Biocompatibility of polymeric

As stated in the introductory chapter, water-soluble polymers, such as polyethylene oxide), poly(AT-vinylpyrrolidone), polyacrylamide, poly(vinyl alcohol), dextrans etc., have been believed to be inert to any of the biological elements. In fact, a number of trials have been carried out to improve the biocompatibility of polymeric materials by conjugating water soluble polymers,... 

M. Stangegaard, Z. Wang, J.P. Kutter, M. DufVa and A. Wolff, Whole genome expression profiling using DNA microarray for determining biocompatibility of polymeric surfaces. Molecular Biosystems, 2(9), 421 28 (2006). 

Langer, R., H. Brem, and D. Tapper, Biocompatibility of polymeric delivery systems for macromolecules. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1981,15, 267-277. 

This review of the biocompatibility of polymeric surfaces concentrates on the observed differences of hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and heterogenic materials as measured by their interactions with proteins and platelets. Emphasis is placed on materials for use in injection molding applications. 

In this study, biodegradable amphiphilic PCL-PEG-PCL copolymer was synthesized. In aqueous medium, this amphiphilic copolymer can form nano-sized micelles. The properties of nanoparticles as drag carriers were investigated, including CMC values and particle size. Moreover, the biocompatibility of polymeric nanopaiticles was also evaluated in vitro. The cytotoxicity was examined in L929 mouse fibroblasts cell line. Furthermore, nitric oxide (NO) production and reactive oxygen species (ROS> generation were also demonstrated. 

We have been prepared successfully the non-toxic polymeric micelles in this woik. The average diameter of polymeric micelles was 92.2 ran. The biocompatibility of polymeric micelles was evaluated. The polymeric micelles did not affect the cell viability. Additionally, NO production level in polymeric micelle-treated group was similar to non-treat group. This finding suggests that the prepared polymeric micelles hold great promise for anti-cancer drag delivery. 

While these cases are uncommon to rare in their occurrence, they represent factors which must be addressed in determining the biocompatibility of polymeric implants in humans. From another perspective, the altered implant/tissue interactions presented in these cases offer an opportunity to the pol3nner scientist who wishes to examine these complex problems. Included in these problems is an elucidation of those tissue and material variables which lead to variations in fibrous capsule formation. Little research has been done in this area and yet, since almost all human Implants are partially or totally encapsulated, this area would appear to be of prime importance in determining the biocompatibility of human implants. The other major area which appears to be common to the majority of implants is the infectious susceptibility of implants. Does the implant/tissue interaction predispose the tissue to an infectious process through a biochemical or physiologic mechanism What is the influence of the surface properties of the implant on interaction with bacteria and other organisms ... 

A fundamental criticism of the resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cements is that, to some extent, they go against the philosophy of the glass polyalkenoate cement namely, that the freshly mixed material should contain no monomer. Monomers are toxic, and HEMA is no exception. This disadvantage of composite resins is avoided in the glass polyalkenoate cement as the polyacid is pre-polymerized during manufacture, but the same cannot be said of these new materials. For this reason they may lack the biocompatibility of conventional glass polyalkenoate cements. These materials also absorb excessive amounts of water because of the hydrophilic nature of polyHEMA (Nicholson, Anstice McLean, 1992). 

Hiroshi Fukumura received his M.Sc and Ph.D. degrees from Tohoku University, Japan. He studied biocompatibility of polymers in the Government Industrial Research Institute of Osaka from 1983 to 1988. He became an assistant professor at Kyoto Institute of Technology in 1988, and then moved to the Department of Applied Physics, Osaka University in 1991, where he worked on the mechanism of laser ablation and laser molecular implantation. Since 1998, he is a professor in the Department of Chemistry at Tohoku University. He received the Award of the Japanese Photochemistry Association in 2000, and the Award for Creative Work from The Chemical Society Japan in 2005. His main research interest is the physical chemistry of organic molecules including polymeric materials studied with various kinds of time-resolved techniques and scanning probe microscopes. 

Polyamines and their ammonium salts have been of interest because they are known to have potential applications as chelating agents (1-3), ion exchange resins (4-6), flocculants (7,8), and other industrial uses (9). Recent biomedical applications have constituted another important use of polymeric amines they have been investigated for use as biocompatable materials, polymeric drugs, immobilization of enzymes, cell-culture substratum and cancer chemotherapeutic agents (10-12). 

In this chapter an overview of both the opportunities and the problems presented by the biological system for the use of polymeric drug delivery systems will be presented. Since the area of biocompatibility of the delivery system is a well-known constraint also imposed by the biological system and is beyond the scope of this presentation, this (important) consideration will be ignored here. In order to examine how a delivery system interacts with the biological system to... 

Step 3 Biocompatibility. The biocompatibility of selected polymers, identified in Steps 1 and 2, were evaluated by implanting flat membranes into a C57/B16 mouse (Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, ME). The membranes and capsules were implanted at various internal sites or in the back tissue under the skin. The results of these tests are not reported herein and will be discussed in a subsequent publication. They do, however, have important implications as to the ultimate selection of a polymeric system. 

Polymer grafting can be used to alter chemical and physical properties of a homopolymer. For example, Sawhney and Hubbell [18] grafted polyethyleneoxide to poly L-lysine to enhance biocompatibility of polylysine and improve the polylysine-alginate capsules. Stevenson and Sefton [19] modified alginate by grafting it with hydroxyalkyl methacrylate, again to improve the biocompatibility and to allow for polymerization by means of y-irradiation. Covalently modified (co)-polymers have not been evaluated in this study. 

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), which is a water soluble polyhidroxy polymer, is one of the widely used synthetic polymers for a variety of medical applications [197] because of easy preparation, excellent chemical resistance, and physical properties. [198] But it has poor stability in water because of its highly hydrophilic character. Therefore, to overcome this problem PVA should be insolubilized by copolymerization [43], grafting [199], crosslinking [200], and blending [201], These processes may lead a decrease in the hydrophilic character of PVA. Because of this reason these processes should be carried out in the presence of hydrophilic polymers. Polyfyinyl pyrrolidone), PVP, is one of the hydrophilic, biocompatible polymer and it is used in many biomedical applications [202] and separation processes to increase the hydrophilic character of the blended polymeric materials [203,204], An important factor in the development of new materials based on polymeric blends is the miscibility between the polymers in the mixture, because the degree of miscibility is directly related to the final properties of polymeric blends [205],... 

As was demonstrated, a variety of polymeric materials are used for preparation of dye-doped beads. Dye-doped silica beads are also extremely popular due to their chemical robustness, biocompatibility and simplicity in preparation and further functionalization of the surface [55]. Thus, polymeric, silica and Ormosil beads (which occupy intermediate position) are widely used as nanosensors and labels. On the other hand, quantum dots possess much higher cytotoxicity which often limits their application in biological systems. 

There is a current tendency to develop carriers on the basis of polypeptides and other polymeric carriers with rather simple structures. For instance, polylysines, polyhydrox-ymethyl-acrylamide and polylactic add material with variations in charge and molecular weight can be tailor-made and equipped with clustered recognition sites. The biocompatibility of such carrier systems with chronic dosing should, however, be more clearly established. 

Marques, A. R., Reis, R. L., Hunt, J. A. (2001). In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility of novel starch based polymeric and composite material. Biomaterials., 21,1471-1478. 

---