Continuous improvement cycle

These performance objectives will then be reviewed at the agreed times, with each level of staff and modified, depending on the results, with new objectives added as appropriate. This is a continuous improvement cycle. 

This methodology, known as the continuous improvement cycle, is shown schematically in Figure B16. 

A diagram of the quality planning process is shown in Fig. 4. This planning process represents the first four steps in the continuous improvement cycle (Fig. 5), discussed in the section The Quality Improvement Process. ... 

The link between quality planning and quality improvement is execution. The continuous improvement cycle (Fig. 5) starts with benchmarking and internal assessment to arrive at a gap analysis. From the gap analysis an action plan with assigned leadership, resources, timelines, and metrics is developed. From this quality plan, the plant s human resources must successfully execute the plan for improvement to occur. It is the leadership s responsibility to assure that the plan is do-able, appropriate and adequate resources are assigned, and that the culture of the plant supports change. This starts with the project leaders who must have not only the technical skills, but also the project... 

Both of these ISO management systems use the Plan, Do, Check, Act methodology. This common methodology is sometimes referred to as a continuous improvement cycle. Its steps are ... 

Despite all of these publications, there is still not a comprehensive resource to explain the need for an OCM program and, if so, how to implement such a program. This publication intends to fill that gap and further the continuous improvement cycle which is the hallmark of a good PSM program. 

The writers of ANSI7AIHA ZlO-2005, the Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS) Standard, emphasized that the OHSMS continual improvement cycle [is] based on the recognized quality concept of Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA). A depiction of the PDCA concept appears at the beginning of each of the Scope, Purpose, Application, and Definitions sections. Figure 1 duplicates that depiction. 

The continuous improvement cycle, which is fundamental to the heart of QM, is conceptualfy the same as the risk management process. The two models can be compared as follows ... 

The model is organized as a cycle and is meant to mimic the idea of continuous improvement cycle, leading to self-learning and self-improving agile organization. 

The process of identifying hazards in the working interface, measuring the frequency of their occurrence, and recognizing safety barriers and solutions constitutes a continuous improvement cycle for safety that creates a positive safety climate and drives cultural improvement. This process isolates specific behaviors to target for improvement. It also provides a common language for safety and stimulates both horizontal and vertical communication about important safety issues. 

Risk-based orientation Regulatory scrutiny based on the level of scientific understanding Mechanistic basis for understanding failure modes and variability Sources of variability and risk to quality Drive out fear Continuous improvement— Change control and life cycle management... 

As discussed in section Continuous Improvement—Change Control and Life Cycle Management. Change towards continuous improvement should be encouraged. Quality by design and process understanding can... 

Life cycle management and change control provide a mechanism for continuous improvement. To support continuous improvement through change control a quality system would need to be based on principles of manufacturing science and risk-management. The proposed ICH QIO guidance is an opportunity to accomplish this task. 

The QMS and the processes that comprise it must be custom designed for the needs of the business. One size does not fit all situations. The requirements of an enterprise vary across sites and the phases of a product life cycle. A comprehensive system will ensure a holistic programmatic approach in its support to the enterprise. This does not mean that every phase of the product life cycle (discovery, development, commercial manufacturing) will utilize all the processes that comprise the system. Nor does it require that all commercial manufacturing sites will necessarily implement all processes. It does, however, provide a common platform and expectation for all processes, owners, metrics review programs, continuous improvement efforts, and the like when they are implemented. 

The final section in the process is describing the conclusions, implications, and recommendations that the team reached after examining the results. Since this is the bottom line of the process, it is important that this section be understandable to those outside the CQI team. This section should concisely explain the conclusions and detail the actions that need to take place. The CQI process is iterative thus the team s recommendations for this CQI cycle and for the next CQI cycle m ust be included (Leape et al., 1998c). This will be good news to pharmacist Pat. Because CQI is a continuous improvement process, an understanding of the iterative nature of the process will take the pressure off him to fix all pharmacy system problems at once. 

On the defensive side, service requirements were promulgated for a real-time detector for nerve agents in the field, shipboard detectors for Royal Navy vessels, prophylactics and therapy for nerve agent poisoning and a new respirator. The procurement cycle for some of these items was relatively quick, but for others, in particular the respirator, the process was one of continuous improvement reflecting advances in science and technology. However, to try to provide a succinct analysis of the first 20 post-war years of chemical weapon development in Britain is difficult mainly because many topics cannot be reported due to the non-disclosure of sensitive documents by the British government. 

As an example, if the hot temperature is 1273 K (1000 °C) and the cold temperature 373 K (100 °C) then the efficiency is approximately 70%. In practice the operation of a real engine does not follow the Carnot cycle and the efficiency is considerably lower. For a medium sized motor car with an internal combustion engine the fuel efficiency is about 12%, much of the wasted 88% demanding water cooling. There are continuous improvements made in petrol and diesel engine technologies and in the fuels and projections suggest that thermal efficiencies a little over 50% will eventually be achieved. 

VECAP has seen significant successes and was subsequently implemented in five other European Member States, North America, Japan, and other parts of Asia. It has expanded to reduce release potential of other flame-retardants to the environment, including phosphorus flame-retardants. This program is not only a flame-retardant program it is a model program for all polymer additives. Companies participating in VECAP follow a cycle of continuous improvement. This starts with a commitment to the Code of Good Practice and verification of the actual... 

---