Complete analytical procedure

Validation of the complete analytical procedure (induding solvent extraction, cleanup of the extracts, isolation of the analytes of interest, and chromatographic separation and detection) requires the use of CRMs with matrices similar to those... 

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP, see ISO 78-2 [1999]). Complete Analytical Procedure, according to Kaiser [1965]... 

GC GC-MS SPME-CGC of wines Complete analytical procedure as described by De la Calle Garcia et al. [1998]... 

Precision of a complete analytical procedure, i.e., a standard operation procedure (SOP), should be characterized by the uncertainty of measurement (absolute or relative) as exactly as validation it stipulates. 

Whereas the limits ACV (Kaiser s 3ct limit, Kaiser and Specker [1956]), MLD, and MLQ are only of special interest within the corresponding domains and, therefore, of indirect importance for analytical problems, CV, LD, and LQ are the relevant quantities to characterize the performance of a complete analytical procedure according to Kaiser [1965] and a SOP according to ISO 78-2 [1999]. 

Kaiser, H. Two papers on the Limit of Detection of a Complete Analytical Procedure. LondoniHilger, 1968. 

The ICH recommends that repeatability be assessed using a minimum of nine determinations covering the specified range for the procedure (e.g., three concentrations/three replicates as in the accuracy experiment) or using a minimum of six determinations at 100% of the test concentration. Reporting of the standard deviation, relative standard deviation (coefficient of variation), and confidence interval is required. The assay values are independent analyses of samples that have been carried through the complete analytical procedure from sample preparation to final test result. Table 1 provides an example set of repeatability data. 

Dry reagent chemistries have been described for the analysis of a variety of blood constituents. These include metabolites, enzymes, electrolytes, hormones, and therapeutic drugs. A partial list is presented in Table 3. With the exception of electrolytes, nearly all analyses depend on enzyme-mediated chemistries and that includes immunochemical assays. A brief survey of element structures will illustrate how physical functions and chemical reactions used in conventional multistep procedures are integrated in the construction of dry reagent test devices. These examples will illustrate how reactions in dry reagent elements can be compartmentalized and how end produas are shunted to other compartments for further reaction. In its final form, each element provides a complete analytical procedure. 

Limit of Detection The smallest concentration of (or amount) of substances which can be reported with a specified degree of certainty by a definite, complete analytical procedure. ... 

Selected Calibration Procedures in Flow Analysis In recent decades there have been great developments in various fields of flow analysis, including a number of interesting and specific proposals for the flow mode of analysis calibration. These allow implementation of the various methods of calibration in accordance with procedures that are often completely different from those that analysts use in their everyday work [4, 5]. The advantage of these approaches compared with the procedures existing in traditional analysis relies not only on more efficient, automated implementation of full calibration (and thus also the complete analytical procedure), but also on the opportunities for more efficient use of the registered analytical signals to obtain richer measurement information. 

A complete analytical procedure may or may not include sampling, depending on the particular analytical problem to be solved and the scope of the procedure. 

The analytical accuracy of methods can only be discussed with regard to the complete analytical procedure applied. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize sample preparation procedures and trace-matrix separations specifically to the requirements of the analytical results in terms of accuracy, power of detection, precision, cost and the number of elements and increasingly of the species to be determined. However, the intrinsic sensitivity to matrix interferences of the different methods of determination remains important. 

The choice of an internal standard for an analytical procedure is often made in a too cavalier a fashion and may actually provide lower precision than external calibration. The successful use of an internal standard depends on the existence of a high correlation between the peak areas (heights) of the analytes and the internal standard for the complete analytical procedure and their being lower variability in the internal standard area (height) compared to those of the analytes [286-288]. An external standard will generally provide higher precision than an internal standard when the variation of the recovery for analytes and standards is sufficiently different and the standard deviation in the mean for repeated analyses of the internal standard is larger than that for the analytes of interest... 

All require some sort of blank correction, based on "paired observations" or a "well-known" blank. All are based on determining the limit of detection of a "complete analytical procedure". And finally, all are based on some choice of acceptable errors of the 1st and 2nd kinds. 

For flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry, the detection limit Is defined as the concentration that produces absorption equivalent to twice the magnitude of the background fluctuation. No mention is made of the blank or blank correction. This definition implies an instrument detection limit rather than a detection limit of a complete analytical procedure. Finally, no mention Is made of the need to determine the variability of responses. 

It Is apparent from the above descriptions of official methods of analysis In the United States that none of them specify that detection limits should be determined based on the variability of the blank for a complete analytical procedure. This contrasts sharply with the policy of the Standing Committee of Analysts In the United Kingdom, which Is to preferably determine the limit of detection based on the variability of the blank. Why Is this One reason Is the difference In emphasis on the blank Itself. While In the U.K. they have required that blank correction be a part of the procedure. In the U.S.A. we have not only not required blank correction but have even prohibited blank correction In some of our official methods. 

The preferred procedure for determining detection limit Is that based on the variability of blank responses for a complete analytical procedure. This... 

Instrumental detection limits should be avoided, since they do not Include the influences of sample preparation, cleanup, etc. on the detection limit. In this regard, detection limits based on signal to noise ratio should also be avoided. If used, they should be obtained from a complete analytical procedure and not Just the Instrument. 

Methodology for determining the amino acid composition of proteins. The consultation concluded that modem amino acid analysis can provide data with repeatability within a laboratory of about 5% and reproducibility between laboratories of about 10%. It recommended that this variability be considered acceptable for the purposes of calculating the amino acid score. To achieve such results requires careful attention to many aspects of the protocols, including replicating the complete analytical procedure [118]. 

MIAs have been developed for an expanding range of small molecules of medical and environmental interest. Rapid advances are being made in terms of new MIP formats (for easier handling or compatibility with ubiquitous instrumentation, e.g., microplates) and new assay formats replacing radiolabels with fluorophores, electroactive groups, and enzyme labels. In many cases, studies have been limited to proof of principle and it is expected that there will be more emphasis on demonstrating complete analytical procedures based on MIA as the technique becomes more widely accepted. 

The main objective of analysis is to ensure the water supplied to the public meets the relevant standards and does not exceed the recommended concentration of hazardous chemicals. The analyses performed by the water laboratory for compliance purposes should be performed in an accredited laboratory and comply with the recognized standard for technical competence of testing laboratories. A complete analytical procedure should include information on sample handling (collection, transport, and storage), sample preparation (concentrate and separate), analysis (methods to identify and quantify components), analytical quality control (criteria), and reporting of analytical results. 

---