Classification health hazards

Health and Safety Factors. Handling of cyanoacetic acid and cyanoacetates do not present any specific danger or health hazard if handled with the usual precautions. Cyanoacetic acid is classified as a moderate irritant (skin irritation, rabbits) and has an LD q (oral, rats) of 1500 mg/kg. Methyl and ethyl cyanoacetate are both classified as slight irritants (skin irritation, rabbits) and have an LD q (oral, rats) of 3062 and 2820 mg/kg, respectively. Transport classification cyanoacetic acid RID/ADR 8 IMDG-Code 8 lATA/ICAO 6.1. Methyl and ethyl cyanoacetate RID/ADR 6.1 IMDG-Code 6.1 lATA/ICAO 6.1. 

Greim H (ed) Occupational Toxicants, Vol 13, critical data evaluation for MAK values and classification of carcinogens. Commission for the investigation of health hazards of chemical compounds in the work area, Bisphenol A, p 49. New York, VCH, 1999... 

In accordance with both the old and the new European classification system teratogenic effects constitute a health hazard but a separate classification for teratogenicity is not provided. Instead, teratogens are classified as developmental toxicants, with developmental toxicity falling within the hazard class of reproductive toxicity. 

In the chemical safety report, the hazard assessment of a particular substance is based on the data set provided in the technical dossier. This contains substance-specific information on physicochemical properties as well as on toxicological and ecotoxicological hazards. One objective of the hazard assessment is the substance s hazard identification, which comprises the determination of its physicochemical and hazardous properties for the purpose of classification. Concerning human health hazards, both human and nonhuman information is taken into consideration and evaluated with respect to the classification criteria laid down in the Dangerous Substances Directive and in the CLP Regulation, respectively. However, in most cases human data do not exist, so the hazard identification has to be based on data from animal experiments. With respect to teratogenicity, this hazardous property may in principle be detected in the following toxicity studies ... 

The basic idea of the CLH process is the transfer of responsibility for classification and labeling from industrial companies to authorities on a European Community level. In case of active substances in biocidal or plant protection products, all intrinsic properties including physicochemical properties, human health hazards, and environmental hazards are subject to the harmonization. By contrast, in the case of chemicals which are used in other application fields only some specific hazard classes are considered in the CLH procedure. According to Article 36 of the CLP Regulation, these are respiratory sensitization, carcinogenicity, germ cell mutagenicity, and reproductive toxicity. Consequently, these provisions have... 

Abstract The present paper discusses classification of nano-objects, which is based on their size, morphology and chemical nature. The subject of nanochemistry includes those nano-objects whose chemical properties depend on size and morphology, such as spheroidal molecules, anisotropic (2D) and isotropic (ID) nanoparticles, nano-clusters and nanophases. Nanophase is a nano-dimensional part of the microphase whose properties depend on its size. The potential health hazards of nano-objects are associated with their capability of penetrating the body through inhalation, digestion or the skin. 

Chemical Name Synonyms Hazard Classification Health (Blue) Flammability (Red) Reactivity (Yellow) Special (White)... 

Second, waste that contains hazardous substances is classified based on considerations of health risks to the public that arise from waste disposal. The existing classification systems for radioactive and chemical wastes in the United States are not based primarily on considerations of health risks to the public. Rather, classification of hazardous wastes has been based primarily on the source of the waste or the presence of particular hazardous substances. The absence of risk-based waste classifications has had a number of undesirable ramifications ... 

Over the last several decades, separate classification systems have been developed for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes based on a variety of considerations, the most prevalent being the source of the waste. These classification systems have served their intended purpose of facilitating development of health-protective strategies for waste management and disposal reasonably well. However, they have exhibited a number of shortcomings and undesirable ramifications, which indicate that a new approach to classification of hazardous wastes would be beneficial. 

The primary purpose of this Report is to present NCRP s recommendations on classification of hazardous wastes. The Report is directed at a multidisciplinary audience with different levels of technical understanding in the fields of radiation and chemical risk assessment and radioactive and chemical waste management. Anew hazardous waste classification system is proposed that differs from the existing classification systems for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes in two fundamental respects. First, hazardous waste would be classified based on considerations of health risks to the public that arise from disposal of waste. Hazardous waste would not be classified based, for example, on its source. Second, the classification system would apply to any hazardous waste, and separate classification systems for radioactive and hazardous chemical wastes would not be retained. In the proposed system, waste would be classified based only on its properties, and the same rules would apply in classifying all hazardous wastes. 

The most appropriate primary basis for classification of hazardous waste is the risk to human health posed by waste. Furthermore, the health risks of primary concern in classifying hazardous wastes are risks to the public that arise from waste disposal, since permanent disposal is the intended disposition of most waste materials having no further use to their present custodian. 

CHRIS Chemical Hazard Information System 1,016 substances U.S. COAST GUARD Information on labeling, physical and chemical properties, health hazards, fire hazards, chemical reactivity, water pollution, and hazard classification... 

Mechanism of health hazards evaluation and classification Language of communication and transmission of information Crisis management system... 

Acute dermal toxicity is the study of adverse effects occurring within a short time of dermal application of a single-dose test chemical. In evaluating the safety of a chemical, determination of acute dermal toxicity is useful when exposure by the dermal route is likely and more predominant. It provides information on health hazards likely to arise from short-term exposure by the dermal route. Data from an acute dermal toxicity study may serve as a basis for chemical classification and labeling. It is an initial step in establishing a dose regimen in subchronic (and other) studies, and may provide information on dermal absorption as well as a chemical s mode of toxic action. 

Classification and Labelling of Surfactants for Human Health Hazards According to the Dangerous Substances Directive. CESIO Report, January 2000. 

There are three main categories of hazards namely, fire and explosion hazards, health hazards and environmental hazards. Different evaluation methods exist for each category. Not being experts in every evaluation method, the authors will refer only to the evaluation methods which are generally used. Evaluation methods according to the U.N. classification system, which covers a wide range of hazardous materials, are explained. 

For classification purposes, reliable epidemiological data and experience on the effects of chemicals on humans (e.g. occupational data, data from accident databases) should be taken into account in the evaluation of human health hazards of a chemical. Testing on humans solely for hazard identification purposes is generally not acceptable. 

An SDS should be produced for all substances and mixtures which meet the harmonized criteria for physical, health or environmental hazards under the GHS and for all mixtures which contain substances that meet the criteria for carcinogenic, toxic to reproduction or specific target organ systemic toxicity in concentrations exceeding the cut-off limits for SDS specified by the criteria for mixtures (see 1.5.3.1). The competent authority may choose also to require SDS s for mixtures not meeting the criteria for classification as hazardous but which contain hazardous substances in certain concentrations (see 1.5.3.1). 

As noted in the Classification of hazardous substances and mixtures (see Chapter 1.3), there may be some cases when the available hazard data may justify classification on the basis of other cut-off values/concentration limits than the generic ones specified in the health and environment hazard class chapters (Chapters 3.2 to 3.10 and 4.1). When such specific cut-off values are used for classification, they should also apply to the obligation to compile an SDS. 

The hazard classification should lead directly to labelling of acute health effects, environmental and physical hazards. The labelling approach that involves a risk assessment should only be applied to chronic health hazards, e.g. carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, or target organ systemic toxicity based on repeated exposure. The only chemicals it may be applied to are those in the consumer product setting where consumer exposures are generally limited in quantity and duration ... 

The following classification proposal draws on the GHS criteria. The document includes both brief statements about the proposal for each health hazard class and details of all the available scientific evidence. 

---