Work habits

Injection—The injection of hazardous materials into the body sounds, at first, like a bad joke. Who in his right mind would inject themselves—exp>ecially when it is not required by a doctor However, it can occur by stepping on or bumping against a sheup object while working at an incident site. It will happen before you even realize it has occurred and the reality of possible being internally contaminated sinks in. The best precaution for this eventuality is to have on protective clothing and observe safe work habits. 

Make sure your company s short-term objectives (e.g., updating aii P IDs) are consistent with broader PSM goais (e.g., accurate process safety information), sind communicate them in ways that clearly encourage work habits and procedures that support PSM performance. For exampie, your employees need to understand that the company will achieve its goal of reducing reportable incidents by changing its PSM procedures, not its reporting processes. 

Communications should be two-way, incorporating mechanisms (e.g., questionnaires, response cards, callback numbers, etc.) for soliciting feedback from the people receiving information. This is particularly true of communications that support initiatives like PSM that require cooperation and may require changes in working habits. 

Dirt is one of the biggest culprits in the demise of bearings. Dirt makes its appearance in bearings in many subtle ways and it can be introduced by bad work habits. It also can be introduced through lubricants that have been exposed to dirt, which is responsible for approximately half of bearing failures throughout the industry. 

There is often work in a laboratory for which no previous training or experience is needed. For these entry level jobs, the laboratory operator will be the instructor. Even people with experience in other laboratories, though, will need some training in the specific aspects of a new job. Sometimes poor work habits will have to be corrected. More details on training will be found in the chapters on laboratory records and safety. 

One of the most important aspects of designing a successful worker exposure or re-entry study is the selection of the agricultural site at which to perform the study. One must first define the growing region in which the pesticide is to be used to the widest extent possible. This is important since this region would have the most farms, farmers, commercial applicators, or re-entry workers which would have work habits, equipment, and land, which would best represent the use of the product. 

When planning a worker exposure/re-entry study, the number of sites selected should reflect the use pattern of the product. Usually three different sites, each in a different geographical location, are recommended to ensure good representation of the areas when the product has wide use. The different geographical locations offer the researcher diversity in equipment used to treat the crops as well as diversity in the work habits of the individuals in the study. 

Four of the 15 operators had exceptional exposure compared to the other 11 which reveals improper use of protective gloves and/or handling contaminated surfaces with bare hands. The same four operators had high exposure on other areas and much lower safety factors which shows a clear link between poor work habits and higher exposure. The pattern of exposure confirms that direct contact with spray mixture on contaminated surfaces is the main route of exposure when using product in water-soluble bags. 

Generally speaking, the equipment that workers use and the type of agricultural work performed while handling pesticides or pesticide-treated commodities have a major impact on the level of exposure a worker receives. Neat work habits generally lead to lower exposure for agricultural workers who handle pesticides. The current Pesticide Handlers Exposure Database (PHED), which is used to predict exposure to mixers/loaders/applicators, is based on this concept. 

By working with giant vesicles, the chemist acquires the working habits of a cell biologist, suffering, however, from being obliged to work with only one... 

The content of this book also reflects the profound changes in laboratory work habits that result, among other things, in the evolution of material, in the use of computers and in the growing demand for chemical analysis. 

Symmetry establishes a ridiculous and wonderful oousinship between objects, phenomena, and theories outwardly unrelated terrestial magnetism, women s veils, polarized light, natural selection, the theory of groups, invariants and transformations, the work habits of bees in the hive, the structure of space, vase designs, quantum physics, scarabs, flower petals,... 

Insect and dust exclusion from bottling room Sanitary design in equipment and floors Bottling room personnel cleanliness and work habits Container capacities Fill point variation... 

Temperature and humidity inside warehouse Cork finish bottles stored with the cork pointed down Work habits of fork lift operators Stock rotation by chronology of bottling date Bottled goods library... 

Sanitary Design. Pipelines and equipment should be easy to clean and sterilize. Clean-in-place systems are recommended wherever possible. Use signs to constantly remind personnel about personal cleanliness and work habits. 

Work Habits. Neatness in pallet rows facilitates a smooth operation as well as minimizing physical damage (fork lift blight) to cartons. 

Protection requires a combination of approaches. There are a number of factors that are intrinsic to the physiological and psychological makeup of the worker. Individual susceptibility and interaction with other biological stresses will vary from individual to individual. Personal hygiene and work habits also vary. It is important that the worker fully comprehends the nature of the hazards and the consequences of careless actions or failure to follow prescribed safe procedures. The attitudes of workers and managers are important in implementing working practices that will minimize risks. 

The use of protective clothing, the observation of operational and regulatory guidelines and the observation of good work habits contribute to safe pesticide application. Access to regular trained medical advice and examination is also important. 

The following review summarizes the findings in all reported studies on excretion of 2,1+,5-T by humans given oral doses, or exposed to the herbicide under normal field conditions, including careless work habits. 

The patterns of excretion were similar for the two people in each couple (Figure l), with the lower dose in the female, even on a hody weight basis. The second pair received somewhat less than the first pair, possibly due to more careful work habits. Wearing of contaminated clothing between sprayings might account for the increased excretion observed in these two male workers (Nos. 2 and 1+) at the end of the first spray period. 

Three of the four men took part in preparing the sprays from the herbicide concentrates. They wore jeans and shirts, with rubber boots or leather shoes and leggings. However, they had bad work habits, contrary to advice and recommendations outlined in the publication "Pesticides" published by the Council of Europe (2k). They wore the same clothes all week as they had worn the week before doing the same work. Two of them lived in a house trailer in the spray area and took their rest periods in the trailer where the odor of the herbicide was noted. All were smokers and smoked during the day without washing their hands. 

Differences did, however, occur in relation to work duties within crews (Table III). Totals per exposure ranged from a high of 0.096 mg/kg (mixer) to a low of 0.001 mg/kg (flagmen). With one exception the mixer in each of the four crews showed higher exposure levels than any of his fellow crew members. These three mixers also had higher 2,4,5-T excretion values on day 0 than others in their crew probably because they mixed the 2,4,5-T the day before the actual spray occurred. Optimum preexposure data would have required the mixers to begin urine collection at least 1 day earlier. The fact that the one exceptional mixer endorsed cautious work habits and wore gloves may account for the comparatively low level of 2,4,5-T measured in his urine. 

One of the most important habits to develop in the darkroom is consistency. Having achieved satisfactory results you should be able to repeat them, alter them, and then return to the first result should it become necessary In addition to being consistent in your work habits it is important to set and practice standard procedures whenever possible. This will further facilitate the ultimate goal to produce a perfect print. 

---