Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface polarity, criterion

Unfortunately none of the various proposed forms of the potential theory satisfy this criterion Equation XVII-78 clearly does not Eq. XVII-79 would, except that / includes the constant A, which contains the dispersion energy Uo, which, in turn, depends on the nature of the adsorbent. Equation XVII-82 fares no better if, according to its derivation, Uo reflects the surface polarity of the adsorbent (note Eq. VI-40). It would seem that after one or at most two layers of coverage, the adsorbate film is effectively insulated from the adsorbent. [Pg.654]

The terms protection current and protection current densities refer to any values of total cathodic currents that meet the criterion in Eq. (2-40). However, in the field, and for designing cathodic protection stations, another term is of interest, the protection current requirement. This term is concerned with the lowest value of the protection current that fulfills the criteria in Eqs. (2-39) or (2-40). Since with an extended object having a surface S the polarization varies locally, only the current density for the region with the most positive potential has the value J. In other regions 17. 1 > 7. . For this reason, the protection current requirement 4 is given by ... [Pg.45]

Choquette et al. investigated the possibilities of using a series of substituted sulfamides as possible electrolyte solvents (Table 12). These compounds are polar but viscous liquids at ambient temperature, with viscosities and dielectric constants ranging between 3 and 5 mPa s and 30 and 60, respectively, depending on the alkyl substituents on amide nitrogens. The ion conductivities that could be achieved from the neat solutions of Lilm in these sulfamides are similar to that for BEG, that is, in the vicinity of 10 S cm Like BEG, it should be suitable as a polar cosolvent used in a mixed solvent system, though the less-than-satisfactory anodic stability of the sulfamide family might become a drawback that prevents their application as electrolyte solvents, because usually the polar components in an electrolyte system are responsible for the stabilization of the cathode material surface. As measured on a GC electrode, the oxidative decomposition of these compounds occurs around 4.3—4.6 V when 100 fik cm was used as the cutoff criterion, far below that for cyclic carbonate-based solvents. [Pg.143]

The bottleneck of a calculation in solution is the evaluation of the polarization which, in the case of PCM, corresponds to the evaluation of the apparent surface charges. In particular, the bottleneck is represented by the evaluation of the products between the integral matrices of the electrostatic potential (matrix S in Equation (1.8.6)) or of the normal component of the electric field (matrix D in Equation (1.92)) and the apparent charges vector q. Thus the criterion we use to compare the standard and the simultaneous approach is based on the number of matrix products (Sq or D q) necessary in the whole optimization process. We also remind the reader that the dimension of the matrices is equal to the square of the number of the surface elements. [Pg.75]

Criterion b demands detectability of the chemisorbed species of the poison. This point is particularly important in the case of proton acids, since the lifetime of protonated species may be very low due to the high mobility of surface protons. Thus, the pyridinium ion cannot be detected on silica surfaces, although some protonated species must have been formed (399), as can be shown from a continuous absorption in the infrared spectra. Protons that can hardly be detected directly by protonated probe molecules may well initiate catalytic reactions due to their polarizing action during their fluctuations (349,350). [Pg.259]

A simple process was used by Hickernell to determine polarity [3,95] the criterion is the etching behavior of the ZnO layer since the (OOl)-surface (O-terminated) shows an etching rate a factor of ten times greater than that of the (OOl)-surface (Zn-terminated). Perpendicular to the c-axis, the etching rate is 40-50 times the etching rate of the (OOl)-surfaces. [Pg.213]

Obviously, NiO(l 11) is terminated and stabilised by p(2x2) reconstructions with different internal configurations. Importantly the electrostatic criterion is always fulfilled showing that it is very important when polar surfaces are considered. Interestingly, the octopolar reconstruction prediction and the observation of the p(2x2) surface cell were far not enough to understand the polar NiO(lll) surface. Note also that oxide thin films may not exhibit the same surface structure as their bulk counterpart. The studies carried out on thin oxide films may thus only be carefully extrapolated to the bulk surface. [Pg.292]

In the prioritization step, all remaining structures that have not been rejected in the selection step are scored using the function described in section 8.3. It is possible to specify a lower limit for the score. LUDI will then accept only those structures with a score better than the user-defined threshold value. In addition, LUDI also tries to estimate the possible maximum score for each fragment (assuming a fully buried surface and the formation of hydrogen bonds with all polar groups of the fragment). The ratio actual score/possible maximum score can also be used as a selection criterion. [Pg.136]

The contact angle of 70° observed for a drop of methylene iodide is a criterion for the existence of an oleophobic film whose top surface is composed of an array of methyl groups. However, observation of such a contact angle is not a demonstration that the film formed by retraction of an adsorbing surface from a solution of a polar long-chain compound is... [Pg.205]

Figure 20.3c shows the effect of application of cathodic protection on carbonated concrete. The applied cathodic current density, even if it brings about only a small lowering of the steel potential, can produce enough alkalinity to restore the pH to values higher than 12 on the reinforcement surface and thus promote passivation. The effectiveness of cathodic protection in carbonated concrete was studied with specimens with alkaline concrete, carbonated concrete and carbonated concrete with 0.4% chloride by cement mass that were tested at current densities of 10, 5, and 2 mA/m (of steel surface) [45]. Carbonated concrete specimens polarised at 10 mA/m showed that, although initially protection was not achieved since the four-hour decay was slightly lower than 100 mV, after about four months of polarization, the protection criterion was fulfilled and higher values, in the range 200-300 mV of the four-hour potential decay were measured (Figure 20.6). The same results were obtained on carbonated and slightly chloride-contaminated concrete. Figure 20.3c shows the effect of application of cathodic protection on carbonated concrete. The applied cathodic current density, even if it brings about only a small lowering of the steel potential, can produce enough alkalinity to restore the pH to values higher than 12 on the reinforcement surface and thus promote passivation. The effectiveness of cathodic protection in carbonated concrete was studied with specimens with alkaline concrete, carbonated concrete and carbonated concrete with 0.4% chloride by cement mass that were tested at current densities of 10, 5, and 2 mA/m (of steel surface) [45]. Carbonated concrete specimens polarised at 10 mA/m showed that, although initially protection was not achieved since the four-hour decay was slightly lower than 100 mV, after about four months of polarization, the protection criterion was fulfilled and higher values, in the range 200-300 mV of the four-hour potential decay were measured (Figure 20.6). The same results were obtained on carbonated and slightly chloride-contaminated concrete.
Another criterion is defined as a minimum of 100 mV of cathodic polarization between the structure surface and a stable reference electrode contacting the electrolyte. The formulation or decay of polarization can be measured to satisfy this criterion. The -0.85V potential criterion states that voltage drops other than those across the structure-to-electrolyte boundary must be considered when interpreting the measurements. Two criteria, polarization and polarized potential, need to be considered. This is of utmost concern when evaluating potential measurements because only polarization provides cathodic protection. [Pg.500]

In most cases discussed in this review, no firm conclusions could be reached with respect to the actual mechanism even for Pt, the most thoroughly investigated electrode. Instead, two or more mechanisms were cautiously indicated as consistent with experimentally found mechanistic criteria Tafel slope, reaction orders with respect to H", or OH and O2, and stoichiometric number. The use of the stoichiometric number as a mechanistic criterion for oxygen electrode reactions requires caution because its determination from the cathodic and anodic Tafel slopes involves the assumption that the same rate-controlling process is involved for both. This is questionable in view of the large differences in potentials and hence large difference in the state of the electrode surface between the cathodic and anodic branches of the polarization curves. [Pg.343]


See other pages where Surface polarity, criterion is mentioned: [Pg.76]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.1557]    [Pg.1558]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.1006]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.741]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.197]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 ]




SEARCH



Polar surface

Surface polarization

© 2024 chempedia.info