Batch process standards

The above batch process has undergone numerous refinements to improve yields, processing characteristics, purity, and storage stabiUty, but it remains the standard method of manufacture for these products. Recentiy a continuous process has been reported by Bayer AG (6) wherein the condensation is carried out in an extmder. The by-products are removed in a degassing zone, and the molten polymer, mixed with stabilizers, is subsequendy cracked to yield raw monomer. 

To describe a continuous process on a standard basis, always choose a unit of time or a consistent flow rate per-unit-of-time basis. For batch processes, select a unit-weight basis on the basis of a single batch. 

In contrast, the treatment of industrial steam generation plants is usually more difficult. There is a need to conform to a good working standard and to produce quality waterside conditions for a long period of time without serious upsets, as the systems are always very dynamic and operating conditions can continually vary. This is especially the case with those facilities whose manufacturing operations may employ some form of on-off cycle or up-down batching process, rather than a steady-state, continuous production stream. 

The same is true if another situation is considered if in a batch process a sample is taken before and after the operation under scrutiny, say, impurity elimination by recrystallization, and both samples are subjected to the same test method, the results from, say, 10 batch processes can be analyzed pairwise. If the investigated operation has a strictly additive effect on the measured parameter, this will be seen in the t-test in all other cases both the difference Axmean and the standard deviation will be affected. 

Products in Group 3 seem to us to represent the future of practical batch process control. In such systems, modern workstations perform the single-user functions (e.g control system design, set-up, and maintenance operator interface data collection historical reporting) for which they were designed, while powerful multitasking controllers perform actual control. As computer hardware and software standards continue to evolve toward distributed networks of processors optimized for specific kinds of tasks, such systems will, we feel, proliferate rapidly. 

Firstly, there are technical reasons concerning catalyst and reactor requirements. In the chemical industry, catalyst performance is critical. Compared to conventional catalysts, they are relatively expensive and catalyst production and standardization lag behind. In practice, a robust, proven catalyst is needed. For a specific application, an extended catalyst and washcoat development program is unavoidable, and in particular, for the fine chemistry in-house development is a burden. For coated systems, catalyst loading is low, making them unsuited for reactions occurring in the kinetic regime, which is particularly important for bulk chemistry and refineries. In that case, incorporated monolithic catalysts are the logical choice. Catalyst stability is crucial. It determines the amount of catalyst required for a batch process, the number of times the catalyst can be reused, and for a continuous process, the run time. 

As noted in Chapter 1, the priorities in batch processes are often quite different from those in large-scale continuous processes. Particularly when manufacturing specialty chemicals, the shortest time possible to get a new product to market is often the biggest priority (accepting that the product must meet the specifications and regulations demanded and the process must meet the required safety and environmental standards). This is particularly true if the product is protected by patent. The period over which the product is protected by patent must be exploited to its full. This means that product development, testing, pilot plant work, process design and construction should be fast tracked and carried out as much as possible in parallel. 

With small plants using batch processes this may not be the best policy. Just as there is a maximum size for standard equipment, there is a size below which the cost is almost constant. In this case, it may be more economical to buy larger equipment and save on manpower by having only one shift of workers. Often, in this low-volume region, by using larger equipment the same number of operators can process three times as much material. 

Other PET grades are manufactured for packaging films, as well as for the production of video and audio tapes. These PET types are often standard grades with an IV of 0.64 dL/g. To reduce the sticking tendency of the final product, solid additives such as Si02 or china clay with specific particle sizes and particle-size distributions are incorporated by master-batch processes. The final product, the so-called BOPET, is a biaxial oriented PET film with high mechanical strength and a thickness between 1 and 180 im. 

As an example, the results obtained for method precision and capability are presented in Table 10 for a Gage R R study performed for an oral film-coated tablet in four different labs, using six sample batches, and analyzed in replicate by two analysts in each lab. The %P/T metric was calculated according to the Ph. EUR specifications 95-105% and according to the USP specifications 90-110%. The method standard deviation (apart from the process standard deviation) is also presented, together with average assay results and confidence intervals thereof per lab and for all labs together. 

The simplest way of cutting costs is to standardize extraction plants. In batch processes with solid feed materials it is advisable to standardize the plants by using the payload volume of feed-material and calculating the capacity corresponding to the given bulk density and the elaborated cycle time. To justify these efforts a certain market size for the materials in question must be given, and the number of plants of the selected size that can be sold. The individual sizes depend on the availability of individual plant components, such as pumps, compressors, piping and armatures. For standardized pressures see Chapter 7.3.1. 

New batches of standards are produced regularly. These are intercompared with each other and also with older standards using the procedure outlined in (3.) to confirm the accuracy of the overall process. 

The economic benefit is one of the dominant problems if a micro structured reactor plant is used for chemical production. Without any doubt, an overall flow rate through a micro structured device can be achieved that is comparable to that with a conventional batch process. However, the residence time is very short because of the dimensions of a microstructured device. If the reaction kinetics are slow, an additional device is necessary to increase a dwell time. Hence, much effort should be devoted to increasing the reaction rate instead of transferring the standard protocol to a micro structured reactor [13]. 

---