Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Chrysotile fibers

Chrysotile fibers can be extremely thin, the unit fiber having a diameter of approximately 25 nm (0.025 p.m). Industrial chrysotile fibers are aggregates of these unit fibers which usually exhibit diameters from 0.1 to 100 p.m their lengths range between a fraction of a mm to several cm, though most of the chrysotile fibers used are shorter than 1 cm. [Pg.346]

The two main amphibole asbestos fibers are amosite and crocidoHte, and both are hydrated siHcates of iron, magnesium, and sodium. The appearance of these fibers and of the corresponding nonfibrous amphiboles is shown in Figure 1. Although the macroscopic visual aspect of clusters of various types of asbestos fibers is similar, significant differences between chrysotile and amphiboles appear at the microscopic level. Under the electron microscope, chrysotile fibers are seen as clusters of fibrils, often entangled, suggesting loosely bonded, flexible fibrils (Fig. 2a). Amphibole fibers, on the other hand, usually appear as individual needles with a crystalline aspect (Fig. 2b). [Pg.346]

Fig. 4. Microscopic structure of chrysotile fibers (10). Reprinted with permission. Fig. 4. Microscopic structure of chrysotile fibers (10). Reprinted with permission.
The extent of substitution of magnesium and siUcon by other cations in the chrysotile stmcture is limited by the stmctural strain that would result from replacement with ions having inappropriate radii. In the octahedral layer (bmcite), magnesium can be substituted by several divalent ions, Fe ", Mn, or Ni ". In the tetrahedral layer, siUcon may be replaced by Fe " or Al ", leaving an anionic vacancy. Most of the other elements which are found in vein fiber samples, or in industrial asbestos fibers, are associated with interstitial mineral phases. Typical compositions of bulk chrysotile fibers from different locations are given in Table 3. [Pg.348]

In contrast to chrysotile fibers, the atomic crystal stmcture of amphiboles does not inherentiy lead to fiber formation. The formation of asbestiform amphiboles must result from multiple nucleation and specific growth conditions. Also, whereas the difference between asbestiform and massive amphibole minerals is obvious on the macroscopic scale, the crystalline stmctures of the two varieties do not exhibit substantial differences. Nonfibrous amphiboles also exhibit preferential cleavage directions, yielding fiber-shaped fragments. [Pg.348]

Chrysotile fibers tend to become negative after weathering and/or leaching. [Pg.350]

Also, the adsorption of anionic or neutral surfactants on chrysotile fibers in aqueous dispersions enhances fiber separation, with a concomitant increase of surface area (26). Such effects have not been reported for amphibole fibers. [Pg.351]

Adsorption and Surface Chemical Grafting. As with siHca and many other siHcate minerals, the surface of asbestos fibers exhibit a significant chemical reactivity. In particular, the highly polar surface of chrysotile fibers promotes adsorption (physi- or chemisorption) of various types of organic or inorganic substances (22). Moreover, specific chemical reactions can be performed with the surface functional groups (OH groups from bmcite or exposed siHca). [Pg.351]

Other fiber classification schemes have been devised for chrysotile fibers, but historically the QS grade system has been used as a reference other classification schemes usually have correspondence scales for conversion to the QS values. Amosite can be classified according to the QS grade system, but crocidohte requkes a different scheme (mainly due to the harshness of these fibers). [Pg.353]

SRM 1876b is intended for use in evaluating transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques used to identify and count chrysotile fibers. This SRM consists of sections of mixed-cellulose-ester filters containing chrysotile fibers deposited by an aerosol generator. [Pg.199]

Nanostructured materials are nothing new. Chrysotile fibers are an example (Fig. 16.22), as are bones, teeth and shells. The latter are composite materials made up of proteins and embedded hard, nanocrystalline, inorganic substances like apatite. Just as with the imitated artificial composite materials, the mechanical strength is accomplished by the combination of the components. [Pg.241]

Iron-, copper-, and zinc complexes of rutin, dihydroquercetin, and green tea epicatechins were found to be much more efficient inhibitors than parent flavonoids of toxic effects of chrysotile asbestos fibers on peritoneal macrophages and erythrocytes [168], It was proposed that in this case the enhanced activity of metal-flavonoid complexes was increased by the absorption on chrysotile fibers. [Pg.868]

The individual cylindrical chrysotile fibrils undoubtedly contribute to the occurrence of this mineral species in fibrous form and may account for some of the flexibility and enhanced tensile strength of chrysotile fibers. Aveston (1969, p. 632) commented that asbestos was inferior [in tensile strength]... [Pg.31]

Marconi, A., E. Menichini, and L. Paoletti (1984). A comparison of light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy results in the evaluation of the occupational exposure to airborne chrysotile fibers. Arm. Occup. Hyg. 26 321. [Pg.157]

Chrysotile A mineral in the serpentine group composed of hydrated magnesium silicate, which occurs in several crystalline modifications (see chapter 2) and usually in fibrous form. First described and named in 1834, chrysotile fibers were mined under the name serpentine-asbestos, or simply asbestos, long before that time. [Pg.193]

Physico-Chemical Properties. The industrial applications of chrysotile fibers were developed taking advantage of their particular combination of properties fibrous morphology, high tensile strength, resistance to heat and corrosion, low electrical conductivity, and high friction coefficient In many applications, the surface properties of the fibers also play an important role in such cases, a distinction between chrysotile and amphiboles can be... [Pg.149]

Dry Classification Method. The most widely accepted method for chrysotile fiber length characterization in the industry is the Quebec Standard lest (QS). [Pg.150]

Chrysotile fibers are the source of commercial asbestos, although fibrous amphiboles also contribute to similar usage. Asbestos is economically valuable for its incombustibility and low conductivity of heat, thus as fireproofing and insulating material. See also Asbestos. [Pg.1472]

Rotate the stage. Note that with the polars crossed, the fibers go to extinction every 90° and also have positions of maximum brightness 90° apart. Take note of morphology, chrysotile fibers appear to be fine and are often wavy. Amosite fibers look stiff and straight and fibrils coming off a bundle viewed at high magnification may resemble a household broom. [Pg.31]

Syrian hamsters exposed to the same diet. Aberrant crypt foci, putative precursors of colon cancer, were induced in rats given acute doses of chrysotile (70 mg/kg/day) or crocidolite (33 mg/kg/day) by gavage (Corpet et al. 1993). Overall, however, the data were interpreted as providing "some evidence" of carcinogenicity for intermediate range chrysotile fibers. No tumorigenicity was noted for short-range chrysotile (NTP 1985). [Pg.88]

The distribution of asbestos fibers has been investigated in a number of studies after exposure via intratracheal or intravenous injection. The translocation of chrysotile fibers from the lung to the pleura and mesothelium has been observed in rats exposed by intratracheal injection (Fasske 1988 Viallat et al. [Pg.103]


See other pages where Chrysotile fibers is mentioned: [Pg.344]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.867]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.104]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.182 ]




SEARCH



Chrysotile

© 2024 chempedia.info