and anthocyanidins are respectively eluted with acidified water (HCl 0.01% v/v), ethyl acetate, and acidified methanol (HCl 0.01% v/v). 

For example, an alumina layer with a nonaqueons mobile phase was optimized for the separation of the taxoid fraction from ballast snbstances [5]. Figure 11.3 shows the densitogram obtained for Taxus baccata cmde extract chromatographed on the alnmina layer developed with nonaqueous elnents. The nse of ethyl acetate and dichloromethane enables elntion of nonpolar fractions (chlorophylls and waxes) and purification of the starting zone (Figure 11.3a). In this system, all taxoids are strongly retained on the alumina layer. The use of a more polar mobile phase... 

---