Worker safety, improvements

The committee also discusses evaluations that should be completed improvements in monitoring that would maximize worker safety improvements in process efficiency through design changes and more rapid process monitoring. 

When used judiciously, the advantages of QRA can outweigh the associated problems and costs. Companies that prudently commission QRAs and conscientiously act on the resulting recommendations are better off for two reasons (1) they have a better base of information to make decisions and (2) their judicious use of QRA technology represents another demonstration of responsible concern for the health and safety of workers and the public. However, companies should resist the indiscriminate use of QRA as a means to solve all problems since this strategy could waste safety improvement resources, diverting attention from other essential safety activities. Once executives are able to interpret and use QRA results, they will appreciate that the quality of their decisions rests largely on their ability to understand the salient analysis assumptions and the limitations of the results. 

Reducing the temperature by 75-100°F dramatieally improves the thermal stability of packaging adhesives, resulting in significant cost savings for equipment maintenance, as well as greater worker safety. Such adhesives became possible with the availability of low MW EVA base polymers (MI of 800 and above). They rely on low MW refined paraffin wax and a blend of resins chosen for the specific application [67,68]. 

On April 6, 1994, OSHA published its final revisions to the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) standard in the Federal Register, Vol. 59, No. 66. With the implementation date of July 5, 1994, the regulation, applicable to the general industry, represented major changes in the selection and use of PPE. OSHA believes that through compliance with the PPE standard, safety statistics that track worker safety will improve. These improvements will add up to 712,000 lost workdays and 95,000 recordable cases. 

Workers are potentially exposed to a variety of substances during daily industrial operations. The OSHA estimates that a large segment of workers are simultaneously exposed to more than one substance and suffer from adverse effects. Adverse effects include many acute and chronic diseases (e.g., allergic sensitization, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, dermatitis, erythema, edema, irritation of the mucous membrane, irritation of the skin, kidney disease, liver disease, metabolic interferences, narcosis, neuropathy, ocular effects, odor effects, respiratory diseases, systemic toxicity). These should be properly addressed by concerned management and the individual worker to improve chemical safety. Workers come in contact directly or indirectly during different work conditions hence it is important to understand the possible adverse effects that these chemicals may cause vis-a-vis chemical safety. 

Improved raw materials procurement and flow by replacing two containers associated with dualcomponent adhesive with a single-component system Elimination of pot life consideration and line downtime resulting from adhesive advancement Elimination of mix ratio tolerance concerns with resulting improvement in product consistency Elimination of variations from the coating process with resulting improvement in product consistency Improved worker safety and reduced hazardous materials exposure to liquid and paste systems... 

Enhanced Worker Health and Safety Reduced use of toxic substances in the workplace is a major aspect of pollution prevention that improves air quality, water quality, and the safety of the work environment by reducing the likelihood of leaks, spills, and releases. These steps result in cost savings through preventing the loss of materials and decreased insurance rates by reducing medical claims and disability leave. Better labor relations also result from improved worker safety. 

In any cropping system, certain agrochemicals become the control method of choice because they offer improvements in cost effectiveness, worker safety, or environmental impact, relative to other available products. Simple logic indicates that their loss to resistance degrades one or more of these factors. 

Following the success of the Belgian testing, the U.S. Army supported a series of tests at Porton Down in the United Kingdom to demonstrate the usefulness of the CDC for operations in the United States. These tests included modifications of the system to enhance DE, to improve worker safety, to improve productivity, and to minimize any possibility for escape of agent vapors. 

In addition to the three notices already promulgated, the Agency is planning future Label Improvement Notices on ingredients statements, analytical methods, eye irritation standards, antifouling paints, and farm worker safety. 

Scale-down studies have been used for a wide variety of process validation studies, including resin lifetimes, in-process stream hold times, buffer stability, virus clearance, harvest criteria, filter extractables, resin leachables, and cell age at harvest [14, 91, 92]. The ease of scale-down differs depending on step and should be considered in selecting those steps to be validated [5]. In fact, certain validation issues can be addressed only via small-scale models (e.g., virus clearance evaluation, nucleic acid and other impurities/additives removal, cleaning and storage procedure evaluation, and column lifetime estimation) because their use increases worker safety, reduces costs, and permits use of higher titer samples for improved... 

A second approach, one which most economists would endorse, would set as its standard an efficient level of risk, one for which the marginal cost of making a job a little safer is exactly equal to its marginal benefit. What is intended is a solution like s in figure 6.1. Clearly each increment of safety prior to this amount produces positive net benefits (marginal benefit in excess of marginal cost) above this level additional safety improvements cost more than they are worth. Note, incidentally, that a formulation such as this assumes that the incremental cost of providing safety rises as the job becomes safer, while the incremental value of it (to the worker, presumably) falls. 

Sulfonation can also be used to improve the barrier properties of HDPE bottles to hydrocarbons. After molding, the bottles are treated with sulfur trioxide in an inert gas, producing sulfonic acid groups on the bottle s surface, which are then neutralized with ammonia or sodium hydroxide. As with fluorination, proper procedures to ensure worker safety and avoid release of the sulfur trioxide and neutralization chemicals into the environment are necessary. Sulfonation also improves the adhesion of inks and coatings to the containers. 

---