Equipment exposure studies

A field operator exposure study was designed to accommodate the chemical properties and the use pattern involved in the treatment of potato crops for protection against the Colorado potato beetle. Fifteen farmworkers experienced in the use of tractor-drawn sprayers for application of crop protection materials to crops were selected. All were adult males. To avoid production of a large quantity of treated potato crop prior to registration of the product for sale, the trials were performed on stubble fields after harvest of winter wheat crops in a potato-growing area of southern Ontario. This allowed the use of typical farm spray equipment and a typical duration of exposure for a complete shift of work. 

Area samples may occasionally be deployed in locations requiring protection from weather and dirt contamination. In a recent study of heavy equipment operators exposure to diesel exhaust emission we had to support and protect instrumentation systems upon heavy earth moving equipment. Exposure to mechanical... 

Unit exposure values are derived from actual exposure studies where the same formulation types, equipment and methods were employed. In addition, the data can be subset to represent various clothing scenarios. The following scenarios are available ... 

This model has a straightforward structure aud is simple to use. It is based on exposure studies carried out for registration purposes. In addition, it has relatively small databases for two out of three formulations and for downward applications with tractor-mounted equipment. It covers the full range of the risk assessment process, i.e. dermal absorption and a comparison of estimated exposure and tolerable exposure. Exposure reduction coefficients are presented for several important exposure reduction measures. 

Assessments of motor function are often included in the neuropsychological test batteries utilized in occupational exposure studies. Typically, these tend to be relatively simple measures of motor capabilities, probably for two reasons. The first is that the inclusion of vigilance tasks such as those described previously depends on motor coordination in addition to sensory capabilities therefore, toxicant-induced changes in such performances may already be indicative of motor impairment. This can then be pursued by inclusion of some additional and more direct assessments of motor function in the battery. The second reason relates to logistical reasons and practicalities. Test batteries such as the WHO Neurobehavioral Core Test Battery and the NFS are typically taken to the site where measurements of subjects are to be made. Thus, portability is a major consideration, and more complex assessments of motor function would incur greater equipment needs. Since the purpose of these batteries is generally to screen for adverse effects, studies providing more precise delineations of affected functions can be pursued at a later time. 

Exposures to ethyl acrylate monomer are most likely to occur in an occupational environment via skin contact and inhalation. However, the closed systems used during manufacture and transportation will limit worker exposures to those that may occur during routine process maintenance, periodic plumbing leaks, and the collection of quality control samples. Under these conditions, exposures are further limited by the use of industrial hygiene controls and personal protective equipment. The acrid odor of ethyl acrylate, which can be detected at 0.001-0.005 ppm, also serves to limit exposure. Studies of monomer production workers have indicated that... 

Fugitive emissions and fugitive dusts can be measured with a personal monitor or high-volume filter equipment when studying internal emission sources. Working methods and personal practices are, however, the most important factors that affect occupational lead exposure, and all personnel involved in lead operations must be trained adequately in lead abatement strategies and informed of the results of observations and monitoring, whether a cause for concern or not. 

The herbicide paraquat (l,l -dimethyl-4,4 -bipyridinium ion) is used widely in vegetation control programs. It is estimated that paraquat has been used in the United States on 10-12 million acres annually and is registered on 63 crops. Recommended rates vary from 0.25 to 1.5 Ib/acre. Human exposure should be limited during application, due to the toxic nature of paraquat. Most worker exposure studies (1-3) have addressed the issue of occupational body burden idien engaged in paraquat application with conventional spray equipment. Precautions taken to reduce respiratory and dermal routes of entry substantially lower the risk of potential adverse health effects. 

Safety considerations for magnetic resonance (mr) experiments have received Htde attention except for the problems associated with the use of electronic devices such as pacemakers in the magnetic field. However, in a 1990 study of reproductive health involving more than 1900 women working in clinical mr facihties in the United States no substantial differences were reported between the group of women directly involved with mr equipment (280 individuals) and other working women (894 individuals) (10). Conclusions are restricted to exposure to the static external field. 

Polymers. Studies to determine possible exposure of workers to residual epichl orohydrin and ethylene oxide monomers in the polymers have been done. Tests of warehouse air where Hydrin H and Hydrin C are stored showed epichl orohydrin levels below 0.5 ppm. Air samples taken above laboratory mixing equipment (Banbury mixer and 6" x 12" mill) when compounds of Hydrin H or C were mixed gave epichl orohydrin levels below detectable limits, and ethylene oxide levels less than 0.2 ppm, well below permissible exposure limits (46). A subacute vapor inhalation toxicity study in which animals were exposed to emission products from compounded Parel 58 suggests that no significant health effects would be expected in workers periodically exposed to these vapors (47). 

The primary limitation of a HAZOP study is the length of time required to perform it. Because the study is designed to provide a complete analysis, study sessions can be intensive and lii ing. HAZOP studies typically do not look at occupational hazards (e.g., electrical equipment, rotating equipment, hot surfaces) or chronic hazards (e.g., chronic chemical exposure, noise, heat stress). For experience with HAZOP see Swann (1995). 

Failure rates are computed by dividing the total number of failures for the equipment population under study by the equipment s total exposure hours (for time-related rates) or by the total demands upon the equipment (for demand-related rates). In plant operations, there are a large number of unmeasured and varying influences on both numerator and denominator throughout the study period or during data processing. Accordingly, a statistical approach is necessary to develop failure rates that represent the true values. 

The first DNA preparations in this part of the study was PCR product - DNA of Chlamydia trachomatis 17 > bp), in the presence of a smaller by molecular mass internal control of human DNA. After migration the gel was exposured for 5, 30, 300 and 600 seconds by transilluminator Vilber Lourmat, equipped with 6 UV lamps with irradiance W = 0,24 W/m2 and 254 nm filter. The degree of structural integrity loss of amplificated DNA was evaluated by the decrease of brightness intensity of the of the bands processed by using the tools of "ImageJ" computer program. 

Based on the patch method to assess worker or re-entry exposure, researchers have developed a database, which may be used to estimate exposure. Each patch from an individual in a study can be entered into the database separately, the residue data from patches from various body areas can be summed to yield a whole-body exposure number, and the data may be sorted as to worker tasks, equipment used, protective clothing worn, formulation types and other parameters. This is the basis for the currently used Pesticide Handlers Data Base (PHED), which was developed through a joint effort in the 1980s of CropLife America [formerly known as American Crop Protection Association (ACPA) and National Agricultural Chemicals Association (NACA)], the Environmental Protection Agency (ERA) and Health Canada. " The PHED is discussed in detail in another article in this book. 

One of the most important aspects of designing a successful worker exposure or re-entry study is the selection of the agricultural site at which to perform the study. One must first define the growing region in which the pesticide is to be used to the widest extent possible. This is important since this region would have the most farms, farmers, commercial applicators, or re-entry workers which would have work habits, equipment, and land, which would best represent the use of the product. 

---