Micellar adsorption

Another important type of physical chemical interaction that may alter absorption is that of drug binding or adsorption onto the surface of another material. As with complexation and micellarization, adsorption will reduce the effective concentration gradient between gut fluids and the bloodstream, which is the driving force for passive absorption. While adsorption frequently reduces the rate of absorption, the interaction is often readily reversible and will not affect the extent of absorption. A major exception is adsorption onto charcoal, which in many cases appears to be irreversible, at least during the time of residence within the GIT. As a result, charcoal often reduces the extent of drug absorption. Indeed, this fact... 

The course of adsorption of a surfactant on the surface of a colloidal particle has been described by Void and Sivaramakrishnan (293) in discussing micellar adsorption. The polar surface is covered by the adsorbed surfactant oriented on the surface so that the exterior is hydrophobic. At a slightly higher concentration, additional adsorption occurs on this primary sorbed layer to form a condensed double layer over the surface, with the polar groups of the surfactant now oriented outward, thus making the surface hydrophilic. They presented experimental evidence to show that as more surfactant is added to the system, the concentration in solution decreases past a certain point because of the sudden aggregation of the adsorbed material to form the double layer of the surface micelles. 

The exact way in which the surfectant molecules organize on the CNT surface has already been extensively investigated. To briefty summarize the three main schools of thoughts structureless random adsorption on the CNT walls without any preferential arrangement of the head and tail, hemi-micellar adsorption on the CNT surface, and encapsulation of the CNTs in a cylindrical surfactant micelle. ... 

Figure 3.10 Schematic representations of the possible surfactant-SWCNT interaction models, (a) Hemi-micellar adsorption of surfactant molecules on a SWCNT. (b) Surfactant organized as spherical micelles on the surface of an SWCNT. (c) SWCNT encapsulated in a cylindrical surfactant micelle left side view right cross section.

Kekicheff P, Christenson FI K and Ninham B W 1989 Adsorption of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide to mica surface below the critical micellar concentration Colloid Surf. 40 31-41... 

Kovat s retention index (p. 575) liquid-solid adsorption chromatography (p. 590) longitudinal diffusion (p. 560) loop injector (p. 584) mass spectrum (p. 571) mass transfer (p. 561) micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (p. 606) micelle (p. 606) mobile phase (p. 546) normal-phase chromatography (p. 580) on-column injection (p. 568) open tubular column (p. 564) packed column (p. 564) peak capacity (p. 554)... 

An expression for the number of particles formed during Stage I was developed, assuming micellar entry as the formation mechanism (13), where k is a constant varying from 0.37 to 0.53 depending on the relative rates of radical adsorption in micelles and polymer particles, r is the rate of radical generation, m is the rate of particle growth, is the surface area covered by one surfactant molecule, and S is the total concentration of soap molecules. 

By 1980, research and development shifted from relatively inexpensive surfactants such as petroleum sulfonates to more cosdy but more effective surfactants tailored to reservoir and cmde oil properties. Critical surfactant issues are performance in saline injection waters, adsorption on reservoir rock, partitioning into reservoir cmde oil, chemical stabiUty in the reservoir, interactions with the mobiUty control polymer, and production problems caused by resultant emulsions. Reservoir heterogeneity can also greatly reduce process effectiveness. The decline in oil prices in the early 1980s halted much of the work because of the relatively high cost of micellar processes. 

An alternative to this process is low (<10 N/m (10 dynes /cm)) tension polymer flooding where lower concentrations of surfactant are used compared to micellar polymer flooding. Chemical adsorption is reduced compared to micellar polymer flooding. Increases in oil production compared to waterflooding have been observed in laboratory tests. The physical chemistry of this process has been reviewed (247). Among the surfactants used in this process are alcohol propoxyethoxy sulfonates, the stmcture of which can be adjusted to the salinity of the injection water (248). 

In another study of the physical behavior of soap-LSDA blends, Weil and Linfield [35] showed that the mechanism of action of such mixtures is based on a close association between the two components. In deionized water this association is mixed micellar. Surface tension curves confirm the presence of mixed micelles in deionized water and show a combination of optimum surface active properties, such as low CMC, high surface concentration, and low surface concentration above the CMC. Solubilization of high Krafft point soap by an LSDA and of a difficulty soluble LSDA by soap are related results of this association. Analysis of dispersions of soap-LSDA mixtures in hard water shows that the dispersed particles are mixtures of soap and LSDA in the same proportion as they were originally added. These findings are inconsistent with the view that soap reacts separately with hard water ions and that the resulting lime soap is suspended by surface adsorption of LSDA. The suspended particles are responsible for surface-active properties and detergency and do not permit deposits on washed fabric unlike those found after washing with soap alone. 

Etaulsifier Oiaracteristics. Tlie values for CHC , adsorption isotherm parameters and micellar specific surface for sodium lauryl sulitoate as previously reported ( ) have heen usea... 

Another method is based on the evaporation of a w/o microemulsion carrying a water-soluble solubilizate inside the micellar core [221,222], The contemporaneous evaporation of the volatile components (water and organic solvent) leads to an increase in the concentration of micelles and of the solubilizate in the micellar core. Above a threshold value of the solubilizate concentration, it starts to crystallize in confined space. Nanoparticle coalescence could be hindered by surfactant adsorption and nanoparticle dispersion within the surfactant matrix. 

Effectiveness of selective adsorption of phenanthrene in Triton X-100 solution depends on surface area, pore size distribution, and surface chemical properties of adsorbents. Since the micellar structure is not rigid, the monomer enters the pores and is adsorbed on the internal surfaces. The size of a monomer of Triton X-100 (27 A) is larger than phenanthrene (11.8 A) [4]. Therefore, only phenanthrene enters micropores with width between 11.8 A and 27 A. Table 1 shows that the area only for phenanthrene adsorption is the highest for 20 40 mesh. From XPS results, the carbon content on the surfaces was increased with decreasing particle size. Thus, 20 40 mesh activated carbon is more beneficial for selective adsorption of phenanthrene compared to Triton X-100. 

In a multiphase formulation, such as an oil-in-water emulsion, preservative molecules will distribute themselves in an unstable equilibrium between the bulk aqueous phase and (i) the oil phase by partition, (ii) the surfactant micelles by solubilization, (iii) polymeric suspending agents and other solutes by competitive displacement of water of solvation, (iv) particulate and container surfaces by adsorption and, (v) any microorganisms present. Generally, the overall preservative efficiency can be related to the small proportion of preservative molecules remaining unbound in the bulk aqueous phase, although as this becomes depleted some slow re-equilibration between the components can be anticipated. The loss of neutral molecules into oil and micellar phases may be favoured over ionized species, although considerable variation in distribution is found between different systems. 

Micellar flooding is a promising tertiary oil-recovery method, perhaps the only method that has been shown to be successful in the field for depleted light oil reservoirs. As a tertiary recovery method, the micellar flooding process has desirable features of several chemical methods (e.g., miscible-type displacement) and is less susceptible to some of the drawbacks of chemical methods, such as adsorption. It has been shown that a suitable preflush can considerably curtail the surfactant loss to the rock matrix. In addition, the use of multiple micellar solutions, selected on the basis of phase behavior, can increase oil recovery with respect to the amount of surfactant, in comparison with a single solution. Laboratory tests showed that oil recovery-to-slug volume ratios as high as 15 can be achieved [439]. 

Studies of the adsorption of surface active electrolytes at the oil-water interface provide a convenient method for testing electrical double layer theory and for determining the state of water and ions in the neighborhood of an interface. The change in the surface amount of the large ions modifies the surface charge density. For instance, the surface ionic area of 100 per ion corresponds to 16, /rC/cm. The measurement of the concentration dependence of the changes of surface potential were also applied to find the critical concentration of formation of the micellar solution [18]. 

In both cases, overall adsorption and especially that of sulfonate (or "primary surfactant in the composition of most micellar systems used for EOR) are considerably reduced by simply adding a second product having low adsorption characteristics (NP 30 EO in the above example). This is why we have called this strongly hydrophilic surfactant a desorbent. 

Figures 5 and 6 show that the concentration of the two surfactants in the effluents increases simultaneously with the production of the desorbent, which confirms the mixed micellization mechanism described above. Figure 5, where the three additives are produced lately, illustrates the phenomenon particularly well. At the lower pH corresponding to strong adsorption conditions for sulfonate (test 4), the one pore-volume micellar slug would have been entirely consumed by the medium in the absence of any desorbent.

Calculations were made at the desorbent concentrations used in Tests 3,6,7 and 8 in Table HI. Table IV below gives the respective adsorptions of sulfonate and desorbent as well as their equilibrium concentration. A comparison with the corresponding experimental values in Table HI shows good agreement with regard to sulfonate from the micellar slug. On the other hand, losses of desorbent are systematically underestimated. This shows that the assumption of the independent adsorption of both surfactants on the solid is incorrect and that presumably cooperative adsorption of desorbent and sulfonate takes place. Accordingly the model used needs to be improved. 

The critical micellar concentrations of anionic/nonionic surfactant mixtures examined are low in a saline medium, so that, at the concentrations injected in practice, the chromatographic effects resulting from the respective adsorption of monomers are masked. Such surfactants propagate simultaneously in the medium in the form of mixed micelles. 

In the micellar region the trend to decreasing colloid stability is arrested and a partial improvement, in line with the enhanced level of polymer adsorption, is noted until the conditions for gross phase separation are reached. Only the intermediate block copolymer BC 42 shows indications of discontinuities in behavior at the solvent composition for micelle formation. The results presented here do not show the sharp transition from stability to instability found experimentally (4,8,17) by Napper and generally expected on theoretical grounds. However, there are important differences in experimental methodology that must be emphasised. 

To illustrate how the effect of the adsorption on the modulus of the filled gel may be modelled we consider the interaction of the same HEUR polymer as described above but in this case filled with poly(ethylmetha-crylate) latex particles. In this case the particle surface is not so hydrophobic but adsorption of the poly (ethylene oxide) backbone is possible. Note that if a terminal hydrophobe of a chain is detached from a micellar cluster and is adsorbed onto the surface, there is no net change in the number of network links and hence the only change in modulus would be due to the volume fraction of the filler. It is only if the backbone is adsorbed that an increase in the number density of network links is produced. As the particles are relatively large compared to the chain dimensions, each adsorption site leads to one additional link. The situation is shown schematically in Figure 2.13. If the number density of additional network links is JVL, we may now write the relative modulus Gr — G/Gf as... 

---