Hazardous substances analysis

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authorizes control over hazardous and potentially hazardous substances and validates appropriate methods of analysis, many of which require GC/MS. 

The Environmental Protection Agency lays down strict guidelines for the analysis of a range of environmentally hazardous substances. Many of the analyses utilize GC/MS. 

EPA, FEMA and DOT, 1987, Technical Guidance for Hazards Analysis, Emergency Planning for Extremely Hazardous Substances, December. 

The task analysis is performed on tasks 2, 3, and 4. Tasks 1 and 5 were eliminated from the analysis because they did not involve any direct exposure to hazardous substances (from the initial screening analysis described in Section 2.1). The analysis considers operations 2.1 to 2.5, 3.1 to 3.2 and 4.1 to 4.5 in Figure 5.6. 

The primary objective is to develop an appropriate range of waste management options to be analyzed more fully in the detailed analysis phase of the FS.12 Appropriate waste management ensures the protection of human health and the environment. It may involve, depending on site-specific circumstances, complete elimination or destruction of hazardous substances at the site, significant reduction of concentrations of hazardous substances to acceptable health-based levels, and prevention of exposure to hazardous substances via engineering or institutional controls, or some combination of the above. 

In an attempt to quantify the global transport of hazardous substances that are connected to the e-waste flow, a substance flow analysis (SFA) has been performed. This includes different stages ... 

The SFA requires the definition of respective substances, a comprehensive analysis of the system (i.e. boundaries), and it is always limited in its extent due to process properties and data availability. Within this chapter the implementation of SFA for tracing hazardous substances in international informal e-waste treatment has been proved to be a useful method. To assess the hazardous consequences and potential risks of the selected chemicals to humans and the environment caused by informal recycling activities in those regions, different models exist, from which four have been chosen according to their specific focus and various pros and cons. 

Real- Time Analysis for Pollution Prevention Analytical methodologies need to be further developed to allow for real-time, in-process monitoring and control prior to the formation of hazardous substances. 

The ISO protocol for the biochemical response EROD (ISO 23893-2/AWI) as a recent example of a bioanalytical (biomarker) [49,50] method standardised under ISO for fish needs harmonisation with the other test systems and between the laboratories (users) before implementation. Use of biomarkers (biochemical responses) in multi-arrays for environmental monitoring according to Hansen et al. [50] is complementary to chemical analysis since they can alert for the presence of ecotoxic compounds. Bringing into the WFD, the effect-related approaches concerning bioassays and biomarkers are only relevant in the context of the QN of environmental relevant substances and the good chemical status. But it is rather difficult to transfer the monitored biochemical responses or biomarkers into an operational effect-related standard. They serve as the basis for environmental protection against hazardous substances. In relation to... 

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection uses the TXDS method of consequence analysis to estimate potentially catastrophic quantities of toxic substances, as required by the New Jersey Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act (TCPA). An acute toxic concentration (ATC) is defined as the concentration of a gas or vapor of a toxic substance that will result in acute health effects in the affected population and 1 fatality out of 20 or less (5% or more) during a 1-hr exposure. ATC values, as proposed by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, are estimated for 103 extraordinarily hazardous substances and are based on the lowest value of one of the following (1) the lowest reported lethal concentration (LCLO) value for animal test data, (2) the median lethal concentration (LC50) value from animal test data multiplied by 0.1, or (3) the IDLH value. 

The material factor MF for the process unit is taken of the most hazardous substance present, which lead to the analysis of the worst case that could actually occur. MF is a value, which denotes the intensity of energy release from the most hazardous material or mixture of materials present in significant quantity in the process. MF is obtained from the flammability and reactivity of the substances. The process is divided into units. The material factor is calculated for each unit separately. Dow (1987) has listed a number of chemical compounds and materials with their MF s. 

FIG. 23-27 Overall logic diagram for consequence analysis of volatile hazardous substances. (CCPS-AIChE, 1989, p. 60.)... 

The introduction of EU directives on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Reduction of Hazardous Substances has highlighted the need for precise and repeatable elemental analysis of heavy metals in the plastics production process. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy has emerged as the most economical and effective analytical tool for achieving this. A set of certified standards, known as TOXEL, is now available to facilitate XRF analyses in PE. Calibration with TOXEL standards is simplified by the fact that XRF is a multi-element technique. Therefore a single set of the new standards can be used to calibrate several heavy elements, covering concentrations from trace level to several hundred ppm. This case study is the analysis of heavy metals in PE using an Epsilon 5 XRF spectrometer. 

Spingarn NE, Northington DJ, Pressely T. 1982. Analysis of nonvolatile organic hazardous substances by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr Sci 20(12) 571-574. 

ARIP involves collecting questionnaire information from facilities that have had significant releases of hazardous substances, developing a national accidental release database, analyzing the collected information, and disseminating the results of the analysis to those involved in chemical accident prevention activities. ARIP also helps to focus industry s attention on the causes of accidental releases and the means to prevent them. The database is publicly available and covers incidents from 1986-1999. 

Angerer J, Schaller KH. 1988. Digestion procedures for the determination of metals in biological samples. In Analysis of hazardous substances in biological materials. Vol. 2. Weinheim, FRG VCH, 1-30. 

The waste classification system developed in this Report includes a general class of exempt waste. Waste in this class would contain sufficiently small amounts of hazardous substances that it could be managed in all respects as if it were nonhazardous (e.g., as household trash). NCRP intends that exempt materials could be used or disposed of in any manner allowed by laws and regulations addressing disposition of nonhazardous materials. However, exempt waste would not necessarily be exempt for purposes of beneficial use without further analysis of the risks associated with anticipated uses. Materials could be exempted for purposes of disposal or beneficial use based on similar considerations of acceptable risk. However, based on differences in exposure scenarios for the two dispositions, limits on the amounts of hazardous substances that could be present in exempt materials intended for beneficial use could be substantially lower than the limits for disposal as exempt waste. Thus, disposal may be the only allowable disposition for some exempt materials based on considerations of risk. In addition, some exempt materials may consist of trash, rubble, and residues from industrial processes that would have no beneficial uses and must be managed as waste. 

Introduction to Analysis. All previous examples involved waste in which radionuclides were assumed to be the only hazardous substances. However, the contaminants of concern in electric arc furnace dust include chemicals that induce stochastic and deterministic effects. Furthermore, the deterministic chemicals affect different organs, and some affect more than one organ. 

The application of green chemistry rules in the design of new analytical methods is the key to diminishing the adverse effects of analytical chemistry on the environment. The same ingenuity and innovation that were applied earlier to obtain excellent sensitivity, precision, and accuracy are now invoked to reduce or eliminate the application of hazardous substances in analysis. 

There is no universally accepted definition of "risk assessment." Some define it narrowly to mean only the identification of a hazardous substance. Others interpret it to mean the full range of activities, including the risk-benefit analysis and the economic considerations used to make a regulatory decision. 

For the terrestrial environment, waste sites may act as major emission sources of mixtures. In the United States, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) has performed a trend analysis to identify priority chemical mixtures associated with hazardous waste sites (De Rosa et al. 2001, 2004 Fay 2005). The information was extracted from the Hazardous Substance Release/Health Effects Database (HazDat) (ATSDR 1997). The HazDat contains data from hundreds of hazardous waste sites in the United States. A trend analysis was completed for frequently co-occurring chemicals in binary or ternary combinations found in air, water, and soil at or around hazardous waste sites (Fay and Mumtaz 1996 De Rosa et al. 2001, 2004). Table 1.1 gives an overview of frequently occurring substances at hazardous waste sites in the United States. 

Operators of facilities that are subject to the EPA s RMP must perform offsite consequence analyses to determine whether accidental releases from their processes could put nearby populations at risk. In performing a consequence analysis it is assumed that all or part of a hazardous substance escapes from a process at a given facility. It is then estimated how far downwind hazardous gas concentrations may extend. 

---