Aerosol experimental procedure

Following the movement of airborne pollutants requires a natural or artificial tracer (a species specific to the source of the airborne pollutants) that can be experimentally measured at sites distant from the source. Limitations placed on the tracer, therefore, governed the design of the experimental procedure. These limitations included cost, the need to detect small quantities of the tracer, and the absence of the tracer from other natural sources. In addition, aerosols are emitted from high-temperature combustion sources that produce an abundance of very reactive species. The tracer, therefore, had to be both thermally and chemically stable. On the basis of these criteria, rare earth isotopes, such as those of Nd, were selected as tracers. The choice of tracer, in turn, dictated the analytical method (thermal ionization mass spectrometry, or TIMS) for measuring the isotopic abundances of... 

According to the Aerosol Contribution Procedures, the experimental data of column 10 follow ACP-1 and the predicted data of column 9 follow ACP-P. 

Experimental methods presented in the literature may prove of value in combustion studies of both solid and liquid suspensions. Such suspensions include the common liquid spray. Uniform droplets can be produced by aerosol generators, spinning disks, vibrating capillary tubes, and other techniques. Mechanical, physicochemical, optical, and electrical means are available for determination of droplet size and distribution. The size distribution, aggregation, and electrical properties of suspended particles are discussed as well as their flow and metering characteristics. The study of continuous fuel sprays includes both analytical and experimental procedures. Rayleigh s work on liquid jet breakup is reviewed and its subsequent verification and limitations are shown. 

Experimental Procedure Aerosol Fluorination of Dimethoxy methane [29]... 

III.l Experimental Procedure The samples were made of variable amounts of hydrophobic colloidal silica (Aerosol R972 Degussa) mixed with an index matching solvent (ethanol + ethanolamine) containing the tracer molecule (fluorescein isothiocyanate. Molecular Probes). We have checked that tracer adsorption on the silica was negligible. Further details on the sample preparation can be found in reference [16]. 

The second element of risk assessment is the risk caused by the experimental procedure. Most manipulations of these agents produce aerosols of particles that may either be inhaled or contaminate nearby surifaces (see Section 1.13). It appears that the risk associated with aerosolization is apparently greater to the suc-... 

Because information on possible long-term effects of the other irritant chemicals used in the Edgewood tests is sparse, this chapter focuses on the effects of mustard gas and two lacrimators, CS and CN. Information on the potential long-term adverse effects of these chemicals is derived from several sources first, observation of long-term disabilities in soldiers who were exposed to a single (in most cases) toxic concentration of irritant during World War I and in persons exposed in peacetime accidents or riot-control procedures second, studies of morbidity in workers chronically exposed to chemical irritants during their manufacture and third, studies in which experimental laboratory animals were exposed to selected chemicals by topical application, injection, or aerosol inhalation. 

The future of the mathematical modeling techniques is linked to cooperative activity between the theoretical and experimental arts in the field of air pollution. Important phenomena are yet to be added to any of the mathematical schemes. The formation of aerosol and its extinction of ultraviolet radiation has not been explicitly treated in the computations. Moreover, the whole area of heterogeneous reactions on either particulate surfaces or urban surfaces remains obscure. The reacting flow problem of mixedness and its influence on kinetics has not been reduced to an engineering procedure for calculational purposes. 

Fig. 3 Experimental protocol of the study. HP-NAP has been delivered systemically (i.p.) (a) or via mucosal route (b). Groups of C57BL/6j mice were treated with saline, with OVA alone, with OVA plus i.p. HP-NAP or with OVA plus mucosal HP-NAP. In both systemic and mucosal protocols, mice were treated with OVA according to a procedure consisting of a first phase of sensitization with OVA i.p. (100 pg/mouse) and a second phase of induction of the allergic response with aerosolized OVA (2% in PBS) for 5 min on day 8, and finally exposed to aerosolized antigen (1% in PBS) for 20 min daily on days 15-18. Control animals, designed as saline, were injected with PBS alone and then exposed to aerosolized PBS. In the systemic protocol (a) mice were treated with i.p. HP-NAP (10 pg/mouse) on day 1, whereas in the mucosal protocol (b) mice received intra-nasal HP-NAP (10 pg/mouse) on days 7 and 8...

The Subcommittee on Permissible Exposure Levels for Military Fuels judged that, on the basis of available data, DOD s PEL of 350 mg/m3 for the fuel vapors is adequate to protect the health of naval personnel exposed to them occupationally (NRC 1996). However, because of uncertainties in the database, the PEL should still be considered interim until further research has been completed. The subcommittee recommended that data be obtained on exposures during operational procedures, including exposure to respirable aerosols of unburned fuels that studies be conducted on the possible effects of high-level acute and low-level chronic exposure to fuel vapors on the central nervous system and that research be conducted on the effect of fuel vapors on hepatotoxicity in experimental animals to help to identify a no-observed-adverse-effect level for JP-8 with greater confidence. 

To examine the possible cause-effect relationship between human exposure to Pfiesteria-detived materials and the reported neurobehavioral impairments, a rat model was developed [89]. Using a radial-arm maze, learning and memory was examined in rats exposed to Pfiesteria extracts. Although it was proposed that individuals were affected by Pfiesteria toxin(s) most likely by breathing aerosol in the estuarine environment, possible ingesting of water, or by transdermal absorption by direct contact with contaminated water, the actual route(s) of exposure remained uncertain. Therefore, the subcutaneous injection of Pfiesteria cells or toxic bioassay aquarium water to experimental animals was chosen to ensure the delivery of a reliable toxin dose. Abnormal behaviors caused by injection of the abovementioned Pfiesteria-demed materials were reported to be relatively specific to the acquisition phase in the training procedure. When rats were pretrained, Pfiesteria treatment did not affect performance. Nevertheless, factor(s) affecting rat performance in the radial-arm maze remain unknown, because the purified Pfiesteria toxin has not been available. 

Kallio et al. developed an automated procedure for the identification of individual compounds in atmospheric samples and used it for the data analysis of rural aerosol samples [32]. In this procedure, retention indexes, quality parameters (minimum required similarity, S/N value, allowed I difference between experimental and library values), modulation parameters, library files, and retention times of reference compounds were utilized to construct a program for data analysis. As output, the program listed compounds that fulfilled the required criteria. The automated procedure was compared with manual identification, and it was concluded that the automated procedure worked satisfactorily if the concentrations were sufficiently high (above ca. 10 ng/m ), but for very low concentrations (low ng/m ) manual search was more accurate. 

Take measures to reduce contamination with which it would be possible to come into contact, e.g., using absorbent plastic-backed paper to line the work surface, procedures to reduce the production of aerosols, and a tray underneath the experimental apparatus to catch any spills. 

There is an enormous number of radioanalytical procedures based on solvent extraction and here it is only possible to give a few examples. The examples chosen have been taken from the analysis of samples from the European PHEBUS project performed at the Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology. Very briefly, the Phebus reactor was used to study the products formed in severe reactor accidents. The released gases and aerosols were collected in filters and in water at different positions in the experimental setup. 

Sedimentation velocities of aerosol particles depend on particle shape. The models of aerosol behaviour that are now available are derived for perfect spheres that have no porosity. The deviations of real particles from this ideal are handled by correction factors called shape factors. In the case of gravitational settling, the dynamic shape factor is used to account for deviations from sphericity and for porosity. These shape factors are not known well and frequently are estimated by back calculation from experimental data for simulant aerosols. This, of course, is not a reliable procedure. There have been some attempts to predict shape factors based on the fractal nature of particles that have grown by coagulation [A-7b]. 

Mayville et at. [117] extended this procedure to produce titania particles with coatings of polyurea up to 0.25 fim. thick, to provide a steric barrier when the particles were subsequently dispersed. They transported the aerosol of titania into a chamber containing vapor of hexamethylenedi-isocyanate this vapor condensed on the particles and was then polymerized by exposure to vapor of ethylenediamine. The electrophoretic mobility of the coated particles was found to be the same as for the pure polymer. It may be possible to produce monodisperse aerosols at a rapid rate without seeding by use of a properly designed nozzle [118], but this has not yet been demonstrated experimentally. 

A greater problem arises if the spill occurs in the open laboratory. All laboratory protocols should be designed to prevent such occurrences. In the event of an overt laboratory spill, the first action is evacuation of personnel fi om the affected area to minimize the exposure of personnel and experimental materials beyond those involved in the immediate area of the spill. The decontamination procedures adopted must be effective rapidly and must not create additional aerosol or allow mechanical transfer of materials to unaffected areas. Personnel carrying out the cleanup procedures must wear protective clothing and equipment, including respiratory protection (see Chapter 2). Consideration must be given to the safe disposal of all materials and liquids resulting from cleanup procedures. Reentry of personnel into the area should be avoided until it can be reasonably established that the area has been effectively decontaminated. Further specific details are provided in Appendix 1. 

---