Hazard assessment steps involve

In this study detailed fault trees with probability and failure rate calculations were generated for the events (1) Fatality due to Explosion, Fire, Toxic Release or Asphyxiation at the Process Development Unit (PDU) Coal Gasification Process and (2) Loss of Availability of the PDU. The fault trees for the PDU were synthesized by Design Sciences, Inc., and then subjected to multiple reviews by Combustion Engineering. The steps involved in hazard identification and evaluation, fault tree generation, probability assessment, and design alteration are presented in the main body of this report. The fault trees, cut sets, failure rate data and unavailability calculations are included as attachments to this report. Although both safety and reliability trees have been constructed for the PDU, the verification and analysis of these trees were not completed as a result of the curtailment of the demonstration plant project. Certain items not completed for the PDU risk and reliability assessment are listed. 

Most human or environmental healtli hazards can be evaluated by dissecting tlie analysis into four parts liazard identification, dose-response assessment or hazard assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. For some perceived healtli liazards, tlie risk assessment might stop with tlie first step, liazard identification, if no adverse effect is identified or if an agency elects to take regulatory action witliout furtlier analysis. Regarding liazard identification, a hazard is defined as a toxic agent or a set of conditions that luis the potential to cause adverse effects to hmnan health or tlie environment. Healtli hazard identification involves an evaluation of various forms of information in order to identify the different liaz.ards. Dose-response or toxicity assessment is required in an overall assessment responses/cffects can vary widely since all chemicals and contaminants vary in their capacity to cause adverse effects. This step frequently requires that assumptions be made to relate... 

The first stage of the site characterization process is the customization of the generic plan developed as part of planning and preparation for responding to contamination threats. In general, the incident commander will develop the customized plan in conjunction with the site characterization team leader. The steps involved in the development of the plan include (1) perform an initial evaluation of information about the threat, (2) identify one or more investigation sites, (3) assess potential site hazards, (4) develop a sampling approach, and (5) assemble a site characterization team. 

Hazard assessment and exposure assessment of chemicals are generally common stages performed similarly independent of the chemical use category (industrial chemical, pesticide, biocide, food additive, food contact material, etc.). However, variation occurs in the way in which the exposure assessment and hazard assessment information are integrated in the risk characterization step, depending on the regulation involved and the goal of the risk assessment. This wdl be addressed in more detail in the next section. 

Risk assessment applies to all activities in the laboratory, including lifting heavy equipment and use of furnaces, for example, whether or not any hazardous substances are involved. The five basic steps in risk assessment are 1. Look for the hazards. 

The system consists of two parts. The first part involves using either available information from the drug development process or making reasonable speculations to characterize the potential hazards to the workforce from exposure to the compounds. The second step involves using that information to assess the risk of exposure and recommend controls that prevent exposure. There is more than one suitable control method that can control most exposure points, and several examples have been provided. Finally, case studies have been provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of some of these control methods. 

Risk assessment is an empirically based process that estimates the risk of adverse health effects from exposure of an individual or population to a chemical, physical, or biological agent or property. The health risk assessment process involves the following steps hazard identification, effects assessment (dose-response assessment), exposure assessment, and risk characterization (Van Leeuwen and Vermeire 2007). 

In the stepwise process, the risk evaluation combines the results of the second step, hazard evaluation, with any information on actual exposure possibilities, including evaluating exposure sources, levels, frequencies, types and routes. The assessment effort involves interpreting the field verified data from the perspective of determining what the actual risk level to humans and the environment is in the real world circumstances posed by the activity being evaluated. 

Risk characterization provides for both qualitative and quantitative descriptions of risk. The step involves integrating the results of the hazard identification, dose-response assessment, and exposure assessment to characterize risk. Often, a direct comparison between exposure criteria developed in the first two steps and the results of the exposure assessment (concentration in the environmental media or the estimated dose, as appropriate) provide a basis for determining whether risks are acceptable. Typically, if criteria are exceeded, the risk is not acceptable. What is defined as acceptable, as well as the way risk is expressed, is often a... 

As discussed in the previous problem set, the four major steps in a health risk assessment are hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. A health risk assessment initially involves the identification of human health effects attributed to exposure to a chemical, usually on a continuous basis. A dose-response assessment determines how different levels of exposure to a hazard or pollutant affect the likelihood or severity of the health effects. An exposure assessment determines the extent of human exposure. These are combined to provide a risk characterization value. 

Recently, a formalized hazard assessment procedure has been initiated for all processes to be run in the Pilot Plant. To date, the testing methodology has been found to be quite effective at identifying potential hazards. For the remainder of this paper, I will elaborate on this procedure, detail its step-by-step format as well as the responsibilities of the individuals involved. 

This procedure for safety investigations is often referred to as PHASE [7]. The acronym stands for Process Hazard Assessment and Safety Evaluation, and the procedure is shown graphically in Figure 2-1. It has to be performed for every process and each sub-step involved. It is even more important to repeat this procedure after each relevant process or plant modification. 

The next step involves risk assessment. Here one looks at the frequency or likelihood and severity of events involving the identified hazards. This includes event patterns, such as intermittent or continuous. 

The first step of a risk assessment is to determine the hazard category of the substances involved, the second step is to determine exposure via inhalation or skin and the third step involves combination of others into a risk category by the equation risk = hazard x exposure. 

A risk assessment involves careful examination of the hazards in a workplace and the factors involved in them, such as the type of hazard, the type of equipment, training and number of operations and existing systems in place in relation to control of the risk. In the assessment, the degree of risk associated with each hazard is decided based on the use of standards where available. The control step involves developing measures to reduce that risk. 

Most demonstrations have been conducted safely without incidents. However, almost every week across the nation there are reports of laboratory incidents, including demonstrations that go awry and injure students and/or teachers when proper safety precautions are not adequately employed. These incidents are often widely publicized and create concerns in communities near and far about the safety of students. They are often linked to failures to recognize hazards, assess the risks of hazards, and take steps to minimize the risks of hazards - the RAM part of RAMP. This section will review broadly the causes of incidents involving demonstrations and basic safety steps to implement so that demonstrations can be conducted safely. 

Risk Assessment— This step involves determining the risk presented by each identified hazard. Analysis must be performed to assess hazard likelihood and severity. This requires knowing and understanding the HCFs and hazard effects. 

A successful job hazard analysis ( HA) will involve collecting job data, developing the job steps and task, creating cause and effect diagram(s), the hazard assessment, and using a risk matrix to identify probability and severity... 

Capello and co-workers have also proposed a comprehensive framework for the environmental assessment of solvents (both single and mixture) [27]. The tool combines EHS analysis of potential solvent hazards with LCA results for environmental impact in a simple three-step procedure. First, a solvent is scored using the EHS method for nine effect categories. These include the potential for release, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, fire/explosion and reaction/decomposition, persistency, and air and water hazard. The second step involves application of LCA, as described above using the software tool Ecosolvent to calculate the impact scores for the solvent. Finally, the two assessment scores are combined and used to rate the solvents. 

The overall process involved in the evaluation and design of petrochemical plant buildings for explosion hazards is illustrated in Figure 1.1, This flowchart shows fifteen basic steps in the overall blast assessment and design process, as follows ... 

Hazard identification is the process of collecting and evaluating information on the effects of an agent on animal or human health and well-being. In most cases, this involves a careful assessment of the adverse effects and what is the most sensitive population. The dose-response assessment involves evaluation of the relationship between dose and adverse effect. Typically, an effort is made to determine the lowest dose or exposure at which an effect is observed. A comparison is often made between animal data and any human data that might be available. Next is exposure assessment, in which an evaluation of the likely exposure to any given population is assessed. Important parameters include the dose, duration, frequency, and route of exposure. The final step is risk characterization, in which all the above information is synthesized and a judgment made on what is an acceptable level of human exposure. In the simplest terms, risk is the product of two factors hazard and exposure (i.e. hazard x exposure = risk). In real risk assessments, all hazards may not be known and exposure is often difficult to quantify precisely. As a result, the calculated risk may not accurately reflect the real risk. The accuracy of a risk assessment is no better than the data and assumptions upon which it is based. 

---