Analytical procedure, assessment

The development of specific analytical methods for determining water-soluble vitamins in such matrix has not seen major activity in past decades. In the early years, microbiological and colorimetric assays were normally used for this task, while in more recent times, analytical procedures assessed for measuring vitamins in other matrices have been extended to honey, sometimes with questionable results. Only in the last decade has the attention of a number of research groups resulted in specialized and validated HPLC methods. 

Analytical Procedures. Oxygen difluoride may be determined conveniently by quantitative appHcation of k, nmr, and mass spectroscopy. Purity may also be assessed by vapor pressure measurements. Wet-chemical analyses can be conducted either by digestion with excess NaOH, followed by measurement of the excess base (2) and the fluoride ion (48,49), or by reaction with acidified KI solution, followed by measurement of the Hberated I2 (4). 

In the production of anionic surfactants, the analytical procedures to be adopted for quality control and/or assessment are of particular importance. Their reliability as well as their time and chemical demand is a fundamental topic for the economy and success of the surfactant production cycle. To this end the most important analyses to be done on the various types of anionic surfactants are outlined in Tables 15-19. Mention must be made of potentiometric titration of the sulfonic acid (whatever the processed feedstock), which allows one to obtain reliable results over a very short time. 

Definition and Uses of Standards. In the context of this paper, the term "standard" denotes a well-characterized material for which a physical parameter or concentration of chemical constituent has been determined with a known precision and accuracy. These standards can be used to check or determine (a) instrumental parameters such as wavelength accuracy, detection-system spectral responsivity, and stability (b) the instrument response to specific fluorescent species and (c) the accuracy of measurements made by specific Instruments or measurement procedures (assess whether the analytical measurement process is in statistical control and whether it exhibits bias). Once the luminescence instrumentation has been calibrated, it can be used to measure the luminescence characteristics of chemical systems, including corrected excitation and emission spectra, quantum yields, decay times, emission anisotropies, energy transfer, and, with appropriate standards, the concentrations of chemical constituents in complex S2unples. 

To validate the analytical procedure recovery experiments are performed. To this end, the CRM is spiked with a known mass of the analytes at a variety of concentration levels (at least three different levels) and the concentrations measured are compared to the expected concentrations in at least three separate experiments. The extraction step has been shown to be a critical step in the analytical procedure and it may be responsible for poor recoveries. The efficiency of this step can be assessed either by repetitive extraction of the sample or by the addition of internal standards prior to the extraction step with the assumption that the latter actually represent the behavior of the analytes of interest. 

Rodriguez LC, Garcia RB, Garcia Campana AM, Bosque Sendra JM (1998) A new approach to a complete robustness test of experimental nominal conditions of chemical testing procedures for internal analytical quality assessment. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 41 57... 

An assortment of spectroscopic, kinetic, and chemical techniques and procedures have been developed to permit assessment of the properties of carbenes. In general, each of these reveals a different aspect of the carbene. A complete picture, accurately portraying these intermediates, results only when several of these experiments can be evaluated together. In this section a brief description of the most useful of these analytical procedures is presented. The objective is to provide a basis for the interpretation of the findings that is presented later. 

The FDA s dehnition of comparability protocol is a well-defined, written plan for assessing the effect of specific CMC changes in the identity, strength, purity, and potency of a specific drug product as these factors relate to the safety and effectiveness of the product. A comparability protocol describes changes that are covered under the protocol and specifies the tests and studies that will be performed, including analytical procedures that will be used, and acceptance criteria that will be achieved to demonstrate that specified CMC changes do not adversely affect the product. ... 

The analytical procedures applied at Level 2 may be extensions of the Level 1 procedures. In most cases, however, Information developed at Level 1 will provide background for selection and utilization of more sophisticated sampling and analysis techniques. Because Level 2 analyses must positively identify the materials in sources which have already been found to cause adverse environmental effects, these analyses are the most critical of all three levels. It is equally important, however, that the analyses be conducted in an information-effective manner. This is because increasing specificity and accuracy result in cost escalations which are, at best, exponential rather than proportional. Due to the multiplicity of analytical techniques required and the potential for unnecessarily high expenditures, the analyses must be conducted with a full awareness of the information requirements of the environmental assessment program. 

Typical parameters and nutrient levels for assessment of compost quality are shown in Table 5.2. These are combined values from a variety of sources, including Bertoldi eta/. (1987), and are merely intended to help in setting up analytical procedures. 

Accuracy may be determined by application of the analytical procedure to synthetic mixtures of the product components to which known quantities of the substance to be analyzed have been added. The accuracy should be assessed by using a minimum of nine determinations over a minimum of three concentration levels covering the specified range (i.e., three concentrations and three replicates of each concentration). 

The ICH recommends that repeatability be assessed using a minimum of nine determinations covering the specified range for the procedure (e.g., three concentrations/three replicates as in the accuracy experiment) or using a minimum of six determinations at 100% of the test concentration. Reporting of the standard deviation, relative standard deviation (coefficient of variation), and confidence interval is required. The assay values are independent analyses of samples that have been carried through the complete analytical procedure from sample preparation to final test result. Table 1 provides an example set of repeatability data. 

Validation is needed to demonstrate that the analytical method complies with established criteria for different performance characteristics [82]. When these different characteristics are being evaluated individually, this is generally done for the analytical method as such—where the input is the purified or isolated analyte and the output is the analytical result. However, MU covers the whole analytical procedure, starting from the original sample lot. The assessment of MU (see Section 8.2.2) is in line with the so-called modular validation approach. Modular validation refers to the modularity of an analytical procedure divided up into several sequential steps needed to analyze the material. These may be sample preparation, analyte extraction, and analyte determination (Figure 7). Each step in the procedure can be seen as an analytical system and can thus be validated separately and combined... 

The ICH defines the accuracy of an analytical procedure as the closeness of agreement between the values that are accepted either as conventional true values or an accepted reference value and the value found. Accuracy is usually reported as percent recovery by assay, using the proposed analytical procedure, of known amount of analyte added to the sample. The ICH also recommended assessing a minimum of nine determinations over a minimum of... 

Assessment is the process of (1) collecting data to show that analytical procedures are operating within specified limits and (2) verifying that final results meet use objectives. 

Al fundamental question about the interpretation of acidic aerosol data is whether researchers can characterize past and current atmospheric concentrations and distributions (spatial and temporal) with sufficient accuracy for studies of their effects on ecosystems and human health. Part of the answer to this question can be provided by a review of the methods that have been used to measure the strong acid content of aerosol particles collected from the atmosphere. This chapter serves as such a review, and, in evaluating analytical procedures, it specifically assesses the ability of each procedure to overcome sampling artifacts, to distinguish between strong and weak acids, to properly partition strong acidity between gas-phase and aero-sol-phase species, and to quantitate strong acidity at the levels at which it is found in the ambient atmosphere. 

This chapter summarizes our results from two northern Wisconsin seepage lakes that were chosen to assess the importance of various processes controlling transport of Hg across the sediment-water interface. Total Hg (HgT) concentrations were determined as a function of depth in the solid and dissolved phases of the water column, and in littoral and profundal sediments. New sampling and analytical procedures allowed for the detection of low (picogram) levels of Hg. Measurements obtained in this phase of the study together with those obtained from previously published data on these lakes were used to make a preliminary examination of the relative importance of factors influencing Hg cycling at the sediment-water interface. 

To assess the effects of processing on the nutritional value of a plant food with respect to vitamin A activity, the various isomeric forms of provitamin A carotenoids present in both the fresh and processed states must be accurately measured. In such investigations it must be demonstrated that the analytical procedure does not itself cause trans-cis isomerization of carotenoids. 

Although there are only a limited number of methods that have been validated specifically for soft drinks, there are around 80 validated methods available for the analysis of fruit juices, most of which would work equally well for soft drinks. These methods are published in the International Fruit Juice Union (IFU) handbook of analytical procedures, which offers the best reference collection of methods for the analysis of fruit juices in the world, with new methods added on a regular basis (Anon, 2004a). The IFU s collection of analytical methods covers most of the main procedures required to assess the quality and authenticity of fruit juices and nectars. The methods are hsted on the IFU s website (http //www.ifu-fruitjuice.com) at the time of writing they cannot be purchased directly from there, but they can be obtained from the Swiss Fruit Union, Zug, and details of how to do this are given on the website. It is possible that at some time the methods will be made available directly from the website. 

Di Domenico et al. [272] have described an analytical procedure for the multianalyte/multilaboratory assessment of pollutants in complex soils. 

---