Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Chemical recovery methods

Chemical recovery ia sodium-based sulfite pulpiag is more complicated, and a large number of processes have been proposed. The most common process iavolves liquor iaciaeration under reduciag conditions to give a smelt, which is dissolved to produce a kraft-type green liquor. Sulfide is stripped from the liquor as H2S after the pH is lowered by CO2. The H2S is oxidized to sulfur ia a separate stream by reaction with SO2, and the sulfur is subsequendy burned to reform SO2. Alternatively, ia a pyrolysis process such as SCA-Bidemd, the H2S gas is burned direcdy to SO2. A rather novel approach is the Sonoco process, ia which alumina is added to the spent liquors which are then burned ia a kiln to form sodium aluminate. In anther method, used particulady ia neutral sulfite semichemical processes, fluidized-bed combustion is employed to give a mixture of sodium carbonate and sodium sulfate, which can be sold to kraft mills as makeup chemical. [Pg.274]

Secondary recovery, infill drilling, various pumping techniques, and workover actions may still leave oil, sometimes the majority of the oil, in the reservoir. There are further applications of technology to extract the oil that can be utilized if the economics justifies them. These more elaborate procedures are called enhanced oil recovery. They fall into three general categories thermal recoveiy, chemical processes, and miscible methods. All involve injections of some substance into the reservoir. Thermal recovery methods inject steam or hot water m order to improve the mobility of the oil. They work best for heavy nils. In one version the production crew maintains steam or hot water injection continuously in order to displace the oil toward the production wells. In another version, called steam soak or huff and puff, the crew injects steam for a time into a production well and then lets it soak while the heat from the steam transfers to the resei voir. After a period of a week or more, the crew reopens the well and produces the heated oil. This sequence can be repeated as long as it is effective. [Pg.926]

Most of the increase in the estimate from applying advanced technology comes from improvements in chemical flooding methods. The projections assume that crude oil has a nominal price of 30 per barrel and that the minimum rate of return on capital is 10 percent. Reprinted with permission from Enhanced Oil Recovery. Copyright 1984 by the National Petroleum Council. [Pg.99]

Because of the instability of many of the compounds involved, it is necessary to determine the chemical recoveries in all cases. This requires the use of macro quantities (10 mg up to several hundred mg) of carriers and target compounds. This, in turn, makes it impractical to use the various thin-layer methods, such as paper and thin-layer chromatography and paper electrophoresis, although such methods have proved useful in identifying products and in checking the purity of fractions. The separation methods now most commonly used are column chromatography and sublimation. [Pg.89]

Micellar flooding is a promising tertiary oil-recovery method, perhaps the only method that has been shown to be successful in the field for depleted light oil reservoirs. As a tertiary recovery method, the micellar flooding process has desirable features of several chemical methods (e.g., miscible-type displacement) and is less susceptible to some of the drawbacks of chemical methods, such as adsorption. It has been shown that a suitable preflush can considerably curtail the surfactant loss to the rock matrix. In addition, the use of multiple micellar solutions, selected on the basis of phase behavior, can increase oil recovery with respect to the amount of surfactant, in comparison with a single solution. Laboratory tests showed that oil recovery-to-slug volume ratios as high as 15 can be achieved [439]. [Pg.200]

The state of the art in chemical oil recovery has been reviewed [1732]. More than two thirds of the original oil remains unrecovered in an oil reservoir after primary and secondary recovery methods have been exhausted. Many chemically based oil-recovery methods have been proposed and tested in the laboratory and field. Indeed, chemical oil-recovery methods offer a real challenge in view of their success in the laboratory and lack of success in the field. The problem lies in the inadequacy of laboratory experiments and the limited knowledge of reservoir characteristics. Field test performances of polymer, alkaline, and micellar flooding methods have been examined for nearly 50 field tests. The oil-recovery performance of micellar floods is the highest, followed by polymer floods. Alkaline floods have been largely unsuccessful. The reasons underlying success or failure are examined in the literature [1732]. [Pg.203]

The interfacial tension plays an important role in the success of enhanced oil-recovery methods. An additional complication arises when the components undergo a chemical reaction or change. [Pg.224]

The interfacial rheologic properties are extremely sensitive parameters toward the chemical composition of immiscible formation liquids [1053]. Therefore comparison and interpretation of the interfacial rheologic properties may contribute significantly to extension of the spectrum of the reservoir characterization, better understanding of the displacement mechanism, development of more profitable enhanced and improved oil-recovery methods, intensification of the surface technologies, optimization of the pipe line transportation, and improvement of the refinery operations [1056]. [Pg.224]

Carbon dioxide flooding is the most promising enhanced oil-recovery method. To overcome the tendency of CO2 to bypass the smaller pores containing residual oil, one approach is to plug the larger pores by chemical precipitation. Several relatively inexpensive water-soluble salts of the earth alkali group react with CO2 to form a precipitate. [Pg.229]

S. Thomas and Ali. S. M. Farouq. Status and assessment of chemical oil recovery methods. Energy Sources, 21(1-2) 177-189, January-March 1999. [Pg.468]

In most alpha and mass spectrometric methods for which sample preparation is extensive and chemical recoveries can vary considerably from sample to sample, precise elemental concentrations are determined by isotope dilution methods (e.g., Faure 1977). This method is based on the determination of the isotopic composition of an element in a mixture of a known quantity of a tracer with an unknown quantity of the normal element. The tracer is a solution containing a known concentration of a particular element or elements for which isotopic composition has been changed by enrichment of one or more of its isotopes. [Pg.26]

Mimura, T., Simayoshi, H., Suda, T., Iijima, M., and Mituoka, S. Development of energy saving technology for flue gas carbon dioxide recovery in power plants by chemical absorption method and steam system, Energ. Corners, and Manag., 38(Suppl.), S57-S62, 1997. [Pg.600]

In contrast to the protein recovery methods discussed above, protein purification is still based predominantly on laboratory-developed procedures that are often not directly scalable because of the high costs of the chemicals employed, the difficulties... [Pg.285]

Chemical Recovery Cartridge Metallic Replacement Method... [Pg.115]

In this method, a metal (usually iron) in a chemical recovery cartridge (CRC) reacts with the silver thiosulfate in the spent fixer and goes into solution. The less active metal (silver) settles out as a solid. To bring the silver into contact with the iron, the spent fixer is passed through the CRC container, which is filled with steel wool. The steel wool provides the source of iron to replace the silver. The main advantages of this CRC method are the very low initial cost (cartridges cost about US 60) and the simplicity of installation only a few simple plumbing connections (shown in Fig. 2) are required. [Pg.115]

Figure 6 illustrates a combined system involving the use of both the electrolytic cell and the in situ ion-exchange unit. The combined system (Fig. 6) produces an excellent effluent with lower residual silver in comparison with the chemical recovery cartridge method (Fig. 2), electrolytic silver recovery method (Fig. 3), the conventional ion-exchange method (Fig. 4), and... [Pg.118]

However, the company s wastewater volume was actually very low, and chemical recovery cartridges, hydroxide precipitation tanks, and sulfide precipitation tanks became reasonable choices for silver recovery. Chemical recovery cartridges and the two types of precipitation tanks were all very simple to install. The costs for purchasing, installing, operating, and monitoring this equipment are very low compared with other methods. [Pg.121]

In comparison with the silver recovery/removal efficiencies of the chemical recovery cartridge (CRC) method, the hydroxide precipitation method, and the sulfide precipitation method shown in Table 6, the two precipitation methods appeared to be a better choice than the CRC method. [Pg.121]

The lack of satisfactory solvent recovery methods prior to 1930 prevented the use of selective solvents more suitable for lubricating oils. The major part of any solvent extraction plant is its complex solvent recovery system. Chemical engineering s contributions to distillation theory and process design resulted in the development of efficient solvent recovery techniques. In 1933, as illustrated by Figure 3, large commercial plants were... [Pg.181]

Future Use of the Parfait Method. The object of this study was to understand the behavior of a broad range of chemical types in this recovery method. On the basis of this evaluation and similar work with other recovery methods, a synthesis of methods is to be proposed that would provide a comprehensive recovery of chemical contaminants in water. [Pg.517]

Stewart, T. L., and J. N. Hartley. 1985. Evaluation of Improved Chemical Waste Disposal and Recovery Methods for N Reactor Fuel Fabrication Operations 1984 Annual Report. PNL-5294 and UNI-3204, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. [Pg.319]

Additional factors that may affect the reliability of the chemical scoring methods lie with the inherent difficulties of amino acid analysis. The analytical procedure for amino acid analysis can affect both the recovery and reliable quantitation of amino acids. Proteins must first be hydrolyzed to amino acids before analysis. Hydrolysis methods affect the amino acid recovery. Cystine, methionine, tryptophan, threonine, serine, and tyrosinecan bedestroyed during hydrolysis. Valine and isoleucine are released slowly and may not be completely... [Pg.134]

Ohtsuka et al. used UTEVA-Resin to set up a Pu analysis method, taking advantage of the ability to retain Pu in the Pu(IV) state, wash away other trivalents, and then selectively reduce and elute the Pu as Pu(III), thus separating it from still-retained U.58 59 Samples were loaded and washed in 3 M HN03, and Pu(III) was released with 0.01 M ascorbic acid in 3 M HN03. Ascorbic acid provides rapid reduction and is destroyed in the ICP-MS torch. A decontamination factor of 6 to 7 orders of magnitude was estimated for the Pu-U separation. After Pu elution, U could be removed in dilute nitric acid. Chemical recovery of Pu was 70% in the analysis of several sediment reference samples. These authors used the PrepLab system set up as shown in Figure 9.18. [Pg.547]

Sill et al. [26] have discussed a spectrometric method for the determination of americium and other alpha-emitting nuclides, including curium and californium, in potassium fluoride-pyrosulfate extracts of soils. Sekine [27] used a-spectrometry to determine americium in soils with a chemical recovery of 60-70%. Joshi [28] and Livens et al. [29] have discussed methods for the determination of241 americium in soils. [Pg.82]

Sekine et al. [27] used a-spectrometry to determine plutonium (and americium) in soil. The chemical recovery of plutonium was 51-99% and averaged 81%, while for americium the recovery was 60-70%. The method is coupled with the liquid-liquid extraction stage, taking about two days less than the ion exchange method a complete analysis takes about one week. [Pg.83]


See other pages where Chemical recovery methods is mentioned: [Pg.275]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.201]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.49 , Pg.50 , Pg.51 ]




SEARCH



Recovery methods

© 2024 chempedia.info