Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Plant performance, analysis preparation

Unit layout as installed is the next step of preparation. This may take some effort if analysts have not been involvea with the unit prior to the plant-performance analysis. The equipment in the plant should correspond to that shown on the PFDs and P IDs. Wmere differences are found, analysts must seek explanations. While a hne-by-line trace is not required, details of the equipment installation and condition must be understood. It is particularly useful to correlate the sample and measurement locations and the bypasses shown on the P IDs to those ac tuaUy piped in the unit. Gas vents and liquid (particularly water-phase) discharges may have been added to the unit based on operating experience out not shown on the P IDs. While these flows may ultimately be small within the context of plant-performance an ysis, they may have sufficient impact to alter conclusions regarding trace component flows, particularly those that have a tendency to build in a process. [Pg.2553]

The intensity of the situation requiring the analysis may not allow analysts to develop a formal preparatory review of the unit as described below. Analysts must recognize that the incomplete preparation may result in a less efficient analysis of plant performance. [Pg.2552]

Confidence The accuracy of the conclusions drawn from any unit test depends upon the accuracy of the laboratory analyses. Plant-performance analysts must have confidence in these analyses including understanding the methodology and the limitations. This confidence is established through discussion, analyses of known mixtures, and analysis of past laboratory results. This confidence is established during the preparation stage. [Pg.2558]

Current methods for tropane alkaloids analysis have been well covered in the literature. An excellent comprehensive review written by B. Drager [45] appeared in 2002, describing the analysis of tropane and related alkaloids in plant material. Sample preparation procedures were reviewed, as well as the analytical methods used for performing the separation and detection of tropane alkaloids, such as gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC), and capillary electrophoresis (CE). Therefore, this chapter will not describe in detail these well-known analytical methods but discuss some recently developed applications for the analysis of tropane alkaloids in plant material and biological matrices. [Pg.348]

In the TLC analysis of dry extracts prepared from medicinal plants, the sample preparation is performed in a different way from that prescribed in the monographs for the drugs in the pharmacopoeias. Also, there is no binder in the recommended solvent system, and in these cases a validation of the new in-house method is certainly necessary. [Pg.224]

Whilst for the analysis of plant material for cannabinoids both GC and HPLC are commonly used, in analytical procedures the employment of GC-based methods prevails for human forensic samples. Nonetheless, the usage of HPLC becomes more and more of interest in this field especially in combination with MS [115-120]. Besides the usage of deuterated samples as internal standards Fisher et al. [121] describe the use of a dibrominated THC-COOH (see 7.5). The usage of Thermospray-MS and electrochemical detection provide good performance and can replace the still-used conventional UV detector. Another advantage in the employment of HPLC rather than GC could be the integration of SPE cartridges, which are needed for sample preparation in the HPLC-system. [Pg.31]

Sample preparation techniques vary depending on the analyte and the matrix. An advantage of immunoassays is that less sample preparation is often needed prior to analysis. Because the ELISA is conducted in an aqueous system, aqueous samples such as groundwater may be analyzed directly in the immunoassay or following dilution in a buffer solution. For soil, plant material or complex water samples (e.g., sewage effluent), the analyte must be extracted from the matrix. The extraction method must meet performance criteria such as recovery, reproducibility and ruggedness, and ultimately the analyte must be in a solution that is aqueous or in a water-miscible solvent. For chemical analytes such as pesticides, a simple extraction with methanol may be suitable. At the other extreme, multiple extractions, column cleanup and finally solvent exchange may be necessary to extract the analyte into a solution that is free of matrix interference. [Pg.630]

For pesticide residue immunoassays, matrices may include surface or groundwater, soil, sediment and plant or animal tissue or fluids. Aqueous samples may not require preparation prior to analysis, other than concentration. For other matrices, extractions or other cleanup steps are needed and these steps require the integration of the extracting solvent with the immunoassay. When solvent extraction is required, solvent effects on the assay are determined during assay optimization. Another option is to extract in the desired solvent, then conduct a solvent exchange into a more miscible solvent. Immunoassays perform best with water-miscible solvents when solvent concentrations are below 20%. Our experience has been that nearly every matrix requires a complete validation. Various soil types and even urine samples from different animals within a species may cause enough variation that validation in only a few samples is not sufficient. [Pg.647]

The active components of the herbaceaous perennial plant Hypericum perforatum are antiinflammatory, antidepressive and healing agents, therefore, their analysis is of considerable importance for health care. Samples were prepared by extracting the dried flowering tops by hot methanol. RP-HPLC separations were performed in an ODS column (250 X 4.6 mm i.d. particle size 5 pm) thermostated at 30°C. The steps of gradient elution are listed in Table 2.49. [Pg.162]

Direct injection API-Electrospray MS is capable of analyzing much larger and less volatile substances than either EI/MS or CI/MS. As a result, this method is often used to provide structural information on peptides, proteins, and polymers derived from both natural and synthetic processes it is also useful in the analysis of many natural compounds including molecules such as saponins and flavonol glycosides, derived from plants. When using direct injection API-electrospray, partial purification and EC preparation are performed elsewhere and a collected fraction is dissolved in an appropriate solvent and injected as a bolus into the mass spectrometer (flow or direct injection or syringe infusion). This has an advantage, as the mass... [Pg.153]

Using forensic photography as a precursor to any sample acquisition forms the foundation of the protocol, and allows purposive sampling. EDS should be performed to establish which elements to expect before attempting any quantitative elemental analysis such as ICP-OES/MS. Before working with actual artifacts, a set of replicated materials must be used and a successful trial run using the planned methods of analysis whether ICP-OES/MS, GC-MS or any others, must be achieved, so the methods of preparation can be adjusted properly. To facilitate this, appropriate materials must be replicated, which might mean that plants or minerals must be collected, and dyed or painted comparative standards must be created, so the unknown can be compared to the known. For many of the Old World dye plants these standards already exist. However, for North American dye plants comparative collections are in the early phases and subsequent analysis of colorant constituents have not yet been conducted (68,69). [Pg.38]

Washability analysis procedure used in a laboratory before preparation plant design to determine the cleaning processes to be employed and used during normal operation to evaluate the performance of the cleaning equipment and the amenability of the raw coal feed to the cleaning processes chosen (ASTM D-4371). [Pg.212]

In what many consider to be a landmark publication on metabolomics, Fiehn et al. (2000) state it is crucial to perform unbiased (metabolite) analyses in order to define precisely the biochemical function of plant metabolism. The authors argue that for metabolomics/metabolite profiling to become a robust and sensitive method suited to automation, a mature technology such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is required as an analytical technique. The authors go on to describe a simple sample preparation and analysis regime that allowed for the detection and quantification of more than 300 compounds from a single-leaf sample extract. [Pg.68]

The first step in the analysis of antioxidant phytochemicals is extraction of the compounds Ifom the plant matrix. The means by which the samples are prepared for extraction is very important because, if it is not carefully performed, compounds can be chemically altered or degraded during the process. In general, sample preparation conditions should avoid oxidation, excessive exposure to high temperatures, enzymatic reactions, and other chemical changes to the target compounds. The first step is to select a representative sample of plant material that has been collected as recently as possible. If extraction cannot be performed immediately, it is recommended that samples be stored at refrigeration... [Pg.27]


See other pages where Plant performance, analysis preparation is mentioned: [Pg.2552]    [Pg.2306]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.2556]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.238]   


SEARCH



Plant performance

Preparation plant

© 2024 chempedia.info