Incineration technology

The emission control requirements set for municipal incinerators by the U.S. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (1) are extensive and complex. Many of the final standards have not been established as of the date of publication of this book. A thorough study of the regulations is necessary for any person dealing with incinerator technology and control. 

The basic configuration and features of the multiple hearth incinerator are illustrated in Figure 23. This incinerator is the most prevalent incinerator technology for the disposal of sewage sludge in the U.S. due to it s low ash discharge. Sludge cake enters the furnace at the top. The interior of the furnace is composed of a series of circular refractory hearths, which are stacked one on top... 

GENERAL OVERVIEW ON INCINERATOR TECHNOLOGY AND ASSOCIATED HAZARDS CONDUCT OF THE INSPECTION... 

Rather than focus on specific incineration technologies, one must address the fundamental physical and chemical processes common to many of the possible incineration systems through studies of (1) reaction kinetics of selected waste materials and (2) behavior of waste solutions, slurries, and solids in the incineration environment. 

Economic feasibility studies suggest that even at the present state of the art photocatalytic technology indeed can be competitive with the traditional carbon adsorption or incineration technologies in treatment of contaminated soil vapor extraction vents and small scale VOC-containing vents [28]. Rapid progress in basic and applied research in photocatalysis suggests... 

Incineration has been used extensively in hospitals for disposal of hospital wastes containing infectious and/or hazardous substances. Most hospital incinerators (over 80%), however, are outdated or poorly designed. Modem incineration technology, however, is available for complete destmction of organic hazardous and infectious wastes. In addition, adequate air pollution control facilities, such as scmbbers, secondary combustion chambers, stacks, and so on, are needed to prevent acid gas, dioxin, and metals from being discharged from the incinerators. 

The same modern incinerators equipped with scmbbers, bag-filters, electro-precipitators, secondary combustion chambers, stacks, etc., are equally efficient for disposal of hazardous PCBs, dioxin, USEPA priority pollutants, and so on, if they are properly designed, installed, and managed. Incineration technology is definitely feasible, and should not be overlooked. The only residues left in the incinerators are small amount of ashes containing metals. The metal-containing ashes may be solidified and then disposed of on a landfill site. 

The IT Corporation thermal destruction unit is a mobile unit that uses infrared incineration technology. The main objective of this process is to transform the feedstock into another form (an ash acceptable for delisting) while assuring safe discharge of exhaust gas products to the environment. The unit is capable of on-site remediation of wastes and soils contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and other organics. This technology is based on a conveyor belt furnace process. 

Rotary cascading bed incineration is an ex situ incineration technology that can treat organic-or hydrocarbon-contaminated materials such as sewage sludge, refinery sludge, coal tailings. 

The electric infrared incineration technology is a mobile thermal processing system that is suitable for soils or sediments contaminated with organic compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and metals. Liquid organic wastes can be treated after mixing with sand or soil. Electrically powered silicon carbide rods heat organic wastes to combustion temperature while any remaining combustibles are incinerated in an afterburner. 

Can further treat residues from physical/chemical, biological, or incineration technologies. 

T-Thermal Company has years of experience with incineration technology. 

National Incinerator Testing and Evaluation Program Mass Burning Incinerator Technology, Vol. II, Lavalin, Inc. Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, 1987. 

The Phase 1 quantitative risk assessment for Pueblo and several other stockpile sites with assembled chemical munitions completed several years ago showed that the stockpile at Pueblo presents risk to public health several orders of magnitude lower than any other site. This is because it contains only mustard agent, which is less volatile than other agents, and therefore would not be carried very far in the event of a fire or explosion. Nevertheless, the Army has undertaken several risk and safety assessments to meet the legislative requirement that the technology chosen for Pueblo be as safe as or safer than the baseline system. The committee believes that the incineration technologies under consideration will have very low risk and will meet reasonable interpretations of safety criteria, even if the actual risk numbers marginally exceed the baseline criteria. 

The ACW II Committee advises the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) on its ACWA Program. Since 1997, the ACW II Committee and its predecessor (the ACW I Committee) have followed the development of several alternative (to incineration) technologies for the demilitarization of assembled chemical weapons. In parallel with this modified baseline process report, the ACW II Committee is preparing a report to evaluate the two ACWA technologies being considered for Pueblo. 

The SCWO process is able to achieve destruction efficiencies for organic waste comparable with those attained by incineration technology, without the requirement of expensive dewatering equipment. The key to a successful SCWO process is a design that integrates various unit operations. Important design considerations include ... 

Zhao, Y.J., 2004. Present situation and its development tendency of MSW incinerated technologies in China. J. Qinghai Univ. (Chinese) 22, 25-28. 

The development of environmentally acceptable incineration technologies for the disposal of hazardous wastes is dependent on an understanding of the roles of (1) atomization or method of introduction of the waste materials, (2) evaporation and condensed-phase reactions of the waste droplets in the incinerator environment, (3) turbulent mixing in the incinerator, (4) kinetics of the thermal degradation and oxidation of the chemical species in question, and (5) heat transfer in the incinerator. 

DuPont response to committee questions about industrial best practices, September 26, 2006. The DuPont Sabine River Works facility practicing incineration technology is located in the state of Texas. 

Committee sources on data in lieu of trial bums included information from Melvin E. Keener, Executive Director of the CRWI, an industrial group representing 26 companies practicing incineration technology in the United States. 

Before any incinerator operations begin, an original, or baseline, HRA is conducted.16 This baseline is then updated upon completion of ATBs for each agent campaign. Only minor differences in risk estimates have been found between baseline HRAs and later updates based on actual emissions data. This is true for all four chemical agent disposal facilities using the Army s incineration technology. 

Rapid progress in incineration technology has been brought about in the field of solid waste disposal. With the aim of reducing solid wastes to render them harmless, great progress has been advanced due to the traditional priority placed on incineration in Japan. 

Fusaro, D., Incineration technology still hot, getting hotter, Chem. Proc., 54(6), 26,1991. 

The material intliis section is supplemented by material in a previous National Research Council report (NRC, 2007), which addressed four chemical agent disposal facihty sites in the continental United States that use incineration technology and one site that uses neutralization technology, all of them operated under the authority of the CMA. The regulatory requirements and the types of secondary wastes that will be generated at the two ACWA facilities being studied here are very similar to those at the CMA facilities. 

Incineration is a well-developed technology that has been shown to be effective for destroying stockpiled chemical weapons. At present, incineration is being used in Germany and the United Kingdom for destroying recovered chemical weapons. The U.S. Army and its contractors have developed very advanced and sophisticated incineration technology for the destruction of the U.S. chemical weapons stockpile. 

The EPP also described the local EPG environment where Project SWIFTSURE was to be conducted, the proposed incinerator technology and general environmental protection and safety measures. Some of these latter measures included ... 

---