Proteins recovery

Membrane-retained components are collectively called concentrate or retentate. Materials permeating the membrane are called filtrate, ultrafiltrate, or permeate. It is the objective of ultrafiltration to recover or concentrate particular species in the retentate (eg, latex concentration, pigment recovery, protein recovery from cheese and casein wheys, and concentration of proteins for biopharmaceuticals) or to produce a purified permeate (eg, sewage treatment, production of sterile water or antibiotics, etc). Diafiltration is a specific ultrafiltration process in which the retentate is further purified or the permeable sohds are extracted further by the addition of water or, in the case of proteins, buffer to the retentate. 

FIG. 22-87 Schematic illustration of the chromatographic methods most commonly used in downstream processing for protein recovery... 

The protein recovery was found to be 95% of the amount injected, whereas, on the untreated carrier they were almost totally irreversibly adsorbed. Meanwhile, some reduction in the pore volume of the carrier could be deduced from the results of the chromatographic test. The calculated pore volume available for phtalic acid was 0.67 cm2/g (V) whereas for cytochrome C — 0.5 cm2/g. A detailed description of the experiment allows the evaluation of the effective thickness (teff) of the polymeric stationary phase. The tcff calculated as V/Ssp is 2.3 nm. The value... 

There is much current interest aimed at the implementation of processes that integrate the upstream and downstream operation for protein recovery.131419 Although adsorption in fluidised beds provides a considerable saving in cost and time over conventional purification techniques, it still deploys a discrete operation with which the desired protein is captured at termination of fermentation or once a cell suspension has been disrupted. The main... 

Burns, M. and Lyddiatt, A., Controlled fluidised bed protein recovery using hydrophobic matrices . The IChemE Research Event, IChemE, Rugby, UK, 1996. 

Keywords cell disruption process integration fluidised bed adsorption intracellular enzymes protein recovery... 

Adsorption in expanded or fluidised beds is now widely adopted for the direct recovery of protein products from particulate feedstocks. As an integrative protein recovery operation it circumvents process bottlenecks encountered with the solid liquid separation required upstream of fixed bed adsorption, while achieving considerable concentration and primary... 

Process control, 69, 71 Process integration, 404 Propionic acid, 4, 5, 203 Protein recovery, 404... 

Protein recovery via disruption has also been achieved by adsorbing water from the w/o-ME solution, which causes protein to precipitate out of solution. Methods of water removal include adsorption using silica gel [73,151], molecular sieves [152], or salt crystals [58,163], or formation of clanthrate hydrates [154]. In most of the cases reported, the released protein appeared as a solid phase that, importantly, was virtually surfactant-free. In contrast to the dilution technique, it appears that dehydration more successfully released biomolecules that are hydrophilic rather than hydrophobic. 

The tissue surrogates described here clearly represent a simplification of real FFPE tissues. However, they represent a useful and efficient construct for the evaluation and optimization of tissue extraction conditions for proteomic studies. More informative studies will likely be realized by using more complex tissue surrogates, which can be created by incorporating additional proteins into lysozyme solutions. Tissue surrogates comprised of up to five proteins have been successfully analyzed by MS (Fowler, unpublished data). Additionally, RNA, DNA, lipids, or carbohydrates can be added at nanomolar to millimolar concentrations to increase the complexity of the model system to better mimic whole tissue. The use of these more complex tissue surrogates should facilitate the development of protein recovery protocols optimal for proteomic investigation. 

Fowler CB, Cunningham RE, Waybright TJ, et al. Elevated hydrostatic pressure promotes protein recovery from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue surrogates. Lab. Invest. 2008 88 185-195. 

As well as overcoming many of the inherent problems associated with agriculture, plant tissue culture also offers a number of advantages over conventional animal cell culture methods currently being applied to produce biopharmaceutical proteins commercially [8], As plant culture media are relatively simple in composition and do not contain proteins, the cost of the process raw materials is reduced and protein recovery from the medium is easier and cheaper compared with animal cell culture. In addition, as most plant pathogens are unable to infect humans, the risk of pathogenic infections being transferred from the cell culture via the product is also substantially reduced. 

In this review, we focus on the use of plant tissue culture to produce foreign proteins that have direct commercial or medical applications. The development of large-scale plant tissue culture systems for the production of biopharmaceutical proteins requires efficient, high-level expression of stable, biologically active products. To minimize the cost of protein recovery and purification, it is preferable that the expression system releases the product in a form that can be harvested from the culture medium. In addition, the relevant bioprocessing issues associated with bioreactor culture of plant cells and tissues must be addressed. 

Compared with whole plants, there has been limited development of foreign protein expression systems specifically for use in tissue culture. Some modifications of expression constructs have resulted in improved protein accumulation or have allowed simplified protein recovery. However, in general, modified expression systems have been tested only in a restricted number of cases and have not resulted in the large increases in product yield required for plant cultures to compete with other foreign protein production vehicles. Transient expression techniques, for example using viral vectors, that have been developed for use in whole plants have not yet been applied in plant tissue culture. 

Proteins produced in plant cells can remain within the cell or are secreted into the apoplast via the bulk transport (secretory) pathway. In whole plants, because levels of protein accumulated intracellularly, e. g. using the KDEL sequence to ensure retention in the endoplasmic reticulum, are often higher than when the product is secreted [58], foreign proteins are generally not directed for secretion. However, as protein purification from plant biomass is potentially much more difficult and expensive than protein recovery from culture medium, protein secretion is considered an advantage in tissue culture systems. For economic harvesting from the medium, the protein should be stable once secreted and should accumulate to high levels in the extracellular environment. 

---